Retrospective analysis of discharge antibiotic selection and 30-day readmission rate for community acquired pneumonia

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Nick Hartwig , Eric Wombwell
{"title":"Retrospective analysis of discharge antibiotic selection and 30-day readmission rate for community acquired pneumonia","authors":"Nick Hartwig ,&nbsp;Eric Wombwell","doi":"10.1016/j.idnow.2025.105159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>This study evaluates 30-day community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) readmission rates dependent on discharge antibiotic selection.</div></div><div><h3>Patients and methods</h3><div>This is a retrospective, single-center, observational study of patients discharged with a diagnosis of CAP from July 1st, 2022 through June 30th, 2023. Patients included those empirically treated with ceftriaxone plus azithromycin and with documentation of discharge antibiotics.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Beta-lactam combination therapy represented the most frequent discharge antibiotic regimen (n = 161). Only 6/368 patients were re-admitted within 30 days. No significant difference was detected in readmission rates between beta-lactam and non-beta-lactam monotherapy (p = 0.921), or between combination therapy and monotherapy (p = 0.604). The average total duration of combined inpatient (4 days) and outpatient (5 days) antibiotic therapy was 9 days.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Broad-spectrum or combination antibiotic therapy at discharge did not result in lower readmission rates. The significant antibiotic stewardship opportunities that remain at transition from in-patient to out-patient care should prioritize narrow spectrum, short-course, monotherapy antibiotic regimens when the causative pathogen is unknown.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13539,"journal":{"name":"Infectious diseases now","volume":"55 7","pages":"Article 105159"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infectious diseases now","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666991925001381","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This study evaluates 30-day community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) readmission rates dependent on discharge antibiotic selection.

Patients and methods

This is a retrospective, single-center, observational study of patients discharged with a diagnosis of CAP from July 1st, 2022 through June 30th, 2023. Patients included those empirically treated with ceftriaxone plus azithromycin and with documentation of discharge antibiotics.

Results

Beta-lactam combination therapy represented the most frequent discharge antibiotic regimen (n = 161). Only 6/368 patients were re-admitted within 30 days. No significant difference was detected in readmission rates between beta-lactam and non-beta-lactam monotherapy (p = 0.921), or between combination therapy and monotherapy (p = 0.604). The average total duration of combined inpatient (4 days) and outpatient (5 days) antibiotic therapy was 9 days.

Conclusion

Broad-spectrum or combination antibiotic therapy at discharge did not result in lower readmission rates. The significant antibiotic stewardship opportunities that remain at transition from in-patient to out-patient care should prioritize narrow spectrum, short-course, monotherapy antibiotic regimens when the causative pathogen is unknown.
社区获得性肺炎出院抗生素选择及30天再入院率的回顾性分析。
目的:本研究评估30天社区获得性肺炎(CAP)再入院率与出院抗生素选择的关系。患者和方法:这是一项回顾性、单中心、观察性研究,研究对象为2022年7月1日至2023年6月30日诊断为CAP的出院患者。患者包括经经验使用头孢曲松加阿奇霉素治疗并有出院抗生素记录的患者。结果:β -内酰胺联合治疗是最常见的出院抗生素方案(n = 161)。只有6/368例患者在30 天内再次入院。β -内酰胺与非β -内酰胺单药治疗的再入院率无统计学差异(p = 0.921),联合治疗与单药治疗的再入院率无统计学差异(p = 0.604)。住院(4 天)和门诊(5 天)抗生素治疗的平均总时间为9 天。结论:出院时广谱或联合抗生素治疗均未降低再入院率。在从住院到门诊护理的转变中,重要的抗生素管理机会应该优先考虑在致病病原体未知的情况下使用窄谱、短疗程、单药抗生素方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Infectious diseases now
Infectious diseases now Medicine-Infectious Diseases
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
2.90%
发文量
116
审稿时长
40 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信