Salience and tolerance are not indicators of problematic social media use: Evidence from the Social Media Disorder Scale and the Bergen Social Media Addiction Scale.

IF 6.2 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Journal of Behavioral Addictions Pub Date : 2025-09-03 Print Date: 2025-09-30 DOI:10.1556/2006.2025.00073
Víctor Ciudad-Fernández, Loïs Fournier, Tamara Escrivá-Martínez, Rosa Baños, Alfredo Zarco-Alpuente, Joël Billieux
{"title":"Salience and tolerance are not indicators of problematic social media use: Evidence from the Social Media Disorder Scale and the Bergen Social Media Addiction Scale.","authors":"Víctor Ciudad-Fernández, Loïs Fournier, Tamara Escrivá-Martínez, Rosa Baños, Alfredo Zarco-Alpuente, Joël Billieux","doi":"10.1556/2006.2025.00073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>The components model of addiction outlines six criteria shared by all addictive disorders. This proposal has been widely applied to conceptualize behavioral addictions, including problematic social media use (PSMU). However, certain criteria can be defined as \"core\" (e.g., mood modification, relapse, withdrawal, conflict), reflecting problematic involvement, while others as \"peripheral\" (e.g., salience, tolerance), reflecting non-problematic involvement. We evaluated whether a two-factor model distinguishing between core and peripheral criteria provides a better fit than the unifactorial model in PSMU. Additionally, we examined whether core and peripheral criteria exhibit different patterns of association with psychological measures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 2,761 adolescents (M = 14.80 years, SD = 1.91 years) completed the Bergen Social Media Addiction Scale (BSMAS), the Social Media Disorder Scale (SMD), and measures of depression, anxiety, loneliness, life satisfaction, and self-esteem. Confirmatory factor analyses compared one-factor and two-factor models for the BSMAS and SMD. Associations were evaluated using structural equation models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A two-factor model that distinguished core (i.e., mood modification, relapse, withdrawal, conflict) and peripheral (i.e., salience, tolerance) criteria provided a better fit than the unifactorial model for both scales. Core criteria were positively associated with depression, anxiety, and loneliness, and negatively associated with life satisfaction and self-esteem. Opposite patterns were observed for peripheral criteria: they were negatively associated with depression, anxiety, and loneliness, and positively associated with life satisfaction and self-esteem.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest that the components model of addiction may not be valid for assessing PSMU, promoting overdiagnosis and pathologization.</p>","PeriodicalId":15049,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral Addictions","volume":" ","pages":"1380-1393"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12486260/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavioral Addictions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.2025.00073","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: The components model of addiction outlines six criteria shared by all addictive disorders. This proposal has been widely applied to conceptualize behavioral addictions, including problematic social media use (PSMU). However, certain criteria can be defined as "core" (e.g., mood modification, relapse, withdrawal, conflict), reflecting problematic involvement, while others as "peripheral" (e.g., salience, tolerance), reflecting non-problematic involvement. We evaluated whether a two-factor model distinguishing between core and peripheral criteria provides a better fit than the unifactorial model in PSMU. Additionally, we examined whether core and peripheral criteria exhibit different patterns of association with psychological measures.

Methods: A total of 2,761 adolescents (M = 14.80 years, SD = 1.91 years) completed the Bergen Social Media Addiction Scale (BSMAS), the Social Media Disorder Scale (SMD), and measures of depression, anxiety, loneliness, life satisfaction, and self-esteem. Confirmatory factor analyses compared one-factor and two-factor models for the BSMAS and SMD. Associations were evaluated using structural equation models.

Results: A two-factor model that distinguished core (i.e., mood modification, relapse, withdrawal, conflict) and peripheral (i.e., salience, tolerance) criteria provided a better fit than the unifactorial model for both scales. Core criteria were positively associated with depression, anxiety, and loneliness, and negatively associated with life satisfaction and self-esteem. Opposite patterns were observed for peripheral criteria: they were negatively associated with depression, anxiety, and loneliness, and positively associated with life satisfaction and self-esteem.

Discussion and conclusions: Our findings suggest that the components model of addiction may not be valid for assessing PSMU, promoting overdiagnosis and pathologization.

Abstract Image

突出和容忍并不是有问题的社交媒体使用的指标:来自社交媒体障碍量表和卑尔根社交媒体成瘾量表的证据。
背景和目的:成瘾的成分模型概述了所有成瘾障碍共有的六个标准。这一建议已被广泛应用于行为成瘾的概念化,包括有问题的社交媒体使用(PSMU)。然而,某些标准可以被定义为“核心”(如情绪改变、复发、戒断、冲突),反映出有问题的涉入,而另一些标准则被定义为“外围”(如突出性、耐受性),反映出无问题的涉入。我们评估了区分核心和外围标准的双因素模型是否比单因素模型在PSMU中提供更好的拟合。此外,我们研究了核心和外围标准是否与心理测量表现出不同的关联模式。方法:共2761名青少年(M = 14.80岁,SD = 1.91岁)完成了卑尔根社交媒体成瘾量表(BSMAS)、社交媒体障碍量表(SMD)以及抑郁、焦虑、孤独、生活满意度和自尊的测量。验证性因子分析比较了单因素模型和双因素模型对BSMAS和SMD的影响。使用结构方程模型评估关联。结果:区分核心(即情绪改变、复发、戒断、冲突)和外围(即显著性、耐受性)标准的双因素模型比单因素模型对两个量表的拟合更好。核心标准与抑郁、焦虑和孤独呈正相关,与生活满意度和自尊呈负相关。在外围标准中观察到相反的模式:它们与抑郁、焦虑和孤独负相关,与生活满意度和自尊正相关。讨论与结论:我们的研究结果表明,成瘾的成分模型可能无法有效评估PSMU,促进过度诊断和病理化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
91
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of Journal of Behavioral Addictions is to create a forum for the scientific information exchange with regard to behavioral addictions. The journal is a broad focused interdisciplinary one that publishes manuscripts on different approaches of non-substance addictions, research reports focusing on the addictive patterns of various behaviors, especially disorders of the impulsive-compulsive spectrum, and also publishes reviews in these topics. Coverage ranges from genetic and neurobiological research through psychological and clinical psychiatric approaches to epidemiological, sociological and anthropological aspects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信