Diet, genetic factors, and the risk of gastroesophageal reflux disease, Barrett's esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma

IF 5.4 1区 农林科学 Q1 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Food & Function Pub Date : 2025-08-09 DOI:10.1039/D5FO00369E
Tongyu Zhang, Meiyou Lu, Zihan Li, Jianan Zheng, Jing Cao, Yichan Zhou, Weibing Wu, Liang Chen, Ting Wang and Jing Xu
{"title":"Diet, genetic factors, and the risk of gastroesophageal reflux disease, Barrett's esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma","authors":"Tongyu Zhang, Meiyou Lu, Zihan Li, Jianan Zheng, Jing Cao, Yichan Zhou, Weibing Wu, Liang Chen, Ting Wang and Jing Xu","doi":"10.1039/D5FO00369E","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >\r\n <em>Introduction</em>: Diet has been recognized as the most pivotal modifiable lifestyle factor in the development of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD), Barrett's Esophagus (BE) and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma (EA). However, the associations between dietary ingredients, patterns, and diet–gene interactions with the risk of GERD, BE and EA remain unclear. <em>Methods</em>: The prospective cohort study included 502 412 participants from the UK Biobank. Dietary ingredients, patterns, and the associations with the incidence of GERD, BE and EA were investigated using Cox proportional hazard models. Additionally, we calculated a healthy dietary score based on eight primary dietary factors. Furthermore, polygenic risk scores were developed to explore potential diet–gene interactions. <em>Results</em>: Over an average follow-up of 12.5 years, we identified 29 564 incident cases of GERD, 4081 cases of BE and 539 cases of EA. Frequent tea intake was consistently associated with an increased risk of GERD (HR = 1.04, CI: 1.03, 1.05), BE (HR = 1.08, CI: 1.06, 1.11) and EA (HR = 1.07, CI: 1.01, 1.14), while higher dietary fiber consumption was inversely associated with the risks (HR = 0.92 for GERD, CI: 0.90, 0.94; HR = 0.78 for BE, CI: 0.73, 0.84; HR = 0.81 for EA, CI: 0.68, 0.97). In the dietary pattern analysis, the prudent pattern was linked to a lower risk of GERD, BE and EA (HR = 0.95 for GERD, CI: 0.91, 0.98; HR = 0.84 for BE, CI: 0.76, 0.92; HR = 0.70 for EA, CI: 0.53, 0.93). Significant additive and multiplicative interactions were observed between diet and genetic risk for BE (RERI = 0.32, CI: 0.11, 0.52; <em>P</em><small><sub>multiplicative interaction</sub></small> = 0.039) and EA (RERI = 0.84, CI: 0.34, 1.33; <em>P</em><small><sub>multiplicative interaction</sub></small> = 0.038). <em>Discussion</em>: Our study highlights the role of dietary exposure in the etiology of GERD, BE and EA. Healthy dietary interventions may be beneficial, especially for populations with high genetic risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":77,"journal":{"name":"Food & Function","volume":" 18","pages":" 7082-7093"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food & Function","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/fo/d5fo00369e","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Diet has been recognized as the most pivotal modifiable lifestyle factor in the development of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD), Barrett's Esophagus (BE) and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma (EA). However, the associations between dietary ingredients, patterns, and diet–gene interactions with the risk of GERD, BE and EA remain unclear. Methods: The prospective cohort study included 502 412 participants from the UK Biobank. Dietary ingredients, patterns, and the associations with the incidence of GERD, BE and EA were investigated using Cox proportional hazard models. Additionally, we calculated a healthy dietary score based on eight primary dietary factors. Furthermore, polygenic risk scores were developed to explore potential diet–gene interactions. Results: Over an average follow-up of 12.5 years, we identified 29 564 incident cases of GERD, 4081 cases of BE and 539 cases of EA. Frequent tea intake was consistently associated with an increased risk of GERD (HR = 1.04, CI: 1.03, 1.05), BE (HR = 1.08, CI: 1.06, 1.11) and EA (HR = 1.07, CI: 1.01, 1.14), while higher dietary fiber consumption was inversely associated with the risks (HR = 0.92 for GERD, CI: 0.90, 0.94; HR = 0.78 for BE, CI: 0.73, 0.84; HR = 0.81 for EA, CI: 0.68, 0.97). In the dietary pattern analysis, the prudent pattern was linked to a lower risk of GERD, BE and EA (HR = 0.95 for GERD, CI: 0.91, 0.98; HR = 0.84 for BE, CI: 0.76, 0.92; HR = 0.70 for EA, CI: 0.53, 0.93). Significant additive and multiplicative interactions were observed between diet and genetic risk for BE (RERI = 0.32, CI: 0.11, 0.52; Pmultiplicative interaction = 0.039) and EA (RERI = 0.84, CI: 0.34, 1.33; Pmultiplicative interaction = 0.038). Discussion: Our study highlights the role of dietary exposure in the etiology of GERD, BE and EA. Healthy dietary interventions may be beneficial, especially for populations with high genetic risk.

Abstract Image

饮食、遗传因素与胃食管反流病、巴雷特食管和食管腺癌的风险。
饮食已被认为是胃食管反流病(GERD)、巴雷特食管(BE)和食管腺癌(EA)发展中最关键的可改变的生活方式因素。然而,饮食成分、饮食模式和饮食-基因相互作用与胃食管反流、BE和EA风险之间的关系尚不清楚。方法:前瞻性队列研究包括来自UK Biobank的502412名参与者。采用Cox比例风险模型调查饮食成分、饮食模式及其与胃食管反流、BE和EA发病率的关系。此外,我们根据八个主要饮食因素计算了健康饮食评分。此外,还开发了多基因风险评分来探索潜在的饮食-基因相互作用。结果:在一个平均12.5年的随访中,我们确定了29 564起事件GERD, EA的4081例和539例。频繁的茶摄入量一直与GERD的风险增加(CI HR = 1.04: 1.03, 1.05),是(CI HR = 1.08: 1.06, 1.11)和EA (CI HR = 1.07: 1.01, 1.14),而高膳食纤维消费呈负相关的风险(GERD HR = 0.92, CI: 0.90, 0.94; HR = 0.78, CI: 0.73, 0.84;对EA HR = 0.81, CI: 0.68, 0.97)。在饮食模式分析中,谨慎的饮食模式与较低的GERD、BE和EA风险相关(GERD的HR = 0.95, CI: 0.91, 0.98; BE的HR = 0.84, CI: 0.76, 0.92; EA的HR = 0.70, CI: 0.53, 0.93)。饮食与BE (rei = 0.32, CI: 0.11, 0.52;乘法交互作用= 0.039)和EA (rei = 0.84, CI: 0.34, 1.33;乘法交互作用= 0.038)的遗传风险存在显著的加性和乘法交互作用。讨论:我们的研究强调了饮食暴露在胃食管反流、BE和EA病因学中的作用。健康的饮食干预可能是有益的,特别是对高遗传风险人群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Food & Function
Food & Function BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY-FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
6.60%
发文量
957
审稿时长
1.8 months
期刊介绍: Food & Function provides a unique venue for physicists, chemists, biochemists, nutritionists and other food scientists to publish work at the interface of the chemistry, physics and biology of food. The journal focuses on food and the functions of food in relation to health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信