Nalbuphine as a Potential Alternative to Morphine in Sickle Cell Disease Patients with Vaso-occlusive Crisis: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

IF 1.5 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Mohannad Alghamdi, Mohamed Almulhim, Qasem Almulihi, Yousef A Alhamaid, Mohammad Assiri, Abdullah Alzahid, Basmah Al Ghanim, Lama Albaish, Lama Alkhunaizi, Shahad Alali, Layan Alshehri
{"title":"Nalbuphine as a Potential Alternative to Morphine in Sickle Cell Disease Patients with Vaso-occlusive Crisis: A Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Mohannad Alghamdi, Mohamed Almulhim, Qasem Almulihi, Yousef A Alhamaid, Mohammad Assiri, Abdullah Alzahid, Basmah Al Ghanim, Lama Albaish, Lama Alkhunaizi, Shahad Alali, Layan Alshehri","doi":"10.4103/sjmms.sjmms_601_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of morphine in managing vaso-occlusive crisis (VOC) in patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) can result in significant side effects. Nalbuphine, a mixed agonist-antagonist opioid, may offer an alternative with fewer complications.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the efficacy and safety of nalbuphine and morphine in pain management among adult SCD patients presenting with VOC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included adult patients with SCD treated at King Fahad Hospital, Hofuf, Saudi Arabia, between 2019 and 2023. Patients were classified into two groups (receiving morphine and nalbuphine). Pain levels were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at baseline, 1-h, 6-h, and 24-h post-administration. Additional outcomes included the need for rescue medication and discharge rates from the emergency department.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 234 patients were included (morphine: 120; nalbuphine: 114). The mean age of the cohort was 30.5 ± 8.7 years, and 63.8% were female. Baseline laboratory data indicated mean hemoglobin of 8.5 g/dL and elevated lactate dehydrogenase (576.9 U/L). At 6 h, 10% and 20% of patients on morphine and nalbuphine, respectively, reported no pain (<i>P</i> = 0.013). At 24 h, 30% and 40% of patients on nalbuphine and 15% and 25% on morphine experienced no pain and mild pain, respectively (<i>P</i> = 0.00002). Nalbuphine patients required less rescue medication (41% vs. 59%, <i>P</i> = 0.009) and had higher discharge rates from the emergency department (70% vs. 46%, <i>P</i> = 0.0003). No significant difference was found in the incidence of acute chest syndrome or ICU admissions between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Nalbuphine can be a potential alternative for vaso-occlusive crisis pain management in sickle cell disease patients, as it demonstrated superior efficacy compared with morphine, especially at later time points, with reduced need for rescue medication and earlier discharge.</p>","PeriodicalId":21442,"journal":{"name":"Saudi Journal of Medicine & Medical Sciences","volume":"13 3","pages":"181-188"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12366906/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saudi Journal of Medicine & Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/sjmms.sjmms_601_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The use of morphine in managing vaso-occlusive crisis (VOC) in patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) can result in significant side effects. Nalbuphine, a mixed agonist-antagonist opioid, may offer an alternative with fewer complications.

Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of nalbuphine and morphine in pain management among adult SCD patients presenting with VOC.

Methods: This retrospective study included adult patients with SCD treated at King Fahad Hospital, Hofuf, Saudi Arabia, between 2019 and 2023. Patients were classified into two groups (receiving morphine and nalbuphine). Pain levels were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at baseline, 1-h, 6-h, and 24-h post-administration. Additional outcomes included the need for rescue medication and discharge rates from the emergency department.

Results: A total of 234 patients were included (morphine: 120; nalbuphine: 114). The mean age of the cohort was 30.5 ± 8.7 years, and 63.8% were female. Baseline laboratory data indicated mean hemoglobin of 8.5 g/dL and elevated lactate dehydrogenase (576.9 U/L). At 6 h, 10% and 20% of patients on morphine and nalbuphine, respectively, reported no pain (P = 0.013). At 24 h, 30% and 40% of patients on nalbuphine and 15% and 25% on morphine experienced no pain and mild pain, respectively (P = 0.00002). Nalbuphine patients required less rescue medication (41% vs. 59%, P = 0.009) and had higher discharge rates from the emergency department (70% vs. 46%, P = 0.0003). No significant difference was found in the incidence of acute chest syndrome or ICU admissions between the two groups.

Conclusion: Nalbuphine can be a potential alternative for vaso-occlusive crisis pain management in sickle cell disease patients, as it demonstrated superior efficacy compared with morphine, especially at later time points, with reduced need for rescue medication and earlier discharge.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

纳布啡作为镰状细胞病患者血管闭塞危象吗啡的潜在替代品:一项回顾性队列研究
背景:使用吗啡治疗镰状细胞病(SCD)患者的血管闭塞危象(VOC)可能导致明显的副作用。纳布芬,一种混合激动剂-拮抗剂阿片类药物,可能是一种并发症较少的选择。目的:比较纳布啡与吗啡治疗伴有VOC的成年SCD患者疼痛的疗效和安全性。方法:本回顾性研究纳入了2019年至2023年在沙特阿拉伯胡富夫法赫德国王医院治疗的成年SCD患者。患者分为两组(吗啡组和纳布啡组)。采用视觉模拟评分(VAS)在给药后基线、1小时、6小时和24小时评估疼痛水平。其他结果包括急救药物的需求和急诊科的出院率。结果:共纳入234例患者(吗啡120例,纳布啡114例)。该队列的平均年龄为30.5±8.7岁,女性占63.8%。基线实验室数据显示平均血红蛋白为8.5 g/dL,乳酸脱氢酶升高(576.9 U/L)。6小时时,分别有10%和20%使用吗啡和纳布啡的患者报告无疼痛(P = 0.013)。24 h时,纳布啡组30%和40%的患者无疼痛感,吗啡组15%和25%的患者有轻微疼痛感(P = 0.00002)。使用纳布芬的患者需要较少的抢救药物(41%对59%,P = 0.009),急诊科的出院率更高(70%对46%,P = 0.0003)。两组急性胸综合征发生率及ICU入院率无显著差异。结论:纳布啡可作为镰状细胞病患者血管闭塞性危重疼痛治疗的潜在替代方案,与吗啡相比,其疗效优于吗啡,特别是在较晚的时间点,减少了对抢救药物的需求,提前出院。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Saudi Journal of Medicine & Medical Sciences
Saudi Journal of Medicine & Medical Sciences MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Saudi Journal of Medicine & Medical Sciences (SJMMS) is the official scientific journal of Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University. It is an international peer-reviewed, general medical journal. The scope of the Journal is to publish research that will be of interest to health specialties both in academic and clinical practice. The Journal aims at disseminating high-powered research results with the objective of turning research into knowledge. It seeks to promote scholarly publishing in medicine and medical sciences. The Journal is published in print and online. The target readers of the Journal include all medical and health professionals in the health cluster such as in medicine, dentistry, nursing, applied medical sciences, clinical pharmacology, public health, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信