Linda Booij, Emily Mizzi, Samantha Ginsberg, Howard Steiger
{"title":"Restrictive and Binge-Purge OSFED Variants: Clinical Features and Comparisons With Classical Eating Disorders.","authors":"Linda Booij, Emily Mizzi, Samantha Ginsberg, Howard Steiger","doi":"10.1002/eat.24533","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Current diagnostic nomenclature includes \"atypical\" eating disorders (EDs) under the term other specified feeding or eating disorder (OSFED). Previous studies suggest that individuals with OSFED have similar psychological and concurrent symptoms to individuals with \"classical\" EDs. Our study compared people with OSFED to those with classical EDs on indices reflecting ED pathology, concurrent psychological symptoms, personality traits, functional impairment, illness duration, and pretreatment motivation. We also compared OSFED variants characterized solely by restrictive eating behaviors (OSFED-R) to variants in which binge-eating and/or purging symptoms predominated (OSFED-B/P).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were 836 treatment-seeking adults (185 AN-Restricting type [AN-R], 165 AN Binge-eating/purging type [AN-B/P], 276 BN, 104 OSFED-R, and 106 OSFED-B/P) starting outpatient ED treatment. Data were analyzed with generalized linear models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, findings in individuals with OSFED were comparable to those in people with a \"classical\" ED diagnosis on self-reported measures of concurrent psychological symptoms, personality traits, functional impairment, illness duration, and treatment motivation. However, relative to people with AN-R, individuals with OSFED-R reported higher levels of psychological ED symptoms (p < 0.001). The OSFED-B/P group had even more ED-related psychological symptoms than did the OSFED-R group (p = 0.02), but did not differ from the AN-B/P and BN groups on any of our indices.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Findings extend previous research, underscoring the point that OSFED syndromes have serious clinical implications, comparable to those associated with full-threshold AN and BN. Results also highlight the relevance of examining heterogeneity within the OSFED category in function of a restrictive vs. binge/purge distinction.</p>","PeriodicalId":51067,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Eating Disorders","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Eating Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.24533","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Current diagnostic nomenclature includes "atypical" eating disorders (EDs) under the term other specified feeding or eating disorder (OSFED). Previous studies suggest that individuals with OSFED have similar psychological and concurrent symptoms to individuals with "classical" EDs. Our study compared people with OSFED to those with classical EDs on indices reflecting ED pathology, concurrent psychological symptoms, personality traits, functional impairment, illness duration, and pretreatment motivation. We also compared OSFED variants characterized solely by restrictive eating behaviors (OSFED-R) to variants in which binge-eating and/or purging symptoms predominated (OSFED-B/P).
Methods: Participants were 836 treatment-seeking adults (185 AN-Restricting type [AN-R], 165 AN Binge-eating/purging type [AN-B/P], 276 BN, 104 OSFED-R, and 106 OSFED-B/P) starting outpatient ED treatment. Data were analyzed with generalized linear models.
Results: Overall, findings in individuals with OSFED were comparable to those in people with a "classical" ED diagnosis on self-reported measures of concurrent psychological symptoms, personality traits, functional impairment, illness duration, and treatment motivation. However, relative to people with AN-R, individuals with OSFED-R reported higher levels of psychological ED symptoms (p < 0.001). The OSFED-B/P group had even more ED-related psychological symptoms than did the OSFED-R group (p = 0.02), but did not differ from the AN-B/P and BN groups on any of our indices.
Discussion: Findings extend previous research, underscoring the point that OSFED syndromes have serious clinical implications, comparable to those associated with full-threshold AN and BN. Results also highlight the relevance of examining heterogeneity within the OSFED category in function of a restrictive vs. binge/purge distinction.
目的:目前的诊断术语包括“非典型”饮食失调(EDs)在其他特定喂养或饮食失调(OSFED)下。先前的研究表明,OSFED患者与“经典”ed患者具有相似的心理和并发症状。我们的研究比较了OSFED患者与经典ED患者在ED病理、并发心理症状、人格特征、功能障碍、病程和预处理动机等指标上的差异。我们还比较了仅以限制性饮食行为为特征的OSFED变体(OSFED- r)和以暴食和/或排便症状为主的变体(OSFED- b /P)。方法:参与者为836名寻求治疗的成年人(185名AN-限制性型[AN- r], 165名AN- b /P型暴食/泻型[AN- b /P], 276名BN型,104名OSFED-R型和106名OSFED-B/P型),开始门诊ED治疗。数据用广义线性模型进行分析。结果:总体而言,在并发心理症状、人格特征、功能障碍、病程和治疗动机的自我报告测量方面,OSFED患者的发现与“经典”ED诊断患者相当。然而,相对于AN- r患者,OSFED- r患者报告的心理ED症状水平更高(p讨论:研究结果扩展了先前的研究,强调了OSFED综合征具有严重的临床意义,与全阈值AN和BN相关的症状相当。结果还强调了在限制性与暴食/清除区分的功能中检查OSFED类别异质性的相关性。
期刊介绍:
Articles featured in the journal describe state-of-the-art scientific research on theory, methodology, etiology, clinical practice, and policy related to eating disorders, as well as contributions that facilitate scholarly critique and discussion of science and practice in the field. Theoretical and empirical work on obesity or healthy eating falls within the journal’s scope inasmuch as it facilitates the advancement of efforts to describe and understand, prevent, or treat eating disorders. IJED welcomes submissions from all regions of the world and representing all levels of inquiry (including basic science, clinical trials, implementation research, and dissemination studies), and across a full range of scientific methods, disciplines, and approaches.