Signature of Attention: Historical Ambiguities and Elisions in Contemporary Psychological Framings of Attending

IF 0.9 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Antti Saari, Bernadette M. Baker
{"title":"Signature of Attention: Historical Ambiguities and Elisions in Contemporary Psychological Framings of Attending","authors":"Antti Saari,&nbsp;Bernadette M. Baker","doi":"10.1111/edth.70031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In contemporary contexts of digitalization, proliferating media, and generative AI, various “life hacks” are regularly recommended to disconnect and resist distraction, ranging from meditation to getting back to nature to unplugging. This paper traces contemporary concerns over “the attention crisis” into a longer signature — the frequently elided field of signification today referred to as “spiritual,” a signature which links attention to theories of deep personal transformation and technologies of the self. First, we examine historiographical issues arising in studies related to the contemporary attention crisis, exposing the challenges of attending to attending. Second, we delineate how European-based Christian monasticism developed practices for disciplining “attention” in new institutional settings. We argue that this process was simultaneously bound to projections of Othering and to the cultivation of critical attitudes. In particular, we delineate how these medieval forms of Othering (in both “spiritualist” and “demographic” terms) were involved in practices of vigilance and attending that became indelibly etched in Christian empire-building through governing souls and violent persecutions. Tracing these genealogical trajectories retrieves recent elisions of the complexities in problematizing attention. We suggest that contemporary ways of thinking about and acting on an “attention crisis” in education are still marked by signatures of spirituality and their allied binaries, Othering logics, and ambiguities.</p>","PeriodicalId":47134,"journal":{"name":"EDUCATIONAL THEORY","volume":"75 5","pages":"936-961"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/edth.70031","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EDUCATIONAL THEORY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/edth.70031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In contemporary contexts of digitalization, proliferating media, and generative AI, various “life hacks” are regularly recommended to disconnect and resist distraction, ranging from meditation to getting back to nature to unplugging. This paper traces contemporary concerns over “the attention crisis” into a longer signature — the frequently elided field of signification today referred to as “spiritual,” a signature which links attention to theories of deep personal transformation and technologies of the self. First, we examine historiographical issues arising in studies related to the contemporary attention crisis, exposing the challenges of attending to attending. Second, we delineate how European-based Christian monasticism developed practices for disciplining “attention” in new institutional settings. We argue that this process was simultaneously bound to projections of Othering and to the cultivation of critical attitudes. In particular, we delineate how these medieval forms of Othering (in both “spiritualist” and “demographic” terms) were involved in practices of vigilance and attending that became indelibly etched in Christian empire-building through governing souls and violent persecutions. Tracing these genealogical trajectories retrieves recent elisions of the complexities in problematizing attention. We suggest that contemporary ways of thinking about and acting on an “attention crisis” in education are still marked by signatures of spirituality and their allied binaries, Othering logics, and ambiguities.

关注的签名:当代关注心理框架中的历史模糊与疏漏
在数字化、媒体激增和生成式人工智能的当代背景下,人们经常推荐各种“生活技巧”来断开连接并抵制分心,从冥想到回归自然再到拔掉插头。这篇论文将当代对“注意力危机”的关注追溯到一个更长的签名——经常被省略的意义领域,今天被称为“精神”,一个将注意力与深层个人转变理论和自我技术联系起来的签名。首先,我们研究了与当代注意力危机相关的研究中出现的史学问题,揭示了关注到关注的挑战。其次,我们描述了以欧洲为基础的基督教修道是如何在新的制度环境中发展出训练“注意力”的实践的。我们认为,这一过程同时与他者的预测和批判态度的培养有关。特别是,我们描述了这些中世纪形式的“他者”(用“唯灵论”和“人口学”两种术语)是如何参与到警惕和参与的实践中去的,这些实践通过对灵魂的统治和暴力迫害,在基督教帝国的建设中留下了不可抹去的印记。追踪这些家谱轨迹可以检索到最近出现的问题化注意力的复杂性。我们认为,当代对教育中的“注意力危机”的思考和行动方式仍然以灵性及其相关的二元性、其他逻辑和模糊性的特征为特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
EDUCATIONAL THEORY
EDUCATIONAL THEORY EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: The general purposes of Educational Theory are to foster the continuing development of educational theory and to encourage wide and effective discussion of theoretical problems within the educational profession. In order to achieve these purposes, the journal is devoted to publishing scholarly articles and studies in the foundations of education, and in related disciplines outside the field of education, which contribute to the advancement of educational theory. It is the policy of the sponsoring organizations to maintain the journal as an open channel of communication and as an open forum for discussion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信