Margot P Moody, Natasha M Loi, Adam J Rock, Kim J Usher, Kylie Rice
{"title":"Mental health service preferences in rural Australia: the importance of culture and connection.","authors":"Margot P Moody, Natasha M Loi, Adam J Rock, Kim J Usher, Kylie Rice","doi":"10.1080/00049530.2025.2544924","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>There is a lack of adequate mental health services available in rural and remote Australia, with rural Australians experiencing poorer mental health outcomes than those in urban areas. Service access needs to improve, and the current study aimed to address this by exploring the acceptability of services, including telehealth, among rural Australians.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A convergent mixed-method online survey was used to examine mental health service and clinician preferences via a series of open-ended and scaled questions. A total of 294 rural and regional Australians participated in the study, and textual responses were analysed using reflexive content analysis, with a repeated measures analysis of variance utilised to further examine telehealth acceptability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results indicated a preference for in-person support that was accessible and available, with clinicians who were qualified and clinically competent. The importance of cultural competence was also highlighted, with responses indicating a need for clinicians with both rural and local knowledge, who also fostered connection and trust with their clients. Likewise, participants demonstrated an increasing acceptability of telehealth, provided the clinician was rurally based.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results indicate a need for mental health services in rural Australia to be acceptable and relevant in order to best meet the needs of this population. Implications for future service delivery in rural areas, including recommendations for further research, are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":8871,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Psychology","volume":"77 1","pages":"2544924"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12364104/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00049530.2025.2544924","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: There is a lack of adequate mental health services available in rural and remote Australia, with rural Australians experiencing poorer mental health outcomes than those in urban areas. Service access needs to improve, and the current study aimed to address this by exploring the acceptability of services, including telehealth, among rural Australians.
Method: A convergent mixed-method online survey was used to examine mental health service and clinician preferences via a series of open-ended and scaled questions. A total of 294 rural and regional Australians participated in the study, and textual responses were analysed using reflexive content analysis, with a repeated measures analysis of variance utilised to further examine telehealth acceptability.
Results: Results indicated a preference for in-person support that was accessible and available, with clinicians who were qualified and clinically competent. The importance of cultural competence was also highlighted, with responses indicating a need for clinicians with both rural and local knowledge, who also fostered connection and trust with their clients. Likewise, participants demonstrated an increasing acceptability of telehealth, provided the clinician was rurally based.
Conclusions: The results indicate a need for mental health services in rural Australia to be acceptable and relevant in order to best meet the needs of this population. Implications for future service delivery in rural areas, including recommendations for further research, are discussed.
期刊介绍:
Australian Journal of Psychology is the premier scientific journal of the Australian Psychological Society. It covers the entire spectrum of psychological research and receives articles on all topics within the broad scope of the discipline. The journal publishes high quality peer-reviewed articles with reviewers and associate editors providing detailed assistance to authors to reach publication. The journal publishes reports of experimental and survey studies, including reports of qualitative investigations, on pure and applied topics in the field of psychology. Articles on clinical psychology or on the professional concerns of applied psychology should be submitted to our sister journals, Australian Psychologist or Clinical Psychologist. The journal publishes occasional reviews of specific topics, theoretical pieces and commentaries on methodological issues. There are also solicited book reviews and comments Annual special issues devoted to a single topic, and guest edited by a specialist editor, are published. The journal regards itself as international in vision and will accept submissions from psychologists in all countries.