An MPM-FDM coupled method for landslide analysis considering surface–subsurface conjugated water flow

IF 6.2 1区 工程技术 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Z.Q. Zhan , C. Zhou , C.Q. Liu
{"title":"An MPM-FDM coupled method for landslide analysis considering surface–subsurface conjugated water flow","authors":"Z.Q. Zhan ,&nbsp;C. Zhou ,&nbsp;C.Q. Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.compgeo.2025.107618","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The material point method (MPM) can effectively simulate large deformation problems involving hydro-mechanical coupling, such as rainfall-induced landslides. Current MPM formulations simulate rainfall boundaries by applying either pore water pressure or velocity boundaries directly. This method does not incorporate the effects of surface water ponding and runoff during heavy rainfall. To address this problem, this study proposes a coupled method that integrates the MPM with the finite difference method (FDM) for hydro-mechanical analysis. Underground water flow is modelled using a two-phase, two-point MPM with the Richards equation, while surface water flow is computed by FDM based on shallow water equations. The two models are coupled: the FDM provides the surface water flow velocity and pore water pressure for subsurface flow simulation in the MPM, while the MPM supplies the surface infiltration rate for surface water flow simulation in the FDM. The new method was validated against existing numerical simulations and centrifuge tests. It was found that the new method can effectively capture the interactions between surface and subsurface flows, as well as the shallow landslide involving surface erosion or washout, which existing MPM codes cannot simulate. Parametric studies further reveal that neglecting the coupling effects of surface–subsurface flow predicts deeper sliding surfaces and longer rainfall durations to failure due to the ignorance of surface ponding and positive pore water pressure at the ground surface. Considering surface water flow tends to shift the failure mode from “slide-to-flow” to “flow-like”, especially when slope angle is larger and soil permeability is lower.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55217,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Geotechnics","volume":"189 ","pages":"Article 107618"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers and Geotechnics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266352X25005671","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The material point method (MPM) can effectively simulate large deformation problems involving hydro-mechanical coupling, such as rainfall-induced landslides. Current MPM formulations simulate rainfall boundaries by applying either pore water pressure or velocity boundaries directly. This method does not incorporate the effects of surface water ponding and runoff during heavy rainfall. To address this problem, this study proposes a coupled method that integrates the MPM with the finite difference method (FDM) for hydro-mechanical analysis. Underground water flow is modelled using a two-phase, two-point MPM with the Richards equation, while surface water flow is computed by FDM based on shallow water equations. The two models are coupled: the FDM provides the surface water flow velocity and pore water pressure for subsurface flow simulation in the MPM, while the MPM supplies the surface infiltration rate for surface water flow simulation in the FDM. The new method was validated against existing numerical simulations and centrifuge tests. It was found that the new method can effectively capture the interactions between surface and subsurface flows, as well as the shallow landslide involving surface erosion or washout, which existing MPM codes cannot simulate. Parametric studies further reveal that neglecting the coupling effects of surface–subsurface flow predicts deeper sliding surfaces and longer rainfall durations to failure due to the ignorance of surface ponding and positive pore water pressure at the ground surface. Considering surface water flow tends to shift the failure mode from “slide-to-flow” to “flow-like”, especially when slope angle is larger and soil permeability is lower.
考虑地表-地下共轭水流的MPM-FDM耦合滑坡分析方法
物质点法(MPM)可以有效地模拟暴雨引发的滑坡等水力耦合大变形问题。目前的MPM公式通过直接应用孔隙水压力或速度边界来模拟降雨边界。这种方法不考虑强降雨期间地表水蓄水和径流的影响。为了解决这一问题,本研究提出了一种将MPM与有限差分法(FDM)相结合的耦合方法用于水力学分析。地下水流采用基于Richards方程的两相两点MPM模型,地表水水流采用基于浅水方程的FDM模型。两个模型是耦合的,FDM模型为MPM模型提供地表水流速和孔隙水压力,MPM模型为FDM模型提供地表水流速和孔隙水压力。通过现有的数值模拟和离心机试验验证了新方法的有效性。结果表明,该方法可以有效地捕捉地表与地下水流的相互作用,以及现有的MPM程序无法模拟的地表侵蚀或冲蚀浅层滑坡。参数研究进一步表明,忽略地表-地下流动的耦合效应,由于忽略地表积水和地表正孔隙水压力,导致滑动面更深,降雨持续时间更长。考虑地表水的流动倾向于将破坏模式从“滑-流”转变为“流-样”,特别是当坡角较大,土壤渗透性较低时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Computers and Geotechnics
Computers and Geotechnics 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
15.10%
发文量
438
审稿时长
45 days
期刊介绍: The use of computers is firmly established in geotechnical engineering and continues to grow rapidly in both engineering practice and academe. The development of advanced numerical techniques and constitutive modeling, in conjunction with rapid developments in computer hardware, enables problems to be tackled that were unthinkable even a few years ago. Computers and Geotechnics provides an up-to-date reference for engineers and researchers engaged in computer aided analysis and research in geotechnical engineering. The journal is intended for an expeditious dissemination of advanced computer applications across a broad range of geotechnical topics. Contributions on advances in numerical algorithms, computer implementation of new constitutive models and probabilistic methods are especially encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信