Sensorimotor and Sex Influence on Spatial Orientation when Sitting and Standing.

IF 2.4 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Perceptual and Motor Skills Pub Date : 2026-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-03 DOI:10.1177/00315125251372271
Josef Rask, Per-Anders Fransson, Rolf Johansson, Måns Magnusson, Fredrik Tjernström
{"title":"Sensorimotor and Sex Influence on Spatial Orientation when Sitting and Standing.","authors":"Josef Rask, Per-Anders Fransson, Rolf Johansson, Måns Magnusson, Fredrik Tjernström","doi":"10.1177/00315125251372271","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>When patients experience peripheral vestibular or certain central disorders causing dizziness or vertigo, this is sometimes associated with experiencing also disrupted spatial orientation, which may be accentuated by exposure to a distorted visual environment. This study explores the impact of sensorimotor factors and sex on spatial orientation in sitting and standing positions. In the Rod-and-Frame test, the participant views a rod - with and without a surrounding tilted frame - and is assigned to align the rod vertically or horizontally. A systematic misalignment of the rod due to the tilted frame is considered a visual field dependent behavior. Our objective was to determine whether healthy young adults perform the Rod-and-Frame test equally well when sitting and standing, and to determine the test-retest reliability. Twenty-four participants, 12 males and 12 females (M age = 25.5 years, standard deviation (SD) = 2.8 years) (males M age = 26.3 SD 3.1; females M age = 24.8 SD 2.4), performed identical Rod-and-Frame tests two times - exactly one week between the tests - in a completely dark room while standing and sitting. The participants were assigned to align a luminous rod horizontally and vertically with no frame of reference; with the rod surrounded by a luminous frame tilted 20° clockwise; and 20° counterclockwise. The participants were significantly more field dependent while sitting than while standing during the clockwise frame condition. Females were significantly more field dependent than males in the sitting clockwise and counterclockwise frame conditions. The test-retest evaluation was significantly non-zero for all test conditions and most ICC values were within the \"good reliability\" range. Thus, during the test conditions with increased sensorimotor information, the participants were less affected by distortive visual information. Additionally, females were more affected by distortive visual information than males while sitting. The Rod-and-Frame test proved robust, providing similar results when repeated.</p>","PeriodicalId":19869,"journal":{"name":"Perceptual and Motor Skills","volume":" ","pages":"849-869"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13320132/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perceptual and Motor Skills","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00315125251372271","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

When patients experience peripheral vestibular or certain central disorders causing dizziness or vertigo, this is sometimes associated with experiencing also disrupted spatial orientation, which may be accentuated by exposure to a distorted visual environment. This study explores the impact of sensorimotor factors and sex on spatial orientation in sitting and standing positions. In the Rod-and-Frame test, the participant views a rod - with and without a surrounding tilted frame - and is assigned to align the rod vertically or horizontally. A systematic misalignment of the rod due to the tilted frame is considered a visual field dependent behavior. Our objective was to determine whether healthy young adults perform the Rod-and-Frame test equally well when sitting and standing, and to determine the test-retest reliability. Twenty-four participants, 12 males and 12 females (M age = 25.5 years, standard deviation (SD) = 2.8 years) (males M age = 26.3 SD 3.1; females M age = 24.8 SD 2.4), performed identical Rod-and-Frame tests two times - exactly one week between the tests - in a completely dark room while standing and sitting. The participants were assigned to align a luminous rod horizontally and vertically with no frame of reference; with the rod surrounded by a luminous frame tilted 20° clockwise; and 20° counterclockwise. The participants were significantly more field dependent while sitting than while standing during the clockwise frame condition. Females were significantly more field dependent than males in the sitting clockwise and counterclockwise frame conditions. The test-retest evaluation was significantly non-zero for all test conditions and most ICC values were within the "good reliability" range. Thus, during the test conditions with increased sensorimotor information, the participants were less affected by distortive visual information. Additionally, females were more affected by distortive visual information than males while sitting. The Rod-and-Frame test proved robust, providing similar results when repeated.

感觉运动和性别对坐和站时空间取向的影响。
当患者出现外周前庭或某些中枢疾病引起头晕或眩晕时,这有时也与空间定向紊乱有关,这种情况可能因暴露于扭曲的视觉环境而加重。本研究探讨了感觉运动因素和性别对坐位和站位空间取向的影响。在棒子与框架测试中,参与者观看一根棒子——周围有或没有倾斜的框架——并被指定垂直或水平对齐棒子。由于倾斜的框架,杆的系统不对准被认为是一个视野依赖的行为。我们的目的是确定健康的年轻人在坐着和站着时是否同样表现良好,并确定重测信度。24名参与者,12名男性和12名女性(M年龄= 25.5岁,标准差(SD) = 2.8岁)(男性M年龄= 26.3 SD 3.1;女性M年龄= 24.8 SD 2.4),在一个完全黑暗的房间里,站着和坐着,进行了两次相同的杆架测试——两次测试之间正好间隔一周。参与者被要求在没有参照系的情况下水平和垂直对齐一根荧光棒;光杆周围有一个顺时针倾斜20°的发光框架;逆时针20°。在顺时针框架条件下,坐着的参与者明显比站着的参与者更依赖于视野。在顺时针和逆时针坐姿条件下,女性的场依赖性显著高于男性。在所有测试条件下,重测评估显著非零,大多数ICC值在“良好信度”范围内。因此,在增加感觉运动信息的测试条件下,参与者受扭曲视觉信息的影响较小。此外,坐着时,女性比男性更容易受到扭曲视觉信息的影响。杆架试验证明是可靠的,在重复试验时提供了类似的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Perceptual and Motor Skills
Perceptual and Motor Skills PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
110
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书