{"title":"Quality of Life Across the Anorexia Nervosa Spectrum: A Comparative Study of Current, Weight-Restored, and Healthy Individuals","authors":"Stephanie Miles, Erica Neill, Andrea Phillipou","doi":"10.1002/eat.24506","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Anorexia nervosa (AN) is a serious mental illness that can greatly impact quality of life (QoL). While research suggests that health-related QoL is poor in current AN, limited studies have examined QoL in those recovering from AN. This study aimed to investigate health-related QoL in people with current AN, those weight-restored from AN, and healthy controls (HCs).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Participants were 15 women with current AN, 12 weight-restored women, and 15 HC women. Health-related QoL was assessed using the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL-8D). Group differences were analyzed using analyses of variance with a priori contrasts.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The current AN group scored significantly lower than the weight-restored AN and HC groups on the AQoL-8D subscales of independent living, mental health, happiness, relationships, and self-worth. The weight-restored AN group scored equivalently to HCs in QoL. No group differences were found for the pain subscale.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>Findings highlight the substantial impact of AN on QoL and the potential for QoL to improve with recovery, which could motivate treatment engagement.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51067,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Eating Disorders","volume":"58 10","pages":"2009-2014"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/eat.24506","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Eating Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eat.24506","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Anorexia nervosa (AN) is a serious mental illness that can greatly impact quality of life (QoL). While research suggests that health-related QoL is poor in current AN, limited studies have examined QoL in those recovering from AN. This study aimed to investigate health-related QoL in people with current AN, those weight-restored from AN, and healthy controls (HCs).
Methods
Participants were 15 women with current AN, 12 weight-restored women, and 15 HC women. Health-related QoL was assessed using the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL-8D). Group differences were analyzed using analyses of variance with a priori contrasts.
Results
The current AN group scored significantly lower than the weight-restored AN and HC groups on the AQoL-8D subscales of independent living, mental health, happiness, relationships, and self-worth. The weight-restored AN group scored equivalently to HCs in QoL. No group differences were found for the pain subscale.
Discussion
Findings highlight the substantial impact of AN on QoL and the potential for QoL to improve with recovery, which could motivate treatment engagement.
期刊介绍:
Articles featured in the journal describe state-of-the-art scientific research on theory, methodology, etiology, clinical practice, and policy related to eating disorders, as well as contributions that facilitate scholarly critique and discussion of science and practice in the field. Theoretical and empirical work on obesity or healthy eating falls within the journal’s scope inasmuch as it facilitates the advancement of efforts to describe and understand, prevent, or treat eating disorders. IJED welcomes submissions from all regions of the world and representing all levels of inquiry (including basic science, clinical trials, implementation research, and dissemination studies), and across a full range of scientific methods, disciplines, and approaches.