{"title":"An MPM-FDM coupled method for landslide analysis considering surface–subsurface conjugated water flow","authors":"Z.Q. Zhan , C. Zhou , C.Q. Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.compgeo.2025.107618","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The material point method (MPM) can effectively simulate large deformation problems involving hydro-mechanical coupling, such as rainfall-induced landslides. Current MPM formulations simulate rainfall boundaries by applying either pore water pressure or velocity boundaries directly. This method does not incorporate the effects of surface water ponding and runoff during heavy rainfall. To address this problem, this study proposes a coupled method that integrates the MPM with the finite difference method (FDM) for hydro-mechanical analysis. Underground water flow is modelled using a two-phase, two-point MPM with the Richards equation, while surface water flow is computed by FDM based on shallow water equations. The two models are coupled: the FDM provides the surface water flow velocity and pore water pressure for subsurface flow simulation in the MPM, while the MPM supplies the surface infiltration rate for surface water flow simulation in the FDM. The new method was validated against existing numerical simulations and centrifuge tests. It was found that the new method can effectively capture the interactions between surface and subsurface flows, as well as the shallow landslide involving surface erosion or washout, which existing MPM codes cannot simulate. Parametric studies further reveal that neglecting the coupling effects of surface–subsurface flow predicts deeper sliding surfaces and longer rainfall durations to failure due to the ignorance of surface ponding and positive pore water pressure at the ground surface. Considering surface water flow tends to shift the failure mode from “slide-to-flow” to “flow-like”, especially when slope angle is larger and soil permeability is lower.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55217,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Geotechnics","volume":"189 ","pages":"Article 107618"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers and Geotechnics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266352X25005671","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The material point method (MPM) can effectively simulate large deformation problems involving hydro-mechanical coupling, such as rainfall-induced landslides. Current MPM formulations simulate rainfall boundaries by applying either pore water pressure or velocity boundaries directly. This method does not incorporate the effects of surface water ponding and runoff during heavy rainfall. To address this problem, this study proposes a coupled method that integrates the MPM with the finite difference method (FDM) for hydro-mechanical analysis. Underground water flow is modelled using a two-phase, two-point MPM with the Richards equation, while surface water flow is computed by FDM based on shallow water equations. The two models are coupled: the FDM provides the surface water flow velocity and pore water pressure for subsurface flow simulation in the MPM, while the MPM supplies the surface infiltration rate for surface water flow simulation in the FDM. The new method was validated against existing numerical simulations and centrifuge tests. It was found that the new method can effectively capture the interactions between surface and subsurface flows, as well as the shallow landslide involving surface erosion or washout, which existing MPM codes cannot simulate. Parametric studies further reveal that neglecting the coupling effects of surface–subsurface flow predicts deeper sliding surfaces and longer rainfall durations to failure due to the ignorance of surface ponding and positive pore water pressure at the ground surface. Considering surface water flow tends to shift the failure mode from “slide-to-flow” to “flow-like”, especially when slope angle is larger and soil permeability is lower.
期刊介绍:
The use of computers is firmly established in geotechnical engineering and continues to grow rapidly in both engineering practice and academe. The development of advanced numerical techniques and constitutive modeling, in conjunction with rapid developments in computer hardware, enables problems to be tackled that were unthinkable even a few years ago. Computers and Geotechnics provides an up-to-date reference for engineers and researchers engaged in computer aided analysis and research in geotechnical engineering. The journal is intended for an expeditious dissemination of advanced computer applications across a broad range of geotechnical topics. Contributions on advances in numerical algorithms, computer implementation of new constitutive models and probabilistic methods are especially encouraged.