{"title":"Existence of Schrödinger Evolution with Absorbing Boundary Condition","authors":"Lawrence Frolov, Stefan Teufel, Roderich Tumulka","doi":"10.1007/s11040-025-09521-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Consider a non-relativistic quantum particle with wave function inside a region <span>\\(\\Omega \\subset \\mathbb {R}^3\\)</span>, and suppose that detectors are placed along the boundary <span>\\(\\partial \\Omega \\)</span>. The question how to compute the probability distribution of the time at which the detector surface registers the particle boils down to finding a reasonable mathematical definition of an ideal detecting surface; a particularly convincing definition, called the <i>absorbing boundary rule</i>, involves a time evolution for the particle’s wave function <span>\\(\\psi \\)</span> expressed by a Schrödinger equation in <span>\\(\\Omega \\)</span> together with an “absorbing” boundary condition on <span>\\(\\partial \\Omega \\)</span> first considered by Werner in 1987, viz., <span>\\(\\partial \\psi /\\partial n=i\\kappa \\psi \\)</span> with <span>\\(\\kappa >0\\)</span> and <span>\\(\\partial /\\partial n\\)</span> the normal derivative. We provide here a discussion of the rigorous mathematical foundation of this rule. First, for the viability of the rule it plays a crucial role that these two equations together uniquely define the time evolution of <span>\\(\\psi \\)</span>; we point out here how, under some technical assumptions on the regularity (i.e., smoothness) of the detecting surface, the Lumer-Phillips theorem implies that the time evolution is well defined and given by a contraction semigroup. Second, we show that the collapse required for the <i>N</i>-particle version of the problem is well defined. We also prove that the joint distribution of the detection times and places, according to the absorbing boundary rule, is governed by a positive-operator-valued measure.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":694,"journal":{"name":"Mathematical Physics, Analysis and Geometry","volume":"28 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11040-025-09521-3.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mathematical Physics, Analysis and Geometry","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11040-025-09521-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Consider a non-relativistic quantum particle with wave function inside a region \(\Omega \subset \mathbb {R}^3\), and suppose that detectors are placed along the boundary \(\partial \Omega \). The question how to compute the probability distribution of the time at which the detector surface registers the particle boils down to finding a reasonable mathematical definition of an ideal detecting surface; a particularly convincing definition, called the absorbing boundary rule, involves a time evolution for the particle’s wave function \(\psi \) expressed by a Schrödinger equation in \(\Omega \) together with an “absorbing” boundary condition on \(\partial \Omega \) first considered by Werner in 1987, viz., \(\partial \psi /\partial n=i\kappa \psi \) with \(\kappa >0\) and \(\partial /\partial n\) the normal derivative. We provide here a discussion of the rigorous mathematical foundation of this rule. First, for the viability of the rule it plays a crucial role that these two equations together uniquely define the time evolution of \(\psi \); we point out here how, under some technical assumptions on the regularity (i.e., smoothness) of the detecting surface, the Lumer-Phillips theorem implies that the time evolution is well defined and given by a contraction semigroup. Second, we show that the collapse required for the N-particle version of the problem is well defined. We also prove that the joint distribution of the detection times and places, according to the absorbing boundary rule, is governed by a positive-operator-valued measure.
期刊介绍:
MPAG is a peer-reviewed journal organized in sections. Each section is editorially independent and provides a high forum for research articles in the respective areas.
The entire editorial board commits itself to combine the requirements of an accurate and fast refereeing process.
The section on Probability and Statistical Physics focuses on probabilistic models and spatial stochastic processes arising in statistical physics. Examples include: interacting particle systems, non-equilibrium statistical mechanics, integrable probability, random graphs and percolation, critical phenomena and conformal theories. Applications of probability theory and statistical physics to other areas of mathematics, such as analysis (stochastic pde''s), random geometry, combinatorial aspects are also addressed.
The section on Quantum Theory publishes research papers on developments in geometry, probability and analysis that are relevant to quantum theory. Topics that are covered in this section include: classical and algebraic quantum field theories, deformation and geometric quantisation, index theory, Lie algebras and Hopf algebras, non-commutative geometry, spectral theory for quantum systems, disordered quantum systems (Anderson localization, quantum diffusion), many-body quantum physics with applications to condensed matter theory, partial differential equations emerging from quantum theory, quantum lattice systems, topological phases of matter, equilibrium and non-equilibrium quantum statistical mechanics, multiscale analysis, rigorous renormalisation group.