Facing hard truths: Medical education's reckoning with settler colonialism in an era of reconciliation.

IF 5.2 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Obinna Esomchukwu, Lisa Bishop, Libby Dean, Kori A LaDonna, Sarah Burm
{"title":"Facing hard truths: Medical education's reckoning with settler colonialism in an era of reconciliation.","authors":"Obinna Esomchukwu, Lisa Bishop, Libby Dean, Kori A LaDonna, Sarah Burm","doi":"10.1111/medu.70028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Medical schools are responsible for embedding Indigenous health education across the training continuum. Central to this work is recognising settler colonialism as an ongoing structure that privileges non-Indigenous peoples while producing and sustaining inequities for Indigenous communities. This paper explores key learning moments as non-Indigenous medical learners and faculty reflect on their experiences within systems that promote reconciliation yet remain largely rooted in colonial logic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data collection and analysis were informed by the principles of narrative inquiry. Five non-Indigenous medical students, a health research graduate student and 10 medical educators (MD and PhD) consented to participate in a narrative interview about how they positioned themselves and supported others engagement in ongoing reconciliatory efforts within their institution. Data were gathered over 2020-2022.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants acknowledged their privileged position and aimed to leverage it to address educational or health disparities affecting Indigenous peoples. Yet intervening when they witnessed unfairness proved challenging. Although many attempted to adopt a proactive stance and advocate for systemic change, the prevailing tendency in such situations was to avoid disrupting the status quo due to perceived gaps in their knowledge or apprehension about professional backlash.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Non-Indigenous medical learners and faculty struggle to navigate a system calling for transformation yet rife with historical and institutional barriers. This struggle often arises from the discomfort stemming from their privilege and a sense of limited influence within the medical hierarchy.</p>","PeriodicalId":18370,"journal":{"name":"Medical Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.70028","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Medical schools are responsible for embedding Indigenous health education across the training continuum. Central to this work is recognising settler colonialism as an ongoing structure that privileges non-Indigenous peoples while producing and sustaining inequities for Indigenous communities. This paper explores key learning moments as non-Indigenous medical learners and faculty reflect on their experiences within systems that promote reconciliation yet remain largely rooted in colonial logic.

Methods: Data collection and analysis were informed by the principles of narrative inquiry. Five non-Indigenous medical students, a health research graduate student and 10 medical educators (MD and PhD) consented to participate in a narrative interview about how they positioned themselves and supported others engagement in ongoing reconciliatory efforts within their institution. Data were gathered over 2020-2022.

Results: Participants acknowledged their privileged position and aimed to leverage it to address educational or health disparities affecting Indigenous peoples. Yet intervening when they witnessed unfairness proved challenging. Although many attempted to adopt a proactive stance and advocate for systemic change, the prevailing tendency in such situations was to avoid disrupting the status quo due to perceived gaps in their knowledge or apprehension about professional backlash.

Conclusion: Non-Indigenous medical learners and faculty struggle to navigate a system calling for transformation yet rife with historical and institutional barriers. This struggle often arises from the discomfort stemming from their privilege and a sense of limited influence within the medical hierarchy.

面对残酷的事实:和解时代的医学教育对定居者殖民主义的清算。
导言:医学院负责在整个培训过程中嵌入土著健康教育。这项工作的核心是承认定居者殖民主义是一种持续的结构,它为非土著人民提供特权,同时为土著社区制造和维持不平等。本文探讨了关键的学习时刻,作为非土著医学学习者和教师反思他们的经验,在促进和解的系统内,但仍主要植根于殖民逻辑。方法:采用叙事探究法进行数据收集和分析。五名非土著医科学生、一名卫生研究研究生和10名医学教育工作者(医学博士和博士)同意参加一次叙述性访谈,内容涉及他们如何定位自己并支持他人参与所在机构内正在进行的和解努力。数据收集于2020-2022年。结果:与会者承认他们的特殊地位,并打算利用这一地位来解决影响土著人民的教育或健康差距问题。然而,当他们目睹不公平时进行干预证明是具有挑战性的。虽然许多人试图采取积极主动的立场,提倡系统的变革,但在这种情况下,普遍的趋势是避免破坏现状,因为他们认为自己的知识有差距,或者担心职业上的反弹。结论:非土著医学学习者和教师努力导航系统呼吁转型,但充斥着历史和制度障碍。这种斗争往往源于他们的特权带来的不适,以及他们在医疗等级制度中的影响力有限的感觉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical Education
Medical Education 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
279
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Medical Education seeks to be the pre-eminent journal in the field of education for health care professionals, and publishes material of the highest quality, reflecting world wide or provocative issues and perspectives. The journal welcomes high quality papers on all aspects of health professional education including; -undergraduate education -postgraduate training -continuing professional development -interprofessional education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信