Concurrent-not independent-M1 anodal and cerebellar cathodal tDCS enhances skill acquisition of a dexterous rhythmic-timing video game.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Journal of neurophysiology Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-04 DOI:10.1152/jn.00108.2025
Davin Greenwell, Anthony W Meek, Hayami Nishio, Brach Poston, Zachary A Riley
{"title":"Concurrent-not independent-M1 anodal and cerebellar cathodal tDCS enhances skill acquisition of a dexterous rhythmic-timing video game.","authors":"Davin Greenwell, Anthony W Meek, Hayami Nishio, Brach Poston, Zachary A Riley","doi":"10.1152/jn.00108.2025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a noninvasive brain stimulation technique that can alter the excitability of targeted brain regions and influence motor learning. For the first experiment, we studied the effects of several individual stimulation montages (2 mA) on motor learning in a complex rhythm-timing video game task [<i>n</i> = 79, M1 anodal tDCS (M1 a-tDCS), cerebellar anodal tDCS (CB a-tDCS), cerebellar cathodal tDCS (CB c-tDCS), and SHAM]. Performance was assessed using a performance index (PI) incorporating keystroke timing accuracy, tap distribution ratio, and key error rate. All groups demonstrated significant improvements in PI (<i>P</i> < 0.001), but no significant interaction effect of tDCS group by practice block was observed. However, a nonsignificant trend toward improved PI scores was observed in both the M1 a-tDCS and CB c-tDCS groups, which led us to perform a second experiment using the same video game task, but with concurrent M1 anodal and cerebellar cathodal tDCS (<i>n</i> = 24, M1a + CBc tDCS). With concurrent stimulation, there was a significant main effect of stimulation group on PI gain scores across practice blocks (<i>P</i> = 0.021), with M1a + CBc showing greater gains than SHAM. When controlling for baseline performance, the M1a + CBc group had significantly higher posttest PI scores compared with the sham group (<i>P</i> = 0.034). The results of this study suggest concurrent M1a + CBc stimulation causes neuroplastic changes between M1 and the cerebellum that enhance motor learning in complex tasks beyond what single-site stimulation can provide.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> Through a series of many different stimulation conditions and two experiments, we were able to demonstrate the significance of multisite transcranial direct current stimulation on skill learning of a complex task. What started out with testing several single stimulation montages eventually led to discovering the compounding benefit of doing two sites at once. We believe this will be the future of neuromodulation, as protocols become increasingly more efficient based on the motor tasks used.</p>","PeriodicalId":16563,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurophysiology","volume":" ","pages":"1075-1084"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00108.2025","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a noninvasive brain stimulation technique that can alter the excitability of targeted brain regions and influence motor learning. For the first experiment, we studied the effects of several individual stimulation montages (2 mA) on motor learning in a complex rhythm-timing video game task [n = 79, M1 anodal tDCS (M1 a-tDCS), cerebellar anodal tDCS (CB a-tDCS), cerebellar cathodal tDCS (CB c-tDCS), and SHAM]. Performance was assessed using a performance index (PI) incorporating keystroke timing accuracy, tap distribution ratio, and key error rate. All groups demonstrated significant improvements in PI (P < 0.001), but no significant interaction effect of tDCS group by practice block was observed. However, a nonsignificant trend toward improved PI scores was observed in both the M1 a-tDCS and CB c-tDCS groups, which led us to perform a second experiment using the same video game task, but with concurrent M1 anodal and cerebellar cathodal tDCS (n = 24, M1a + CBc tDCS). With concurrent stimulation, there was a significant main effect of stimulation group on PI gain scores across practice blocks (P = 0.021), with M1a + CBc showing greater gains than SHAM. When controlling for baseline performance, the M1a + CBc group had significantly higher posttest PI scores compared with the sham group (P = 0.034). The results of this study suggest concurrent M1a + CBc stimulation causes neuroplastic changes between M1 and the cerebellum that enhance motor learning in complex tasks beyond what single-site stimulation can provide.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Through a series of many different stimulation conditions and two experiments, we were able to demonstrate the significance of multisite transcranial direct current stimulation on skill learning of a complex task. What started out with testing several single stimulation montages eventually led to discovering the compounding benefit of doing two sites at once. We believe this will be the future of neuromodulation, as protocols become increasingly more efficient based on the motor tasks used.

并发-而非独立- M1阳极和小脑阴极tDCS增强灵巧节奏定时视频游戏的技能习得。
经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)是一种非侵入性的脑刺激技术,可以改变目标脑区域的兴奋性并影响运动学习。在第一个实验中,我们研究了几个单独的刺激蒙太奇(2mA)对复杂节奏定时视频游戏任务中运动学习的影响(n=79, M1节点tDCS [M1 -tDCS],小脑节点tDCS [CB -tDCS],小脑阴极tDCS [CB -tDCS]和SHAM)。使用性能指数(PI)评估性能,包括击键定时精度,轻击分布率和键错误率。各组PI均有显著改善(P < 0.001),但tDCS组与练习块无显著交互作用。然而,在M1a -tDCS组和CB c-tDCS组中都观察到PI得分提高的非显著趋势,这导致我们使用相同的视频游戏任务进行第二次实验,但同时使用M1阳极和小脑阴极tDCS (n=24, M1a+CBc tDCS)。在同时刺激的情况下,刺激组对整个练习块的PI增益得分有显著的主效应(P = 0.021), M1a+CBc的增益大于SHAM。在控制基线表现时,M1a+CBc组的测试后PI评分明显高于假手术组(P = 0.034)。这项研究的结果表明,同时刺激M1a+CBc导致M1和小脑之间的神经可塑性变化,从而增强复杂任务中的运动学习,这是单点刺激所不能提供的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of neurophysiology
Journal of neurophysiology 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
8.00%
发文量
255
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurophysiology publishes original articles on the function of the nervous system. All levels of function are included, from the membrane and cell to systems and behavior. Experimental approaches include molecular neurobiology, cell culture and slice preparations, membrane physiology, developmental neurobiology, functional neuroanatomy, neurochemistry, neuropharmacology, systems electrophysiology, imaging and mapping techniques, and behavioral analysis. Experimental preparations may be invertebrate or vertebrate species, including humans. Theoretical studies are acceptable if they are tied closely to the interpretation of experimental data and elucidate principles of broad interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信