The Light and Shadow of Smartphone Applications for Eating Disorders: Commentary on Cruz et al. (2025).

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Silvia Cerea
{"title":"The Light and Shadow of Smartphone Applications for Eating Disorders: Commentary on Cruz et al. (2025).","authors":"Silvia Cerea","doi":"10.1002/eat.24536","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Smartphone applications (apps) represent promising tools to overcome common barriers to treatment in individuals within the Eating Disorders (EDs) spectrum, thanks to their constant availability and cost-effectiveness. In this context, Cruz et al. (2025) conducted the first meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the efficacy of app-based interventions for EDs. Their findings provided evidence supporting the use of app-based interventions over control conditions in reducing ED symptoms and risk factors, although effect sizes were generally small. Despite these promising findings, caution is needed due to methodological concerns in the included trials, such as limited sample diversity, inconsistent follow-up durations, and the frequent use of waitlist controls. Notably, no significant effects were observed for key ED dimensions such as body dissatisfaction/disturbance and drive for thinness, pointing to the need for interventions grounded in robust body image theory and frameworks. Furthermore, the current evidence does not adequately address the efficacy of these apps across different populations, including adolescents, gender-diverse individuals, and those from varied racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic backgrounds. To maximize the clinical utility of these tools, future research should prioritize methodologically rigorous trials, adopt inclusive and intersectional frameworks, and expand evaluative outcomes beyond symptom reduction to include multiple indicators of psychological flourishing. These directions are essential to unlock the full potential of app-based interventions for EDs across diverse populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":51067,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Eating Disorders","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Eating Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.24536","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Smartphone applications (apps) represent promising tools to overcome common barriers to treatment in individuals within the Eating Disorders (EDs) spectrum, thanks to their constant availability and cost-effectiveness. In this context, Cruz et al. (2025) conducted the first meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the efficacy of app-based interventions for EDs. Their findings provided evidence supporting the use of app-based interventions over control conditions in reducing ED symptoms and risk factors, although effect sizes were generally small. Despite these promising findings, caution is needed due to methodological concerns in the included trials, such as limited sample diversity, inconsistent follow-up durations, and the frequent use of waitlist controls. Notably, no significant effects were observed for key ED dimensions such as body dissatisfaction/disturbance and drive for thinness, pointing to the need for interventions grounded in robust body image theory and frameworks. Furthermore, the current evidence does not adequately address the efficacy of these apps across different populations, including adolescents, gender-diverse individuals, and those from varied racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic backgrounds. To maximize the clinical utility of these tools, future research should prioritize methodologically rigorous trials, adopt inclusive and intersectional frameworks, and expand evaluative outcomes beyond symptom reduction to include multiple indicators of psychological flourishing. These directions are essential to unlock the full potential of app-based interventions for EDs across diverse populations.

智能手机应用对饮食失调的光与影:对Cruz等人的评论(2025)。
智能手机应用程序(app)由于其持续可用性和成本效益,代表了克服饮食失调(EDs)患者治疗常见障碍的有希望的工具。在此背景下,Cruz等人(2025)对随机对照试验(rct)进行了首次荟萃分析,评估基于app的干预措施对急症的疗效。他们的研究结果提供了证据,支持在控制条件下使用基于app的干预措施来减少ED症状和风险因素,尽管效果通常很小。尽管有这些有希望的发现,但由于纳入试验的方法学问题,如有限的样本多样性,不一致的随访时间,以及频繁使用候补名单对照,需要谨慎。值得注意的是,在关键的ED维度上,如身体不满/不安和瘦身动力,没有观察到显著的影响,这表明需要基于强大的身体形象理论和框架的干预措施。此外,目前的证据并没有充分说明这些应用程序在不同人群中的有效性,包括青少年、性别多样化的个体,以及来自不同种族、民族和社会经济背景的人群。为了最大限度地发挥这些工具的临床效用,未来的研究应优先考虑方法学上严谨的试验,采用包容性和交叉性的框架,并将评估结果从症状减轻扩展到包括心理繁荣的多个指标。这些方向对于释放基于应用程序的急诊干预措施在不同人群中的全部潜力至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
12.70%
发文量
204
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Articles featured in the journal describe state-of-the-art scientific research on theory, methodology, etiology, clinical practice, and policy related to eating disorders, as well as contributions that facilitate scholarly critique and discussion of science and practice in the field. Theoretical and empirical work on obesity or healthy eating falls within the journal’s scope inasmuch as it facilitates the advancement of efforts to describe and understand, prevent, or treat eating disorders. IJED welcomes submissions from all regions of the world and representing all levels of inquiry (including basic science, clinical trials, implementation research, and dissemination studies), and across a full range of scientific methods, disciplines, and approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信