Effect of Different Muscle Relaxation on Motor Control: Comparison Between Ballistic and Ramp Task Methods.

IF 2.4 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Perceptual and Motor Skills Pub Date : 2026-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-03 DOI:10.1177/00315125251374115
Hitomi Matsumoto, Yuma Takenaka, Tomotaka Suzuki, Naoko Shimadu, Kenichi Sugawara
{"title":"Effect of Different Muscle Relaxation on Motor Control: Comparison Between Ballistic and Ramp Task Methods.","authors":"Hitomi Matsumoto, Yuma Takenaka, Tomotaka Suzuki, Naoko Shimadu, Kenichi Sugawara","doi":"10.1177/00315125251374115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The control of muscle relaxation is not simply the cessation of a muscle contraction, but a dynamic control mechanism for the next movement. Muscle relaxation is triggered by neurophysiological control of the central nervous system. Here, two relaxation strategies were compared, Ballistic and Ramp conditions, and the dynamics of excitability changes between the two relaxation strategies were analyzed. The Ballistic and Ramp conditions were established using visual triggers and response sounds from 20% of the maximum voluntary contraction output of the right wrist joint. The excitability of the motor cortex involved in the onset of relaxation was assessed using muscle tension or electromyography as an indicator for the onset of relaxation at -100, -50, and 0 ms. Transcranial magnetic stimulation was used to assess the excitability of the motor cortex at -100, -50, and 0 ms during the response onset tone and visual trigger. The H-reflex was derived from the flexor carpi radialis. There were no differences in the H-reflex between the conditions. In the Ballistic condition, the motor evoked potential was significantly higher at 0 ms, just before muscle relaxation, than at other time points (<i>p</i> < .05). In the Ramp condition, motor evoked potential was attenuated at 0 ms immediately before muscle relaxation compared with that at -100 ms (<i>p</i> < .05). During the onset of muscle relaxation, the excitability of the primary motor cortex showed a transient increase at different timings, depending on the relaxation method used. Thus, we can understand the key timing and methodology for the initiation of relaxation.</p>","PeriodicalId":19869,"journal":{"name":"Perceptual and Motor Skills","volume":" ","pages":"870-884"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perceptual and Motor Skills","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00315125251374115","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The control of muscle relaxation is not simply the cessation of a muscle contraction, but a dynamic control mechanism for the next movement. Muscle relaxation is triggered by neurophysiological control of the central nervous system. Here, two relaxation strategies were compared, Ballistic and Ramp conditions, and the dynamics of excitability changes between the two relaxation strategies were analyzed. The Ballistic and Ramp conditions were established using visual triggers and response sounds from 20% of the maximum voluntary contraction output of the right wrist joint. The excitability of the motor cortex involved in the onset of relaxation was assessed using muscle tension or electromyography as an indicator for the onset of relaxation at -100, -50, and 0 ms. Transcranial magnetic stimulation was used to assess the excitability of the motor cortex at -100, -50, and 0 ms during the response onset tone and visual trigger. The H-reflex was derived from the flexor carpi radialis. There were no differences in the H-reflex between the conditions. In the Ballistic condition, the motor evoked potential was significantly higher at 0 ms, just before muscle relaxation, than at other time points (p < .05). In the Ramp condition, motor evoked potential was attenuated at 0 ms immediately before muscle relaxation compared with that at -100 ms (p < .05). During the onset of muscle relaxation, the excitability of the primary motor cortex showed a transient increase at different timings, depending on the relaxation method used. Thus, we can understand the key timing and methodology for the initiation of relaxation.

不同肌肉放松对运动控制的影响:弹道和斜坡任务方法的比较。
肌肉放松的控制不是简单地停止肌肉收缩,而是对下一个动作的动态控制机制。肌肉放松是由中枢神经系统的神经生理控制触发的。本文比较了两种松弛策略,弹道和斜坡条件,并分析了两种松弛策略之间兴奋性变化的动力学。弹道和斜坡条件是通过视觉触发和反应声音从20%的最大自愿收缩输出右手腕关节建立。在-100、-50和0 ms时,用肌肉张力或肌电图作为松弛开始的指标来评估运动皮层参与松弛开始的兴奋性。经颅磁刺激评估运动皮层在-100、-50和0 ms时的兴奋性。h反射来自桡侧腕屈肌。两组间h反射无明显差异。在弹道条件下,肌肉松弛前0 ms运动诱发电位显著高于其他时间点(p < 0.05)。在坡道条件下,肌肉松弛前0 ms与-100 ms时相比,运动诱发电位有所减弱(p < 0.05)。在肌肉放松开始时,初级运动皮层的兴奋性在不同的时间表现出短暂的增加,这取决于所使用的放松方法。因此,我们可以了解开始放松的关键时机和方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Perceptual and Motor Skills
Perceptual and Motor Skills PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
110
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书