Early childhood screen use and symptoms of problematic media use.

IF 6.2 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Journal of Behavioral Addictions Pub Date : 2025-09-02 Print Date: 2025-09-30 DOI:10.1556/2006.2025.00064
Caroline Fitzpatrick, Marie-Andrée Binet, Daniel Tornaim Spritzer, Gabriel A Tiraboschi, Sarah E Domoff, Gabrielle Garon-Carrier, Hermano Tavares
{"title":"Early childhood screen use and symptoms of problematic media use.","authors":"Caroline Fitzpatrick, Marie-Andrée Binet, Daniel Tornaim Spritzer, Gabriel A Tiraboschi, Sarah E Domoff, Gabrielle Garon-Carrier, Hermano Tavares","doi":"10.1556/2006.2025.00064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess associations between early childhood screen time trajectories and problematic media use scores by age 5.5.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The present study is based on a prospective, community-based convenience sample of 315 parents of preschoolers, from Canada studied at the ages of 3.5 (2020), 4.5 (2021), and 5.5 (2022) during the Covid-19 pandemic. Parent-reported screen use at the ages of 3.5, 4.5, and 5.5 was used to estimate preschooler screen use trajectories. Using latent growth modeling, we identified low (mean = 0.9 h/day, 23%), average (mean = 3.0 h/day, 56%), and high (mean = 6.38 h/day, 21%) screen time trajectories. Parents reported child problematic media using the Problematic Media Use Measure - Short Form (PMUM-SF).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A multiple regression, adjusted for child sex, effortful control and parent education and stress revealed that compared to children in the low screen time trajectory, children in the high screen time trajectory had higher problematic media use scores at age 5.5 (β = 0.378, p < 0.001). In addition, children in the average screen time trajectory scored higher than children in the low screen time trajectory (β = 0.229, p ≤ 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings suggest that higher screen use in early childhood is associated with an increased risk for the development of dysregulated media use, which can interfere with family functioning. As such, parents should be encouraged to follow screen time recommendations of ≤1 h/day for children between the ages of 2 and 5.</p>","PeriodicalId":15049,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral Addictions","volume":" ","pages":"1411-1418"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12486259/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavioral Addictions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.2025.00064","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess associations between early childhood screen time trajectories and problematic media use scores by age 5.5.

Methods: The present study is based on a prospective, community-based convenience sample of 315 parents of preschoolers, from Canada studied at the ages of 3.5 (2020), 4.5 (2021), and 5.5 (2022) during the Covid-19 pandemic. Parent-reported screen use at the ages of 3.5, 4.5, and 5.5 was used to estimate preschooler screen use trajectories. Using latent growth modeling, we identified low (mean = 0.9 h/day, 23%), average (mean = 3.0 h/day, 56%), and high (mean = 6.38 h/day, 21%) screen time trajectories. Parents reported child problematic media using the Problematic Media Use Measure - Short Form (PMUM-SF).

Results: A multiple regression, adjusted for child sex, effortful control and parent education and stress revealed that compared to children in the low screen time trajectory, children in the high screen time trajectory had higher problematic media use scores at age 5.5 (β = 0.378, p < 0.001). In addition, children in the average screen time trajectory scored higher than children in the low screen time trajectory (β = 0.229, p ≤ 0.001).

Conclusion: Our findings suggest that higher screen use in early childhood is associated with an increased risk for the development of dysregulated media use, which can interfere with family functioning. As such, parents should be encouraged to follow screen time recommendations of ≤1 h/day for children between the ages of 2 and 5.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

儿童早期屏幕使用和问题媒体使用的症状。
目的:评估儿童早期屏幕时间轨迹与5.5岁时问题媒体使用得分之间的关系。方法:本研究基于一项前瞻性、基于社区的便利样本,研究对象是来自加拿大的315名学龄前儿童父母,他们在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间分别为3.5岁(2020年)、4.5岁(2021年)和5.5岁(2022年)。父母在3.5岁、4.5岁和5.5岁时报告的屏幕使用情况被用来估计学龄前儿童屏幕使用轨迹。使用潜在增长模型,我们确定了低(平均= 0.9小时/天,23%),平均(平均= 3.0小时/天,56%)和高(平均= 6.38小时/天,21%)的屏幕时间轨迹。家长使用问题媒体使用测量-简短表格(PMUM-SF)报告儿童问题媒体。结果:经儿童性别、努力控制、父母教育和压力因素调整后的多元回归显示,与低屏幕时间轨迹的儿童相比,高屏幕时间轨迹的儿童在5.5岁时的问题媒体使用得分更高(β = 0.378, p < 0.001)。平均屏幕时间轨迹组儿童得分高于低屏幕时间轨迹组儿童(β = 0.229, p≤0.001)。结论:我们的研究结果表明,儿童早期使用屏幕的时间越长,媒体使用失调的风险越高,这可能会干扰家庭功能。因此,应鼓励家长遵循2至5岁儿童每天≤1小时的屏幕时间建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
91
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of Journal of Behavioral Addictions is to create a forum for the scientific information exchange with regard to behavioral addictions. The journal is a broad focused interdisciplinary one that publishes manuscripts on different approaches of non-substance addictions, research reports focusing on the addictive patterns of various behaviors, especially disorders of the impulsive-compulsive spectrum, and also publishes reviews in these topics. Coverage ranges from genetic and neurobiological research through psychological and clinical psychiatric approaches to epidemiological, sociological and anthropological aspects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信