Dementia in Intellectual Disability: An Exploratory Investigation of Comorbidity Patterns and Diagnostic Outcomes.

IF 2 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Peer C Keller, Tanja Sappok
{"title":"Dementia in Intellectual Disability: An Exploratory Investigation of Comorbidity Patterns and Diagnostic Outcomes.","authors":"Peer C Keller, Tanja Sappok","doi":"10.1111/jir.70016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dementia is more prevalent and tends to manifest earlier in individuals with intellectual disabilities (ID) compared to the general population. Acquiring specific knowledge about comorbidities and diagnostic findings in individuals with ID who have dementia, as opposed to those with ID without dementia, is essential. Such insights are crucial for enhancing the quality of care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was applied in a German outpatient clinic for people with ID and mental illnesses from February 2018 to September 2022. An exploratory comparison was conducted to identify differences in somatic and psychiatric comorbidities, laboratory results, cerebrospinal fluid results, neuroimaging, medication and challenging behaviour in people with ID with (n = 13, mean age: 54 years, 69% female) and without dementia (n = 73, mean age: 53 years, 48% female).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this sample, persons with ID who have dementia are more likely to have Down syndrome and less likely to have affective disorders. They received antidementia drugs more often and atypical high-potency antipsychotics less often compared to persons with ID without dementia. All other clinical data showed no differences.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Interestingly, no differences in somatic diseases (except Down syndrome) or laboratory and neuroimaging results could be found between people with ID with and without dementia. However, the diagnosis of dementia was associated with a reduced frequency of affective disorders and a reduced prescription of antipsychotics compared to the clinical sample without dementia. Due to the exploratory character of the study, replication in a much larger sample is necessary.</p>","PeriodicalId":16163,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual Disability Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intellectual Disability Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jir.70016","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Dementia is more prevalent and tends to manifest earlier in individuals with intellectual disabilities (ID) compared to the general population. Acquiring specific knowledge about comorbidities and diagnostic findings in individuals with ID who have dementia, as opposed to those with ID without dementia, is essential. Such insights are crucial for enhancing the quality of care.

Methods: The study was applied in a German outpatient clinic for people with ID and mental illnesses from February 2018 to September 2022. An exploratory comparison was conducted to identify differences in somatic and psychiatric comorbidities, laboratory results, cerebrospinal fluid results, neuroimaging, medication and challenging behaviour in people with ID with (n = 13, mean age: 54 years, 69% female) and without dementia (n = 73, mean age: 53 years, 48% female).

Results: In this sample, persons with ID who have dementia are more likely to have Down syndrome and less likely to have affective disorders. They received antidementia drugs more often and atypical high-potency antipsychotics less often compared to persons with ID without dementia. All other clinical data showed no differences.

Conclusions: Interestingly, no differences in somatic diseases (except Down syndrome) or laboratory and neuroimaging results could be found between people with ID with and without dementia. However, the diagnosis of dementia was associated with a reduced frequency of affective disorders and a reduced prescription of antipsychotics compared to the clinical sample without dementia. Due to the exploratory character of the study, replication in a much larger sample is necessary.

智障痴呆:合并症模式和诊断结果的探索性调查。
背景:与一般人群相比,痴呆症在智力残疾(ID)个体中更为普遍,而且往往表现得更早。与无痴呆的ID患者相比,获取ID患者的合并症和诊断结果的具体知识是至关重要的。这些见解对于提高护理质量至关重要。方法:该研究于2018年2月至2022年9月在德国一家身份证和精神疾病患者门诊进行。进行了一项探索性比较,以确定有(n = 13,平均年龄:54岁,69%为女性)和无痴呆(n = 73,平均年龄:53岁,48%为女性)的ID患者在身体和精神合并症、实验室结果、脑脊液结果、神经影像学、药物和挑战性行为方面的差异。结果:在这个样本中,患有痴呆症的ID患者患唐氏综合症的可能性更大,患情感障碍的可能性更小。与无痴呆的ID患者相比,他们接受抗痴呆药物的频率更高,而非典型高效抗精神病药物的频率更低。其他临床数据均无差异。结论:有趣的是,在患有和不患有痴呆症的ID患者之间,没有发现躯体疾病(唐氏综合征除外)或实验室和神经影像学结果的差异。然而,与没有痴呆症的临床样本相比,痴呆症的诊断与情感障碍的频率降低和抗精神病药物的处方减少有关。由于这项研究的探索性,在更大的样本中进行复制是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
5.60%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: The Journal of Intellectual Disability Research is devoted exclusively to the scientific study of intellectual disability and publishes papers reporting original observations in this field. The subject matter is broad and includes, but is not restricted to, findings from biological, educational, genetic, medical, psychiatric, psychological and sociological studies, and ethical, philosophical, and legal contributions that increase knowledge on the treatment and prevention of intellectual disability and of associated impairments and disabilities, and/or inform public policy and practice. Expert reviews on themes in which recent research has produced notable advances will be included. Such reviews will normally be by invitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信