Exploring the association between inhibitory control and mathematical performance in early childhood: A systematic review.

IF 1.1 4区 心理学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Andrea Casanova, Cristina Rodríguez, Roberto A Ferreira, Isabeau Miranda
{"title":"Exploring the association between inhibitory control and mathematical performance in early childhood: A systematic review.","authors":"Andrea Casanova, Cristina Rodríguez, Roberto A Ferreira, Isabeau Miranda","doi":"10.1080/21622965.2025.2552198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the past decade, studies on the association between inhibitory control (IC) and mathematical skills in early childhood have grown significantly. However, no subsequent review has been conducted since a decade ago. This systematic review synthesizes research up to 2025 from eight countries, primarily the United States, involving 10,061 children aged 3.5 to 7 years. The review highlights significant methodological diversity in the tools used to assess IC-such as peg-tapping, Go/No-Go, and Stroop tasks-and mathematical abilities, ranging from object counting to standardized tests like TEMA-3 and Woodcock-Johnson. Findings indicate a generally significant yet variable relationship between IC and early mathematical skills. Most studies suggest a moderate relationship, with some showing weaker or stronger associations. Notably, Attentional IC, the ability to suppress attention to distracting stimuli, shows a slightly stronger and more consistent association with mathematical performance than response inhibition, understood as the ability to suppress dominant motor responses. Methodological challenges include variations in IC tasks, participant age ranges, and potential publication bias. Future research should standardize methodologies, utilize longitudinal designs, and be conducted in less developed countries to provide deeper insights into how IC impacts mathematical development. These findings highlight the need for further research to inform targeted educational strategies and interventions, especially in diverse socioeconomic and developmental contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":8047,"journal":{"name":"Applied Neuropsychology: Child","volume":" ","pages":"1-23"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Neuropsychology: Child","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21622965.2025.2552198","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the past decade, studies on the association between inhibitory control (IC) and mathematical skills in early childhood have grown significantly. However, no subsequent review has been conducted since a decade ago. This systematic review synthesizes research up to 2025 from eight countries, primarily the United States, involving 10,061 children aged 3.5 to 7 years. The review highlights significant methodological diversity in the tools used to assess IC-such as peg-tapping, Go/No-Go, and Stroop tasks-and mathematical abilities, ranging from object counting to standardized tests like TEMA-3 and Woodcock-Johnson. Findings indicate a generally significant yet variable relationship between IC and early mathematical skills. Most studies suggest a moderate relationship, with some showing weaker or stronger associations. Notably, Attentional IC, the ability to suppress attention to distracting stimuli, shows a slightly stronger and more consistent association with mathematical performance than response inhibition, understood as the ability to suppress dominant motor responses. Methodological challenges include variations in IC tasks, participant age ranges, and potential publication bias. Future research should standardize methodologies, utilize longitudinal designs, and be conducted in less developed countries to provide deeper insights into how IC impacts mathematical development. These findings highlight the need for further research to inform targeted educational strategies and interventions, especially in diverse socioeconomic and developmental contexts.

探索抑制控制与幼儿数学表现之间的关系:一项系统综述。
在过去的十年中,关于抑制控制(IC)与幼儿数学技能之间关系的研究有了显著的发展。然而,自十年前以来,没有进行过后续审查。该系统综述综合了截至2025年来自8个国家(主要是美国)的研究,涉及10,061名年龄在3.5至7岁之间的儿童。这篇综述强调了用于评估智力的工具在方法上的显著多样性,比如敲钉子、Go/ o-Go和Stroop任务,以及从物体计数到TEMA-3和Woodcock-Johnson等标准化测试的数学能力。研究结果表明,智力测验与早期数学技能之间存在普遍显著但可变的关系。大多数研究表明两者之间存在中等程度的关系,有些研究显示两者之间的联系或强或弱。值得注意的是,注意力集成,即抑制对分散注意力的刺激的注意力的能力,与反应抑制相比,与数学表现的联系更强,更一致,反应抑制被理解为抑制主导运动反应的能力。方法上的挑战包括IC任务的变化、参与者的年龄范围和潜在的发表偏倚。未来的研究应该标准化方法,利用纵向设计,并在欠发达国家进行,以提供对集成电路如何影响数学发展的更深入的见解。这些发现强调需要进一步研究,为有针对性的教育战略和干预提供信息,特别是在不同的社会经济和发展背景下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Neuropsychology: Child
Applied Neuropsychology: Child CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-PSYCHOLOGY
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: Applied Neuropsychology: Child publishes clinical neuropsychological articles concerning assessment, brain functioning and neuroimaging, neuropsychological treatment, and rehabilitation in children. Full-length articles and brief communications are included. Case studies of child patients carefully assessing the nature, course, or treatment of clinical neuropsychological dysfunctions in the context of scientific literature, are suitable. Review manuscripts addressing critical issues are encouraged. Preference is given to papers of clinical relevance to others in the field. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor-in-Chief, and, if found suitable for further considerations are peer reviewed by independent, anonymous expert referees. All peer review is single-blind and submission is online via ScholarOne Manuscripts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信