First-line benmelstobart plus anlotinib versus sunitinib in advanced renal cell carcinoma (ETER100): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial

Aiping Zhou, Pengfei Shen, Juan Li, Wang Qu, Zengjun Wang, Xiubao Ren, Yuan Li, Shusuan Jiang, Gang Li, Yu Zeng, Weijun Qin, Jin Wu, Peng Chen, Fangjian Zhou, Hongqian Guo, Zhigang Ji, Yongquan Wang, Zhisong He, Jitao Wu, Benkang Shi, Xinan Sheng
{"title":"First-line benmelstobart plus anlotinib versus sunitinib in advanced renal cell carcinoma (ETER100): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial","authors":"Aiping Zhou, Pengfei Shen, Juan Li, Wang Qu, Zengjun Wang, Xiubao Ren, Yuan Li, Shusuan Jiang, Gang Li, Yu Zeng, Weijun Qin, Jin Wu, Peng Chen, Fangjian Zhou, Hongqian Guo, Zhigang Ji, Yongquan Wang, Zhisong He, Jitao Wu, Benkang Shi, Xinan Sheng","doi":"10.1016/s1470-2045(25)00343-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Background</h3>The underexplored potential of PD-L1 blockade in advanced renal cell carcinoma highlights an urgent need for novel agents. This trial aimed to compare benmelstobart (a novel PD-L1 inhibitor) plus anlotinib with sunitinib as first-line treatment for advanced renal cell carcinoma.<h3>Methods</h3>ETER100 was a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial conducted at 37 medical sites in China. We included patients aged 18–80 years, who had previously untreated, advanced, clear-cell renal cell carcinoma, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. We randomly assigned (1:1) patients to receive either benmelstobart (intravenous, 1200 mg, once every 3 weeks) plus anlotinib (oral, 12 mg, once daily for the first 2 weeks of a 3-week cycle) or sunitinib (oral, 50 mg, once daily for the first 4 weeks of a 6-week cycle) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, investigator's decision, or patient withdrawal. Randomisation was done centrally with stratified block randomisation (block size 4) and stratified by International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium risk. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival as assessed by blinded independent central review according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours version 1.1 in the full analysis set (ie, randomly assigned patients who received at least one dose of study drug without the violation of key inclusion criteria) and per-protocol set (ie, randomly assigned patients who received at least one cycle of protocol treatment without major protocol violations and had at least one efficacy assessment). In this Article, we report the results of a prespecified interim analysis. This ongoing study, closed to recruitment, is registered with <span><span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg aria-label=\"Opens in new window\" focusable=\"false\" height=\"20\" viewbox=\"0 0 8 8\"><path d=\"M1.12949 2.1072V1H7V6.85795H5.89111V2.90281L0.784057 8L0 7.21635L5.11902 2.1072H1.12949Z\"></path></svg></span>, <span><span>NCT04523272</span><svg aria-label=\"Opens in new window\" focusable=\"false\" height=\"20\" viewbox=\"0 0 8 8\"><path d=\"M1.12949 2.1072V1H7V6.85795H5.89111V2.90281L0.784057 8L0 7.21635L5.11902 2.1072H1.12949Z\"></path></svg></span>.<h3>Findings</h3>Between Aug 25, 2020, and Feb 6, 2023, we assessed 687 patients for eligibility, 531 (77%) of whom were randomly assigned to receive either benmelstobart plus anlotinib (266 [50%] patients) or sunitinib (265 [50%] patients). 527 (99%) patients were included in the full analysis set (263 [50%] patients who received benmelstobart plus anlotinib and 264 [50%] who received sunitinib). All patients were Chinese (400 [76%] men and 127 [24%] women), with a median age of 60 years (IQR 54–67). As of the cutoff date (Jan 31, 2024), the median follow-up was 22·8 months (IQR 15·2–29·7). In the full analysis set, median progression-free survival was significantly longer with benmelstobart plus anlotinib than with sunitinib (19·0 months [95% CI 15·3–22·8] <em>vs</em> 9·8 months [8·4–12·4]; hazard ratio [HR] 0·53 [95% CI 0·42–0·67]; p&lt;0·0001). In the per-protocol set, median progression-free survival was 19·0 months (16·5–22·8) in the benmelstobart–anlotinib group versus 11·0 months (8·5–13·6) in the sunitinib group (HR 0·55 [0·43–0·70]; p&lt;0·0001). The most common grade 3 or worse treatment-related adverse event was hypertension (occurring in 91 [34%] of 264 patients in the benmelstobart–anlotinib group <em>vs</em> 55 [21%] of 264 in the sunitinib group). Serious treatment-related adverse events occurred in 63 (24%) patients in the benmelstobart–anlotinib group and in 42 (16%) patients in the sunitinib group. In the benmelstobart–anlotinib group, three (1%) deaths occurred due to treatment-related adverse events (one each with cardiac-respiratory arrest, unknown reason, and renal failure) and no deaths occurred in the sunitinib group.<h3>Interpretation</h3>Benmelstobart plus anlotinib improved progression-free survival compared with sunitinib among patients with previously untreated, advanced clear-cell renal cell carcinoma. These findings suggest the potential of benmelstobart plus anlotinib as a treatment option for this population.<h3>Funding</h3>Chia Tai Tianqing Pharmaceutical Group and CSCO Clinical Oncology Research Foundation.<h3>Translation</h3>For the Chinese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.","PeriodicalId":22865,"journal":{"name":"The Lancet Oncology","volume":"162 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Lancet Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(25)00343-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The underexplored potential of PD-L1 blockade in advanced renal cell carcinoma highlights an urgent need for novel agents. This trial aimed to compare benmelstobart (a novel PD-L1 inhibitor) plus anlotinib with sunitinib as first-line treatment for advanced renal cell carcinoma.

Methods

ETER100 was a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial conducted at 37 medical sites in China. We included patients aged 18–80 years, who had previously untreated, advanced, clear-cell renal cell carcinoma, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. We randomly assigned (1:1) patients to receive either benmelstobart (intravenous, 1200 mg, once every 3 weeks) plus anlotinib (oral, 12 mg, once daily for the first 2 weeks of a 3-week cycle) or sunitinib (oral, 50 mg, once daily for the first 4 weeks of a 6-week cycle) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, investigator's decision, or patient withdrawal. Randomisation was done centrally with stratified block randomisation (block size 4) and stratified by International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium risk. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival as assessed by blinded independent central review according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours version 1.1 in the full analysis set (ie, randomly assigned patients who received at least one dose of study drug without the violation of key inclusion criteria) and per-protocol set (ie, randomly assigned patients who received at least one cycle of protocol treatment without major protocol violations and had at least one efficacy assessment). In this Article, we report the results of a prespecified interim analysis. This ongoing study, closed to recruitment, is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04523272.

Findings

Between Aug 25, 2020, and Feb 6, 2023, we assessed 687 patients for eligibility, 531 (77%) of whom were randomly assigned to receive either benmelstobart plus anlotinib (266 [50%] patients) or sunitinib (265 [50%] patients). 527 (99%) patients were included in the full analysis set (263 [50%] patients who received benmelstobart plus anlotinib and 264 [50%] who received sunitinib). All patients were Chinese (400 [76%] men and 127 [24%] women), with a median age of 60 years (IQR 54–67). As of the cutoff date (Jan 31, 2024), the median follow-up was 22·8 months (IQR 15·2–29·7). In the full analysis set, median progression-free survival was significantly longer with benmelstobart plus anlotinib than with sunitinib (19·0 months [95% CI 15·3–22·8] vs 9·8 months [8·4–12·4]; hazard ratio [HR] 0·53 [95% CI 0·42–0·67]; p<0·0001). In the per-protocol set, median progression-free survival was 19·0 months (16·5–22·8) in the benmelstobart–anlotinib group versus 11·0 months (8·5–13·6) in the sunitinib group (HR 0·55 [0·43–0·70]; p<0·0001). The most common grade 3 or worse treatment-related adverse event was hypertension (occurring in 91 [34%] of 264 patients in the benmelstobart–anlotinib group vs 55 [21%] of 264 in the sunitinib group). Serious treatment-related adverse events occurred in 63 (24%) patients in the benmelstobart–anlotinib group and in 42 (16%) patients in the sunitinib group. In the benmelstobart–anlotinib group, three (1%) deaths occurred due to treatment-related adverse events (one each with cardiac-respiratory arrest, unknown reason, and renal failure) and no deaths occurred in the sunitinib group.

Interpretation

Benmelstobart plus anlotinib improved progression-free survival compared with sunitinib among patients with previously untreated, advanced clear-cell renal cell carcinoma. These findings suggest the potential of benmelstobart plus anlotinib as a treatment option for this population.

Funding

Chia Tai Tianqing Pharmaceutical Group and CSCO Clinical Oncology Research Foundation.

Translation

For the Chinese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.
一线benmelstobart + anlotinib vs .舒尼替尼治疗晚期肾细胞癌(ETER100):一项多中心、随机、开放标签的3期试验
PD-L1阻断治疗晚期肾细胞癌的潜力尚未得到充分开发,因此迫切需要新的药物。该试验旨在比较benmelstobart(一种新型PD-L1抑制剂)联合anlotinib与舒尼替尼作为晚期肾细胞癌的一线治疗。seter100是一项多中心、随机、开放标签的3期试验,在中国37个医疗机构进行。我们纳入的患者年龄在18-80岁之间,既往未接受治疗,晚期透明细胞肾细胞癌,东部肿瘤合作组表现状态为0或1。我们随机分配(1:1)患者接受benmelstobart(静脉注射,1200mg,每3周1次)加anlotinib(口服,12mg,每天1次,3周周期的前2周)或舒尼替尼(口服,50mg,每天1次,6周周期的前4周),直到疾病进展、不可接受的毒性、研究者的决定或患者停药。随机化采用分层区随机化(区大小为4),并根据国际转移性肾细胞癌数据库联盟的风险进行分层。主要终点是根据全分析集(即随机分配的接受至少一剂研究药物且未违反关键纳入标准的患者)和单方案集(即:随机分配的患者接受了至少一个周期的方案治疗,没有重大的方案违反,至少有一个疗效评估)。在这篇文章中,我们报告了预先指定的中期分析的结果。这项正在进行的研究已停止招募,注册号码为ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04523272。在2020年8月25日至2023年2月6日期间,我们评估了687名患者的资格,其中531名(77%)患者被随机分配接受本美斯托巴联合安洛替尼(266名[50%]患者)或舒尼替尼(265名[50%]患者)。527例(99%)患者被纳入完整分析集(263例[50%]接受benmelstoobart + anlotinib治疗,264例[50%]接受舒尼替尼治疗)。所有患者均为中国人(男性400例(76%),女性127例(24%)),中位年龄60岁(IQR 54-67)。截止日期(2024年1月31日),中位随访时间为22.8个月(IQR 15.2 - 29.7)。在完整的分析集中,本美斯托巴联合安洛替尼的中位无进展生存期明显长于舒尼替尼(19.0个月[95% CI 15.3 - 22.8] vs 9.8个月[8.4 - 12.4];风险比[HR] 0.53 [95% CI 0.42 - 0.67]; p< 0.0001)。在每个方案集中,benmelstobart-anlotinib组的中位无进展生存期为19.0个月(16.5 - 22.8),而舒尼替尼组的中位无进展生存期为11.0个月(8.5 - 13.6)(HR为0.55 [0.43 - 0.70];p<为0.0001)。最常见的3级或更严重的治疗相关不良事件是高血压(benmelstobart-anlotinib组264例患者中有91例[34%]发生高血压,舒尼替尼组264例患者中有55例[21%]发生高血压)。benmelstobart-anlotinib组中有63例(24%)患者发生严重的治疗相关不良事件,舒尼替尼组中有42例(16%)患者发生严重的治疗相关不良事件。在benmelstobart-anlotinib组中,3例(1%)死亡是由于治疗相关的不良事件(心脏呼吸骤停、不明原因和肾功能衰竭各1例),舒尼替尼组中没有死亡发生。解释:与舒尼替尼相比,本美斯托巴特联合安罗替尼改善了先前未经治疗的晚期透明细胞肾细胞癌患者的无进展生存期。这些研究结果表明,本莫司脱加安洛替尼作为这一人群的治疗选择的潜力。正大天庆药业集团、中sco临床肿瘤研究基金。摘要的中文译文见补充资料部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信