Nitrous Oxide Sourcing, Use and Harms: Insights From Australians Who Use Ecstasy/MDMA and Other Illicit Stimulants.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Jodie Grigg, Simon Lenton, Amy Peacock, Jessamine Soderstrom, Cate King, Natalie Thomas, Rachel Sutherland
{"title":"Nitrous Oxide Sourcing, Use and Harms: Insights From Australians Who Use Ecstasy/MDMA and Other Illicit Stimulants.","authors":"Jodie Grigg, Simon Lenton, Amy Peacock, Jessamine Soderstrom, Cate King, Natalie Thomas, Rachel Sutherland","doi":"10.1111/dar.70032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Increasing harms associated with nitrous oxide use have raised concerns, but limited evidence exists to inform harm reduction. This study aimed to identify how nitrous oxide is sourced, the products/forms used, awareness of health risks, engagement in harm reduction and experience of neurological symptoms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were collected via annual interviews (2021-2023) with cross-sectional convenience samples of Australians who regularly used ecstasy/MDMA and/or other illicit stimulants and reported past 6-month use of nitrous oxide (2021 n = 379; 2022 n = 315; 2023 n = 284).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The most commonly reported source of nitrous oxide in the past 6 months was convenience stores, followed by 24/7 delivery services. Sourcing from these retailers was also associated with heavier use. Reported use of larger cylinders (> 8 g) increased from 6% in 2021 to 26% in 2023. While most respondents demonstrated awareness of neurological risk (e.g., brain damage 63%; nerve damage 20%), only one-fifth identified the risk of Vitamin B12 depletion and 17% were unaware of any risks. Almost one-third (30%) reported limiting use per session, 36% limited frequency and 36% took no precautions. Reports of neurological symptoms rose from 5% in 2021 to 14% in 2023 among cross-sectional samples, with few (n ≤ 5) receiving treatment.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusions: </strong>Findings suggest increasing use of larger cylinders, alongside increasing neurological harms. Given the evolving regulatory and risk environment, close surveillance of usage and market trends is needed. The findings reinforce the need for balanced regulation and targeted education of retailers, clinicians and consumers to reduce harmful patterns of use and encourage early intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":11318,"journal":{"name":"Drug and alcohol review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug and alcohol review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/dar.70032","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Increasing harms associated with nitrous oxide use have raised concerns, but limited evidence exists to inform harm reduction. This study aimed to identify how nitrous oxide is sourced, the products/forms used, awareness of health risks, engagement in harm reduction and experience of neurological symptoms.

Methods: Data were collected via annual interviews (2021-2023) with cross-sectional convenience samples of Australians who regularly used ecstasy/MDMA and/or other illicit stimulants and reported past 6-month use of nitrous oxide (2021 n = 379; 2022 n = 315; 2023 n = 284).

Results: The most commonly reported source of nitrous oxide in the past 6 months was convenience stores, followed by 24/7 delivery services. Sourcing from these retailers was also associated with heavier use. Reported use of larger cylinders (> 8 g) increased from 6% in 2021 to 26% in 2023. While most respondents demonstrated awareness of neurological risk (e.g., brain damage 63%; nerve damage 20%), only one-fifth identified the risk of Vitamin B12 depletion and 17% were unaware of any risks. Almost one-third (30%) reported limiting use per session, 36% limited frequency and 36% took no precautions. Reports of neurological symptoms rose from 5% in 2021 to 14% in 2023 among cross-sectional samples, with few (n ≤ 5) receiving treatment.

Discussion and conclusions: Findings suggest increasing use of larger cylinders, alongside increasing neurological harms. Given the evolving regulatory and risk environment, close surveillance of usage and market trends is needed. The findings reinforce the need for balanced regulation and targeted education of retailers, clinicians and consumers to reduce harmful patterns of use and encourage early intervention.

一氧化二氮的来源,使用和危害:从使用摇头丸/MDMA和其他非法兴奋剂的澳大利亚人的见解。
导言:与使用一氧化二氮相关的危害日益增加引起了人们的关注,但现有的减少危害的证据有限。这项研究旨在确定一氧化二氮的来源、使用的产品/形式、对健康风险的认识、参与减少危害和神经系统症状的经历。方法:通过年度访谈(2021-2023)收集数据,这些横断面方便样本是经常使用摇头丸/MDMA和/或其他非法兴奋剂并报告过去6个月使用一氧化二氮的澳大利亚人(2021 n = 379; 2022 n = 315; 2023 n = 284)。结果:过去6个月报告的一氧化二氮最常见的来源是便利店,其次是24/7送货服务。从这些零售商那里采购也与更频繁的使用有关。据报道,大气缸(bbb80 g)的使用率从2021年的6%增加到2023年的26%。虽然大多数受访者表示意识到神经系统风险(例如,脑损伤63%;神经损伤20%),但只有五分之一的人认识到维生素B12缺乏的风险,17%的人不知道任何风险。近三分之一(30%)的人报告限制每次使用,36%的人限制频率,36%的人没有采取预防措施。在横断面样本中,神经系统症状的报告从2021年的5%上升到2023年的14%,接受治疗的病例很少(n≤5)。讨论和结论:研究结果表明越来越多地使用更大的钢瓶,同时增加神经损伤。鉴于不断变化的监管和风险环境,需要密切监测使用情况和市场趋势。研究结果表明,有必要对零售商、临床医生和消费者进行平衡的监管和有针对性的教育,以减少有害的使用模式,并鼓励早期干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Drug and alcohol review
Drug and alcohol review SUBSTANCE ABUSE-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
10.50%
发文量
151
期刊介绍: Drug and Alcohol Review is an international meeting ground for the views, expertise and experience of all those involved in studying alcohol, tobacco and drug problems. Contributors to the Journal examine and report on alcohol and drug use from a wide range of clinical, biomedical, epidemiological, psychological and sociological perspectives. Drug and Alcohol Review particularly encourages the submission of papers which have a harm reduction perspective. However, all philosophies will find a place in the Journal: the principal criterion for publication of papers is their quality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信