The Importance of Matching Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Metrics to Diabetic Retinopathy Severity for Detecting Progression.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Shinji Kakihara, Kallista Zhuang, Mohamed AbdelSalam, Taffeta Chingning Yamaguchi, Amani A Fawzi
{"title":"The Importance of Matching Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Metrics to Diabetic Retinopathy Severity for Detecting Progression.","authors":"Shinji Kakihara, Kallista Zhuang, Mohamed AbdelSalam, Taffeta Chingning Yamaguchi, Amani A Fawzi","doi":"10.1167/iovs.66.11.49","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to determine which macular optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) metric best captures early progression of capillary non-perfusion across diabetic retinopathy (DR) severities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective, 1-year observational study, 208 patients with diabetes (320 eyes) underwent 3 × 3 mm macular OCTA at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months. Registered, averaged images yielded geometric perfusion deficits (GPDs), vessel density (VD), vessel length density (VLD) in the superficial and deep capillary plexuses (SCP and DCP), and foveal avascular zone area. Eyes were graded as non-referable or referable. Linear mixed models adjusted for age, sex, diabetes duration, hemoglobin A1c, and hypertension were conducted. Post hoc Dunnett's tests compared follow-ups with baseline within each severity group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 709 eye visits were analyzed by OCTA. Across the cohort, referable DR, longer diabetes duration, and hypertension were independently associated with higher GPD values. In referable eyes, GPD-DCP increased at 6 months (P = 0.036) and 1 year (P = 0.016), whereas no other OCTA metric changed significantly at 6 months. In non-referable eyes, the only significant change was a decrease in VD-SCP at 1 year (P = 0.004).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Microvascular progression follows distinct, layer-specific patterns. In non-referable DR, capillary ischemia progresses more slowly and is more prominent in the SCP. In referable DR, GPD-DCP detected the earliest signs of microvascular progression and may serve as a promising biomarker, preceding vessel-based metrics. These findings suggest that the most informative OCTA metric should be tailored not only to the study question or timeline, but also to DR severity.</p>","PeriodicalId":14620,"journal":{"name":"Investigative ophthalmology & visual science","volume":"66 11","pages":"49"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12372949/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Investigative ophthalmology & visual science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.66.11.49","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine which macular optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) metric best captures early progression of capillary non-perfusion across diabetic retinopathy (DR) severities.

Methods: In this prospective, 1-year observational study, 208 patients with diabetes (320 eyes) underwent 3 × 3 mm macular OCTA at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months. Registered, averaged images yielded geometric perfusion deficits (GPDs), vessel density (VD), vessel length density (VLD) in the superficial and deep capillary plexuses (SCP and DCP), and foveal avascular zone area. Eyes were graded as non-referable or referable. Linear mixed models adjusted for age, sex, diabetes duration, hemoglobin A1c, and hypertension were conducted. Post hoc Dunnett's tests compared follow-ups with baseline within each severity group.

Results: A total of 709 eye visits were analyzed by OCTA. Across the cohort, referable DR, longer diabetes duration, and hypertension were independently associated with higher GPD values. In referable eyes, GPD-DCP increased at 6 months (P = 0.036) and 1 year (P = 0.016), whereas no other OCTA metric changed significantly at 6 months. In non-referable eyes, the only significant change was a decrease in VD-SCP at 1 year (P = 0.004).

Conclusions: Microvascular progression follows distinct, layer-specific patterns. In non-referable DR, capillary ischemia progresses more slowly and is more prominent in the SCP. In referable DR, GPD-DCP detected the earliest signs of microvascular progression and may serve as a promising biomarker, preceding vessel-based metrics. These findings suggest that the most informative OCTA metric should be tailored not only to the study question or timeline, but also to DR severity.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

匹配光学相干断层扫描血管造影指标对糖尿病视网膜病变严重程度检测进展的重要性。
目的:本研究的目的是确定哪种黄斑光学相干断层扫描血管造影(OCTA)指标最能捕捉糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)严重程度毛细血管非灌注的早期进展。方法:在这项为期1年的前瞻性观察研究中,208例糖尿病患者(320只眼)在基线、6个月和12个月接受了3 × 3 mm黄斑OCTA。注册后的平均图像显示几何灌注缺陷(GPDs)、浅、深毛细血管丛(SCP和DCP)的血管密度(VD)、血管长度密度(VLD)以及中央凹无血管区面积。眼睛被分为不可参考和可参考。进行了年龄、性别、糖尿病病程、糖化血红蛋白和高血压校正的线性混合模型。事后邓尼特测试将每个严重程度组的随访与基线进行比较。结果:对709例眼科就诊进行了OCTA分析。在整个队列中,可参考的DR、较长的糖尿病病程和高血压与较高的GPD值独立相关。在参考眼,GPD-DCP在6个月(P = 0.036)和1年(P = 0.016)时增加,而其他OCTA指标在6个月时没有显著变化。在非参考眼中,唯一显著变化是1年后VD-SCP下降(P = 0.004)。结论:微血管进展遵循明显的层特异性模式。在非参考DR中,毛细血管缺血进展更慢,在SCP中更突出。在可参考的DR中,GPD-DCP检测到微血管进展的最早迹象,可能作为一种有希望的生物标志物,先于基于血管的指标。这些发现表明,最具信息量的OCTA指标不仅应该针对研究问题或时间线,而且应该针对DR的严重程度进行定制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
339
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science (IOVS), published as ready online, is a peer-reviewed academic journal of the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO). IOVS features original research, mostly pertaining to clinical and laboratory ophthalmology and vision research in general.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信