Citizenship by Choice, Not Necessity: Political and Emotional Drivers of Naturalisation Intentions Among Migrants From High Income Countries

IF 2.6 2区 社会学 Q1 DEMOGRAPHY
Nils Witte, Floris Peters
{"title":"Citizenship by Choice, Not Necessity: Political and Emotional Drivers of Naturalisation Intentions Among Migrants From High Income Countries","authors":"Nils Witte,&nbsp;Floris Peters","doi":"10.1002/psp.70105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In the growing body of research on immigrant naturalisation, migrants from high income countries have received scant attention in their own right because of their relatively low baseline citizenship acquisition rates. Established theories predominantly explain why they would not naturalise, yet in absolute terms, many do. To better understand those exceptional cases, this article focuses specially on determinants of naturalisation of migrants from high income countries, relying on a unique probability-based survey of German emigrants augmented with country-level information from GLOBALCIT and the V-Dem project (<i>N</i> = 1876). In line with the notion that their original citizenship provides substantial mobility rights, including the opportunity to return to a stable, wealthy country, dual citizenship toleration is a strong predictor of their naturalisation intentions. Because the instrumental value of an additional citizenship is so low for migrants from high income countries, subjective aspects like emotional attachment to the host country and emotional detachment from the origin country matter as well. Finally, interest in host country politics and elements of participatory democracy in host countries are also associated with naturalisation intentions.</p>","PeriodicalId":48067,"journal":{"name":"Population Space and Place","volume":"31 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/psp.70105","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Population Space and Place","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/psp.70105","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the growing body of research on immigrant naturalisation, migrants from high income countries have received scant attention in their own right because of their relatively low baseline citizenship acquisition rates. Established theories predominantly explain why they would not naturalise, yet in absolute terms, many do. To better understand those exceptional cases, this article focuses specially on determinants of naturalisation of migrants from high income countries, relying on a unique probability-based survey of German emigrants augmented with country-level information from GLOBALCIT and the V-Dem project (N = 1876). In line with the notion that their original citizenship provides substantial mobility rights, including the opportunity to return to a stable, wealthy country, dual citizenship toleration is a strong predictor of their naturalisation intentions. Because the instrumental value of an additional citizenship is so low for migrants from high income countries, subjective aspects like emotional attachment to the host country and emotional detachment from the origin country matter as well. Finally, interest in host country politics and elements of participatory democracy in host countries are also associated with naturalisation intentions.

Abstract Image

选择而非必须的公民身份:高收入国家移民入籍意愿的政治和情感驱动因素
在越来越多关于移民入籍的研究中,来自高收入国家的移民由于其相对较低的基线入籍率而很少受到关注。现有的理论主要解释了为什么他们不会归化,但从绝对意义上讲,许多人会归化。为了更好地理解这些例外情况,本文特别关注高收入国家移民入籍的决定因素,依靠一项独特的基于概率的德国移民调查,并结合来自GLOBALCIT和V-Dem项目(N = 1876)的国家级信息。他们最初的公民身份提供了大量的流动权利,包括回到一个稳定、富裕的国家的机会,与这一概念相一致,双重国籍的容纳度是他们入籍意愿的一个强有力的预测指标。由于对来自高收入国家的移民来说,额外公民身份的工具价值非常低,因此对东道国的情感依恋和对原籍国的情感疏离等主观方面也很重要。最后,对东道国政治和参与式民主要素的兴趣也与归化意图有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
87
期刊介绍: Population, Space and Place aims to be the leading English-language research journal in the field of geographical population studies. It intends to: - Inform population researchers of the best theoretical and empirical research on topics related to population, space and place - Promote and further enhance the international standing of population research through the exchange of views on what constitutes best research practice - Facilitate debate on issues of policy relevance and encourage the widest possible discussion and dissemination of the applications of research on populations - Review and evaluate the significance of recent research findings and provide an international platform where researchers can discuss the future course of population research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信