Not a Trainee, Not Yet Mid-Career: Navigating being an Early Career Pediatric Psychologist.

IF 0.9 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Clinical Practice in Pediatric Psychology Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-09 DOI:10.1037/cpp0000546
Colleen Stiles-Shields, Emily G Lattie, Kathryn Macapagal, Alexandra M Psihogios
{"title":"Not a Trainee, Not Yet Mid-Career: Navigating being an Early Career Pediatric Psychologist.","authors":"Colleen Stiles-Shields, Emily G Lattie, Kathryn Macapagal, Alexandra M Psihogios","doi":"10.1037/cpp0000546","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The American Psychological Association (APA) defines early career (EC) status as occurring in the 10 years following earning a doctorate. As EC pediatric and behavioral health psychologists (ECPP) who work with and conduct research with adolescents and young adults (AYA), we have noted that our own and our peers' experiences during this career phase have mirrored that of our AYA research participants and patients. Namely, no longer scaffolded by training milestones and supervision, yet still often viewed as green, EC psychologists may often feel and be treated like they are experiencing a career-based emerging adulthood. Despite the presence of some institutional support during this career phase, we and our peers have found difficulty in navigating this career phase-something compounded by concurrent life events (e.g., parenting, pandemic).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Grounded in our own current and recent histories, this Commentary provides examples of common experiences across the EC--from fellowship to nearing mid-career.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>To improve the EC experience for pediatric psychologists and beyond, recommendations are made at the institutional, mentor, and ECPP-levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Given the risks for burnout during this phase of career, when workforce demands are at all-time high, this Commentary aims to draw attention to the developmental norms of EC and to improve the EC experience for pediatric psychologists and our peers. The hope is that in doing so, pediatric patients and their families may be better served via a well-supported EC workforce.</p>","PeriodicalId":37641,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Practice in Pediatric Psychology","volume":"13 3","pages":"327-333"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12377528/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Practice in Pediatric Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/cpp0000546","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The American Psychological Association (APA) defines early career (EC) status as occurring in the 10 years following earning a doctorate. As EC pediatric and behavioral health psychologists (ECPP) who work with and conduct research with adolescents and young adults (AYA), we have noted that our own and our peers' experiences during this career phase have mirrored that of our AYA research participants and patients. Namely, no longer scaffolded by training milestones and supervision, yet still often viewed as green, EC psychologists may often feel and be treated like they are experiencing a career-based emerging adulthood. Despite the presence of some institutional support during this career phase, we and our peers have found difficulty in navigating this career phase-something compounded by concurrent life events (e.g., parenting, pandemic).

Method: Grounded in our own current and recent histories, this Commentary provides examples of common experiences across the EC--from fellowship to nearing mid-career.

Results: To improve the EC experience for pediatric psychologists and beyond, recommendations are made at the institutional, mentor, and ECPP-levels.

Conclusions: Given the risks for burnout during this phase of career, when workforce demands are at all-time high, this Commentary aims to draw attention to the developmental norms of EC and to improve the EC experience for pediatric psychologists and our peers. The hope is that in doing so, pediatric patients and their families may be better served via a well-supported EC workforce.

不是见习生,还不是职业中期:如何成为一名早期的儿科心理学家。
目的:美国心理协会(APA)将早期职业(EC)状态定义为获得博士学位后的10年。作为EC儿科和行为健康心理学家(ECPP),我们与青少年和年轻人(AYA)一起工作并进行研究,我们注意到,我们自己和同龄人在这个职业阶段的经历反映了我们的AYA研究参与者和患者的经历。也就是说,不再受培训里程碑和监督的束缚,但仍然经常被视为新手,EC心理学家可能经常感觉和对待他们就像正在经历一个以职业为基础的新兴成年期。尽管在这个职业阶段有一些制度上的支持,但我们和我们的同龄人在度过这个职业阶段时发现了困难——一些同时发生的生活事件(例如,养育子女,流行病)加剧了这种困难。方法:根据我们自己当前和最近的历史,这篇评论提供了欧共体的共同经历的例子——从团契到接近中期的职业生涯。结果:为了提高儿科心理学家和其他领域的EC体验,在机构、导师和ecpp层面提出了建议。结论:考虑到职业生涯这一阶段的职业倦怠风险,当劳动力需求处于历史最高水平时,本评论旨在引起对EC发展规范的关注,并改善儿科心理学家和我们的同行的EC体验。希望这样做,儿科患者和他们的家庭可以通过良好的支持EC工作人员更好地服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Practice in Pediatric Psychology
Clinical Practice in Pediatric Psychology Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
18.20%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: Clinical Practice in Pediatric Psychology® publishes articles representing the professional and applied activities of pediatric psychology. The journal comprehensively describes the breadth and richness of the field in its diverse activities;complements the scientific development of the field with information on the applied/clinical side;provides modeling that addresses the ways practicing pediatric psychologists incorporate empirical literature into day-to-day activities;emphasizes work that incorporates and cites evidence from the science base; andprovides a forum for those engaged in primarily clinical activities to report on their activities and inform future research activities. Articles include a range of formats such as commentaries, reviews, and clinical case reports in addition to more traditional empirical clinical studies. Articles address issues such as: professional and training activities in pediatric psychology and interprofessional functioning;funding/reimbursement patterns and the evaluation of the cost-effectiveness of clinical services;program development;organization of clinical services and workforce analyses;applications of evidence based interventions in "real world" settings with particular attention to potential barriers and solutions and considerations of diverse populations;critical analyses of professional practice issues;clinical innovations, e.g., emerging use of technology in clinical practice;case studies, particularly case studies that have enough detail to be replicated and that provide a basis for larger scale intervention studies; andorganizational, state and federal policies as they impact the practice of pediatric psychology, with a particular emphasis on changes due to health care reform.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信