Enforced Transnationalism From an Ethics of Care Perspective: Barriers to Living ‘Care-Filled Lives’ and Resistance Tactics Among ‘Forced’ Transnational Families in the UK

IF 2.6 2区 社会学 Q1 DEMOGRAPHY
Rosa Mas Giralt, Ruth Evans
{"title":"Enforced Transnationalism From an Ethics of Care Perspective: Barriers to Living ‘Care-Filled Lives’ and Resistance Tactics Among ‘Forced’ Transnational Families in the UK","authors":"Rosa Mas Giralt,&nbsp;Ruth Evans","doi":"10.1002/psp.70103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Heavily restricted humanitarian protection schemes, protracted waiting periods, and immobility regimes are increasingly disrupting familyhood and intra-/intergenerational caregiving practices for many forced migrants and their extended families. This paper draws from the experiences of 16 displaced families of diverse ethnicities living in the UK with higher care needs related to disability, chronic illness and/or mental health, which have hitherto been overlooked. Integrating feminist ethics of care with the notion of ‘enforced transnationalism’, the analysis shows how displaced families are subjected to a <i>continuum</i> of migration, welfare, and social care policies over time which result in processes of family ‘nuclearization’ and immobility. Barriers to family visits and reunification compound limitations on welfare and social care support when families seek to fulfil transnational caring obligations. This increases the pressures on the middle and younger generations providing informal care and negatively affects families' relational wellbeing. Despite this, transnational families deploy resistance tactics through maintaining and re-building intra- and intergenerational caring relationships and values of family solidarity to live ‘care-filled lives’ in the places where they have sought sanctuary. The paper significantly deepens the theoretical and empirical scope of the concept of ‘enforced transnationalism’, bringing relational selves and care front and centre in studies of forced migration and transnational familyhood.</p>","PeriodicalId":48067,"journal":{"name":"Population Space and Place","volume":"31 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/psp.70103","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Population Space and Place","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/psp.70103","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Heavily restricted humanitarian protection schemes, protracted waiting periods, and immobility regimes are increasingly disrupting familyhood and intra-/intergenerational caregiving practices for many forced migrants and their extended families. This paper draws from the experiences of 16 displaced families of diverse ethnicities living in the UK with higher care needs related to disability, chronic illness and/or mental health, which have hitherto been overlooked. Integrating feminist ethics of care with the notion of ‘enforced transnationalism’, the analysis shows how displaced families are subjected to a continuum of migration, welfare, and social care policies over time which result in processes of family ‘nuclearization’ and immobility. Barriers to family visits and reunification compound limitations on welfare and social care support when families seek to fulfil transnational caring obligations. This increases the pressures on the middle and younger generations providing informal care and negatively affects families' relational wellbeing. Despite this, transnational families deploy resistance tactics through maintaining and re-building intra- and intergenerational caring relationships and values of family solidarity to live ‘care-filled lives’ in the places where they have sought sanctuary. The paper significantly deepens the theoretical and empirical scope of the concept of ‘enforced transnationalism’, bringing relational selves and care front and centre in studies of forced migration and transnational familyhood.

从关怀伦理的角度看强迫跨国主义:英国“强迫”跨国家庭中“充满关怀的生活”的障碍和抵抗策略
严格限制的人道主义保护计划、漫长的等待期和不流动制度日益破坏了许多被迫移徙者及其大家庭的家庭关系和代际/代内照料做法。本文借鉴了居住在英国的16个不同种族的流离失所家庭的经验,这些家庭在残疾、慢性疾病和/或心理健康方面有更高的护理需求,这些需求迄今为止一直被忽视。该分析将女权主义关怀伦理与“强制跨国主义”的概念相结合,显示了流离失所的家庭如何随着时间的推移而受到移民、福利和社会关怀政策的连续影响,从而导致家庭“核化”和不流动的过程。当家庭寻求履行跨国照顾义务时,家庭访问和团聚方面的障碍加剧了福利和社会照顾支助方面的限制。这增加了提供非正式照顾的中青年一代的压力,并对家庭关系的健康产生负面影响。尽管如此,跨国家庭通过维持和重建代内和代际关怀关系和家庭团结的价值观来采取抵抗策略,在他们寻求庇护的地方过着“充满关怀的生活”。本文显著深化了“强迫跨国主义”概念的理论和实证范围,将关系自我和关怀置于强迫移民和跨国家庭研究的前沿和中心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
87
期刊介绍: Population, Space and Place aims to be the leading English-language research journal in the field of geographical population studies. It intends to: - Inform population researchers of the best theoretical and empirical research on topics related to population, space and place - Promote and further enhance the international standing of population research through the exchange of views on what constitutes best research practice - Facilitate debate on issues of policy relevance and encourage the widest possible discussion and dissemination of the applications of research on populations - Review and evaluate the significance of recent research findings and provide an international platform where researchers can discuss the future course of population research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信