Development of a cognitive function assessment tool based on psychomotor function tests in patients with schizophrenia

IF 2.4 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Schizophrenia Research-Cognition Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-08 DOI:10.1016/j.scog.2025.100390
Yuma Shimizu , Ippei Takeuchi , Masakazu Hatano , Manako Hanya , Kiyoshi Fujita , Nakao Iwata , Hiroyuki Kamei
{"title":"Development of a cognitive function assessment tool based on psychomotor function tests in patients with schizophrenia","authors":"Yuma Shimizu ,&nbsp;Ippei Takeuchi ,&nbsp;Masakazu Hatano ,&nbsp;Manako Hanya ,&nbsp;Kiyoshi Fujita ,&nbsp;Nakao Iwata ,&nbsp;Hiroyuki Kamei","doi":"10.1016/j.scog.2025.100390","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Cognitive dysfunction has a significant impact on social functioning, such as employment, in patients with schizophrenia. However, existing cognitive assessments are time-consuming, impose a significant burden on patients, and require specialized training for evaluators, making them impractical for routine clinical use. Therefore, the present study investigated whether a simple and novel assessment tool, called Psychomotor Function Tests (PFT), correlates with existing Neuropsychological Tests (NT) and assessments with the Life Assessment Scale for the Mentally Ill (LASMI), which evaluates social functioning, including employment.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Cognitive function was examined in 24 patients with schizophrenia using NT (the Japanese Adult Reading Test, Trail Making Test (TMT), and word fluency test) and tablet-based PFT, while social functioning was evaluated using LASMI. Twenty-four healthy controls (HCs) underwent the same cognitive assessments.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Psychomotor function, as evaluated by the choice reaction time, compensatory tracking test, and rapid visual information processing, was significantly worse in patients with schizophrenia than in HCs (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). Furthermore, the composite score of PFT correlated with the time required for TMT (<em>r</em> = −0.707, −0.637) and LASMI subscales related to work, endurance &amp; stability, self-recognition, required skills, and retention skills (<em>r</em> = −0.640, −0.689, −0.634, −0.420, −0.548).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>PFT correlated with existing NT, which are widely used in cognitive function assessments. Cognitive function examined by PFT was closely associated with social functioning. These results suggest the potential of PFT for evaluating cognitive function in routine clinical settings for patients with schizophrenia.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38119,"journal":{"name":"Schizophrenia Research-Cognition","volume":"42 ","pages":"Article 100390"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Schizophrenia Research-Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215001325000484","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Cognitive dysfunction has a significant impact on social functioning, such as employment, in patients with schizophrenia. However, existing cognitive assessments are time-consuming, impose a significant burden on patients, and require specialized training for evaluators, making them impractical for routine clinical use. Therefore, the present study investigated whether a simple and novel assessment tool, called Psychomotor Function Tests (PFT), correlates with existing Neuropsychological Tests (NT) and assessments with the Life Assessment Scale for the Mentally Ill (LASMI), which evaluates social functioning, including employment.

Methods

Cognitive function was examined in 24 patients with schizophrenia using NT (the Japanese Adult Reading Test, Trail Making Test (TMT), and word fluency test) and tablet-based PFT, while social functioning was evaluated using LASMI. Twenty-four healthy controls (HCs) underwent the same cognitive assessments.

Results

Psychomotor function, as evaluated by the choice reaction time, compensatory tracking test, and rapid visual information processing, was significantly worse in patients with schizophrenia than in HCs (p < 0.001). Furthermore, the composite score of PFT correlated with the time required for TMT (r = −0.707, −0.637) and LASMI subscales related to work, endurance & stability, self-recognition, required skills, and retention skills (r = −0.640, −0.689, −0.634, −0.420, −0.548).

Conclusion

PFT correlated with existing NT, which are widely used in cognitive function assessments. Cognitive function examined by PFT was closely associated with social functioning. These results suggest the potential of PFT for evaluating cognitive function in routine clinical settings for patients with schizophrenia.
基于精神分裂症患者精神运动功能测试的认知功能评估工具的开发
精神分裂症患者的认知功能障碍对社会功能(如就业)有显著影响。然而,现有的认知评估费时,给患者带来沉重的负担,并且需要对评估人员进行专门培训,使其无法用于常规临床应用。因此,本研究调查了一种简单而新颖的评估工具,称为精神运动功能测试(PFT),是否与现有的神经心理测试(NT)和评估精神病患者生活评估量表(LASMI)相关,后者评估社会功能,包括就业。方法对24例精神分裂症患者采用NT(日本成人阅读测验、TMT、单词流畅性测验)和平板电脑PFT检测认知功能,采用LASMI评估社会功能。24名健康对照(hc)接受了相同的认知评估。结果通过选择反应时间、代偿跟踪试验和快速视觉信息加工来评估精神分裂症患者的心理运动功能,其表现明显差于正常人(p < 0.001)。此外,PFT的综合得分与TMT所需的时间相关(r = - 0.707, - 0.637),与LASMI工作、耐力和稳定性、自我认知、所需技能和保留技能相关的子量表相关(r = - 0.640, - 0.689, - 0.634, - 0.420, - 0.548)。结论pft与现有NT相关,可广泛用于认知功能评估。PFT检测的认知功能与社会功能密切相关。这些结果表明PFT在精神分裂症患者的常规临床环境中评估认知功能的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
10.70%
发文量
54
审稿时长
67 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书