Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) Now and into the Future: Multi-Stakeholder Perspectives on Optimizing PRO Evidence Use in Decision-Making across the US Healthcare Continuum.
{"title":"Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) Now and into the Future: Multi-Stakeholder Perspectives on Optimizing PRO Evidence Use in Decision-Making across the US Healthcare Continuum.","authors":"Sharan Randhawa, Adam Gater, Roy Bentley","doi":"10.1016/j.jval.2025.08.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are tools intended to capture directly from patients how they feel and/or function. They can provide important evidence to support regulatory approval, product labeling, payer reimbursement, and clinical care decisions. However, patient-reported outcome (PRO) evidence remains underutilized in regulatory, payer, and overall healthcare decision-making. This initiative aimed to understand stakeholder perspectives regarding current use of PRO evidence across the US healthcare continuum and opportunities to further advance its use in healthcare-related decision-making.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three roundtable meetings were convened with an expert panel representing patients/patient advocacy groups, clinicians, PRO experts, payers/purchasers, and policymakers. Meetings were audio-recorded and transcripts were reviewed to identify key discussion points and themes via thematic analysis methods. Group members reviewed, discussed, and commented on findings as they emerged.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The themes that emerged on maximizing use of PRO evidence were: 1. Educating stakeholders on its value; 2. Ensuring standardization of PROM development methods, including maximizing patient engagement; 3. Addressing PROM implementation considerations in clinical trials and practice; 4. Effectively communicating PRO evidence to stakeholders; and 5. Encouraging PRO evidence integration into policy and shared clinical decision-making. A five-component framework resulted.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PRO evidence is fundamental to patient-focused drug development and clinical care. Collaboration among all stakeholders making decisions related to treatment approval, access, and use is critical to realizing the value of PRO evidence, alongside greater stakeholder transparency regarding how PRO evidence is used to inform decisions. The five-component framework, co-developed by a multistakeholder expert panel, can help to support and enhance these collaborations.</p>","PeriodicalId":23508,"journal":{"name":"Value in Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Value in Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2025.08.008","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are tools intended to capture directly from patients how they feel and/or function. They can provide important evidence to support regulatory approval, product labeling, payer reimbursement, and clinical care decisions. However, patient-reported outcome (PRO) evidence remains underutilized in regulatory, payer, and overall healthcare decision-making. This initiative aimed to understand stakeholder perspectives regarding current use of PRO evidence across the US healthcare continuum and opportunities to further advance its use in healthcare-related decision-making.
Methods: Three roundtable meetings were convened with an expert panel representing patients/patient advocacy groups, clinicians, PRO experts, payers/purchasers, and policymakers. Meetings were audio-recorded and transcripts were reviewed to identify key discussion points and themes via thematic analysis methods. Group members reviewed, discussed, and commented on findings as they emerged.
Results: The themes that emerged on maximizing use of PRO evidence were: 1. Educating stakeholders on its value; 2. Ensuring standardization of PROM development methods, including maximizing patient engagement; 3. Addressing PROM implementation considerations in clinical trials and practice; 4. Effectively communicating PRO evidence to stakeholders; and 5. Encouraging PRO evidence integration into policy and shared clinical decision-making. A five-component framework resulted.
Conclusions: PRO evidence is fundamental to patient-focused drug development and clinical care. Collaboration among all stakeholders making decisions related to treatment approval, access, and use is critical to realizing the value of PRO evidence, alongside greater stakeholder transparency regarding how PRO evidence is used to inform decisions. The five-component framework, co-developed by a multistakeholder expert panel, can help to support and enhance these collaborations.
期刊介绍:
Value in Health contains original research articles for pharmacoeconomics, health economics, and outcomes research (clinical, economic, and patient-reported outcomes/preference-based research), as well as conceptual and health policy articles that provide valuable information for health care decision-makers as well as the research community. As the official journal of ISPOR, Value in Health provides a forum for researchers, as well as health care decision-makers to translate outcomes research into health care decisions.