M Simonet, C Vater, C Abati, S Zhong, P Mavros, A Schwering, M Raubal, C Hölscher, J Krukar
{"title":"Probing mental representations of space through sketch mapping: a scoping review.","authors":"M Simonet, C Vater, C Abati, S Zhong, P Mavros, A Schwering, M Raubal, C Hölscher, J Krukar","doi":"10.1186/s41235-025-00667-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cognitive maps are mental representations of space essential for guiding spatial behavior. To assess the properties of these cognitive maps, sketch mapping has been widely used as a research tool in spatial cognition research. This scoping review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the methodologies and the cognitive processes concerning the externalization of cognitive maps through sketch mapping. Following the PRISMA-ScR checklist (Tricco et al. in Ann Intern Med 169(7):467-473, 2018, https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850 ), a comprehensive search from five electronic databases was performed with predefined combinations of keywords. Twenty-four articles were selected and analyzed, covering a wide range of methods: traditional pen-and-paper sketching (n = 18 studies); combination of pen-and-paper and digital sketching (n = 1); exclusively digital sketching (n = 4); and digital VR sketching (n = 1). With regard to the formation of cognitive maps in environmental scale spaces, studies employed either direct experience or virtual experience of unfamiliar environments, videos, maps, or retrieval from own memory. This review highlights the inherent conflict between sketch maps' advantages in capturing knowledge in less structured experimental protocols and researchers' need for structured quantification of their quality, as well as the underused diversity of media through which sketch maps can be produced for appropriate scenarios. We encourage researchers to (a) increase the precision in reporting the cognitive processes being investigated with sketch maps (e.g., short-term vs. long-term memory), (b) rely on established data analysis methods instead of developing custom measures for each study, and (c) consider alternative media beyond pen and paper when more suitable to the experimental context.</p>","PeriodicalId":46827,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Research-Principles and Implications","volume":"10 1","pages":"59"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12408434/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Research-Principles and Implications","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-025-00667-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Cognitive maps are mental representations of space essential for guiding spatial behavior. To assess the properties of these cognitive maps, sketch mapping has been widely used as a research tool in spatial cognition research. This scoping review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the methodologies and the cognitive processes concerning the externalization of cognitive maps through sketch mapping. Following the PRISMA-ScR checklist (Tricco et al. in Ann Intern Med 169(7):467-473, 2018, https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850 ), a comprehensive search from five electronic databases was performed with predefined combinations of keywords. Twenty-four articles were selected and analyzed, covering a wide range of methods: traditional pen-and-paper sketching (n = 18 studies); combination of pen-and-paper and digital sketching (n = 1); exclusively digital sketching (n = 4); and digital VR sketching (n = 1). With regard to the formation of cognitive maps in environmental scale spaces, studies employed either direct experience or virtual experience of unfamiliar environments, videos, maps, or retrieval from own memory. This review highlights the inherent conflict between sketch maps' advantages in capturing knowledge in less structured experimental protocols and researchers' need for structured quantification of their quality, as well as the underused diversity of media through which sketch maps can be produced for appropriate scenarios. We encourage researchers to (a) increase the precision in reporting the cognitive processes being investigated with sketch maps (e.g., short-term vs. long-term memory), (b) rely on established data analysis methods instead of developing custom measures for each study, and (c) consider alternative media beyond pen and paper when more suitable to the experimental context.
认知地图是空间的心理表征,对指导空间行为至关重要。为了评估这些认知地图的性质,草图地图作为一种研究工具被广泛应用于空间认知研究。这篇综述的目的是提供一个全面概述的方法和认知过程的外部化认知地图通过草图绘制。根据PRISMA-ScR检查表(Tricco et al. in Ann Intern Med 169(7):467-473, 2018, https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850),使用预定义的关键词组合从五个电子数据库中进行全面搜索。选取并分析了24篇文章,涵盖了广泛的方法:传统的笔和纸素描(n = 18研究);纸笔与数码写生结合(n = 1);独家数字素描(n = 4);数字VR素描(n = 1)。关于环境尺度空间中认知地图的形成,研究采用了对陌生环境、视频、地图的直接体验或虚拟体验,或从自己的记忆中检索。这篇综述强调了素描图在较少结构化的实验方案中获取知识方面的优势与研究人员对其质量进行结构化量化的需求之间的内在冲突,以及未充分利用的媒介多样性,通过这些媒介可以为适当的场景制作素描图。我们鼓励研究人员(a)提高用草图报告认知过程的准确性(例如,短期记忆与长期记忆),(b)依靠已建立的数据分析方法,而不是为每项研究开发定制的测量方法,以及(c)在更适合实验背景时考虑纸笔以外的替代媒体。