Feasibility, Acceptability, and Preliminary Effectiveness of a Reflective Supervision Professional Development Series Within Early Care and Education.

IF 2.2 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Early Education and Development Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-10 DOI:10.1080/10409289.2024.2424733
Lindsay Huffhines, Rebecca B Silver, Christine M Low, Rebecca Newland, Rachel Herman, Isai Ramirez, A Rani Elwy, Stephanie H Parade
{"title":"Feasibility, Acceptability, and Preliminary Effectiveness of a Reflective Supervision Professional Development Series Within Early Care and Education.","authors":"Lindsay Huffhines, Rebecca B Silver, Christine M Low, Rebecca Newland, Rachel Herman, Isai Ramirez, A Rani Elwy, Stephanie H Parade","doi":"10.1080/10409289.2024.2424733","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The positive impacts of Reflective Supervision (RS) are becoming increasingly evident. This approach may be especially important for early childhood teachers, who must deliver academic curricula and attend to children's social-emotional development while maintaining high-quality program standards in increasingly challenging environmental contexts. However, to effectively provide RS to early childhood teachers, supervisors must first be trained in this approach. This paper describes the results of one such innovative training effort using data from a statewide, community-based program evaluation and a pilot open trial in the United States. Participants (N = 83 supervisors) were offered foundational training in RS followed by monthly skill-building sessions. We used a concurrent mixed methods approach, integrating observational, survey, and interview data collected simultaneously to assess feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effectiveness of the RS professional development series. Data integration was achieved through contiguous narrative and joint display approaches.</p><p><strong>Research findings: </strong>The RS series was feasible to implement, acceptable to participants, and led to improved reflective supervisory competencies.</p><p><strong>Practice or policy: </strong>The RS series may represent an opportunity to effectively support the early care and education workforce, and in turn, benefit children. We discuss some differences between samples that may be useful for future implementation efforts across early care and education settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":11448,"journal":{"name":"Early Education and Development","volume":"36 5","pages":"967-990"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12413010/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Early Education and Development","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2024.2424733","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The positive impacts of Reflective Supervision (RS) are becoming increasingly evident. This approach may be especially important for early childhood teachers, who must deliver academic curricula and attend to children's social-emotional development while maintaining high-quality program standards in increasingly challenging environmental contexts. However, to effectively provide RS to early childhood teachers, supervisors must first be trained in this approach. This paper describes the results of one such innovative training effort using data from a statewide, community-based program evaluation and a pilot open trial in the United States. Participants (N = 83 supervisors) were offered foundational training in RS followed by monthly skill-building sessions. We used a concurrent mixed methods approach, integrating observational, survey, and interview data collected simultaneously to assess feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effectiveness of the RS professional development series. Data integration was achieved through contiguous narrative and joint display approaches.

Research findings: The RS series was feasible to implement, acceptable to participants, and led to improved reflective supervisory competencies.

Practice or policy: The RS series may represent an opportunity to effectively support the early care and education workforce, and in turn, benefit children. We discuss some differences between samples that may be useful for future implementation efforts across early care and education settings.

早期护理和教育中反思性监督专业发展系列的可行性、可接受性和初步有效性。
反思性监管的积极影响越来越明显。这种方法对幼儿教师尤其重要,因为他们必须教授学术课程,关注儿童的社会情感发展,同时在日益具有挑战性的环境中保持高质量的课程标准。然而,为了有效地为幼儿教师提供RS,主管必须首先接受这种方法的培训。本文描述了这样一个创新培训工作的结果,使用的数据来自一个全州范围的、以社区为基础的项目评估和美国的一个试点公开试验。参与者(N = 83名主管)接受RS基础培训,随后每月进行技能建设会议。我们采用并行混合方法,整合同时收集的观察、调查和访谈数据,以评估RS专业发展系列的可行性、可接受性和初步有效性。通过连续叙述和联合显示的方式实现数据集成。研究发现:RS系列是可行的实施,可接受的参与者,并导致提高反思性监管能力。实践或政策:RS系列可能代表有效支持早期护理和教育工作人员的机会,从而使儿童受益。我们讨论了样本之间的一些差异,这些差异可能对未来在早期护理和教育环境中的实施工作有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
10.30%
发文量
78
期刊介绍: Early Education and Development (EE&D) is a professional journal for those involved in educational and preschool services and research related to children and their families: early education supervisors, school psychologists, daycare administrators, child development specialists, developmental and child clinical psychologists, and special education administrators. It is designed to emphasize the implications for practice of research and solid scientific information. The age range focused upon is preschool through the primary grades. EE&D is a connecting link between the research community in early education and child development and school district early education programs, daycare systems, and special needs preschool programs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信