Exploring the cost–carbon trade-off in using a mixed fleet of hydrogen trucks and diesel trucks

IF 2.5 4区 管理学 Q2 MANAGEMENT
Siqiang Guo, Erhan Kutanoglu, Shadi Goodarzi, Manjeet Singh
{"title":"Exploring the cost–carbon trade-off in using a mixed fleet of hydrogen trucks and diesel trucks","authors":"Siqiang Guo,&nbsp;Erhan Kutanoglu,&nbsp;Shadi Goodarzi,&nbsp;Manjeet Singh","doi":"10.1111/deci.12659","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Hydrogen trucks (HTs) offer promising potential for decarbonizing the transportation sector. Based on current technologies, they have significant advantages over electric trucks (ETs) in terms of range, refueling time, and performance in cold conditions. However, HTs are costly, and there are insufficient hydrogen refueling stations (HRSs). Gradually integrating HTs into the existing diesel truck (DT) fleet is a practical approach for many freight logistics companies. In this article, we formulate a mathematical model to route a mixed fleet of HTs and DTs, and we propose an algorithm called the curve descent search (CDS) to generate the Pareto set based on cost and carbon emissions. We find that CDS can generate better Pareto sets compared to existing algorithms in the literature. We use CDS to comprehensively explore the cost–carbon trade-off in using a mixed fleet. This question differentiates our study from previous research and is motivated by discussions with one of the largest third-party logistics companies in North America. Detailed experiments reveal important managerial insights, such as: (1) Achieving a significant reduction in carbon emissions (e.g., a 30% reduction compared to the current diesel fleet) does not need a very dense refueling infrastructure; (2) The cost–carbon trade-off for mixed fleets is relatively insensitive to variations in customer density and demand, suggesting that HTs can be applicable across a wide range of scenarios (including different sectors or regions); and (3) Although ETs are cheaper to use compared to HTs, their shorter range limits their competitiveness in terms of decarbonization efficiency and customer service.</p>","PeriodicalId":48256,"journal":{"name":"DECISION SCIENCES","volume":"56 4","pages":"341-360"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DECISION SCIENCES","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/deci.12659","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hydrogen trucks (HTs) offer promising potential for decarbonizing the transportation sector. Based on current technologies, they have significant advantages over electric trucks (ETs) in terms of range, refueling time, and performance in cold conditions. However, HTs are costly, and there are insufficient hydrogen refueling stations (HRSs). Gradually integrating HTs into the existing diesel truck (DT) fleet is a practical approach for many freight logistics companies. In this article, we formulate a mathematical model to route a mixed fleet of HTs and DTs, and we propose an algorithm called the curve descent search (CDS) to generate the Pareto set based on cost and carbon emissions. We find that CDS can generate better Pareto sets compared to existing algorithms in the literature. We use CDS to comprehensively explore the cost–carbon trade-off in using a mixed fleet. This question differentiates our study from previous research and is motivated by discussions with one of the largest third-party logistics companies in North America. Detailed experiments reveal important managerial insights, such as: (1) Achieving a significant reduction in carbon emissions (e.g., a 30% reduction compared to the current diesel fleet) does not need a very dense refueling infrastructure; (2) The cost–carbon trade-off for mixed fleets is relatively insensitive to variations in customer density and demand, suggesting that HTs can be applicable across a wide range of scenarios (including different sectors or regions); and (3) Although ETs are cheaper to use compared to HTs, their shorter range limits their competitiveness in terms of decarbonization efficiency and customer service.

探索使用氢燃料卡车和柴油卡车混合车队的成本-碳权衡
氢燃料卡车(ht)为运输行业脱碳提供了巨大的潜力。基于目前的技术,它们在行驶里程、加油时间和寒冷条件下的性能方面都比电动卡车(ETs)有显著优势。然而,高温燃料电池价格昂贵,而且氢燃料补给站(HRSs)不足。对于许多货运物流公司来说,逐步将ht整合到现有的柴油卡车(DT)车队中是一种实用的方法。在这篇文章中,我们建立了一个数学模型来规划高通量交通工具和低通量交通工具的混合路线,并提出了一种称为曲线下降搜索(CDS)的算法来生成基于成本和碳排放的帕累托集。我们发现,与文献中的现有算法相比,CDS可以生成更好的帕累托集。我们使用CDS来全面探讨使用混合车队的成本-碳权衡。这个问题使我们的研究与之前的研究有所不同,其动机是与北美最大的第三方物流公司之一的讨论。详细的实验揭示了重要的管理见解,例如:(1)实现碳排放的显著减少(例如,与目前的柴油车队相比减少30%)不需要非常密集的加油基础设施;(2)混合机队的成本-碳权衡对客户密度和需求的变化相对不敏感,这表明混合机队可以适用于广泛的场景(包括不同的部门或地区);(3)虽然碳排放系统的使用成本较低,但其较短的航程限制了其在脱碳效率和客户服务方面的竞争力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
DECISION SCIENCES
DECISION SCIENCES MANAGEMENT-
CiteScore
12.40
自引率
1.80%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Decision Sciences, a premier journal of the Decision Sciences Institute, publishes scholarly research about decision making within the boundaries of an organization, as well as decisions involving inter-firm coordination. The journal promotes research advancing decision making at the interfaces of business functions and organizational boundaries. The journal also seeks articles extending established lines of work assuming the results of the research have the potential to substantially impact either decision making theory or industry practice. Ground-breaking research articles that enhance managerial understanding of decision making processes and stimulate further research in multi-disciplinary domains are particularly encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信