Examining the Relationships Among Teacher Characteristics, Collaboration, AI-Integrated TPACK, and Teacher Enthusiasm: A Multi-Group Analysis by Gender

IF 3.6 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Deniz Kaya, Ömer Faruk Ursavaş, Hatice Yildiz Durak
{"title":"Examining the Relationships Among Teacher Characteristics, Collaboration, AI-Integrated TPACK, and Teacher Enthusiasm: A Multi-Group Analysis by Gender","authors":"Deniz Kaya,&nbsp;Ömer Faruk Ursavaş,&nbsp;Hatice Yildiz Durak","doi":"10.1111/ejed.70216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The aim of this study was to examine the relationships among teacher characteristics, collaboration, the level of artificial intelligence-integrated technological pedagogical content knowledge (AI-TPACK), and teacher enthusiasm, and to comparatively evaluate these relationships through multi-group analysis (MGA) based on gender. The research model was tested using Partial Least Squares–Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM) to analyse the structural relationships among the variables. Data were collected from 323 teachers working at various school levels across the seven geographical regions of Türkiye, representing diversity in terms of educational background, professional experience, and subject area. In addition to the Demographic Information Form, the AI-TPACK Scale, Teacher Enthusiasm Scale, and Teacher Collaboration Scale were used during the data collection process. The findings of the study reveal that teacher collaboration has significant and positive effects on both TPACK and AI-TPACK components. However, age, educational level, professional experience, and school type did not significantly predict teacher collaboration. Pedagogical knowledge (PK), pedagogical content knowledge (PCK), and AI-based technological knowledge (AI-TK) had significant effects on teacher enthusiasm, whereas content knowledge (CK), AI-based technological content knowledge (AI-TCK), AI-based technological pedagogical knowledge (AI-TPK), and AI-TPACK did not show any significant effect. Contextual variables such as ICT usage competence, AI usage experience, and AI usage intensity did not have a significant effect on teacher enthusiasm. Gender-based analysis results revealed that the effects of teacher collaboration on PK, CK, PCK, and AI-TPACK components differed significantly between male and female teachers, whereas the effects on AI-TCK and AI-TPK components were significant only among female teachers. It was found that PK significantly predicted teacher enthusiasm only among female teachers, while AI-TK significantly predicted teacher enthusiasm only among male teachers.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47585,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Education","volume":"60 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejed.70216","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine the relationships among teacher characteristics, collaboration, the level of artificial intelligence-integrated technological pedagogical content knowledge (AI-TPACK), and teacher enthusiasm, and to comparatively evaluate these relationships through multi-group analysis (MGA) based on gender. The research model was tested using Partial Least Squares–Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM) to analyse the structural relationships among the variables. Data were collected from 323 teachers working at various school levels across the seven geographical regions of Türkiye, representing diversity in terms of educational background, professional experience, and subject area. In addition to the Demographic Information Form, the AI-TPACK Scale, Teacher Enthusiasm Scale, and Teacher Collaboration Scale were used during the data collection process. The findings of the study reveal that teacher collaboration has significant and positive effects on both TPACK and AI-TPACK components. However, age, educational level, professional experience, and school type did not significantly predict teacher collaboration. Pedagogical knowledge (PK), pedagogical content knowledge (PCK), and AI-based technological knowledge (AI-TK) had significant effects on teacher enthusiasm, whereas content knowledge (CK), AI-based technological content knowledge (AI-TCK), AI-based technological pedagogical knowledge (AI-TPK), and AI-TPACK did not show any significant effect. Contextual variables such as ICT usage competence, AI usage experience, and AI usage intensity did not have a significant effect on teacher enthusiasm. Gender-based analysis results revealed that the effects of teacher collaboration on PK, CK, PCK, and AI-TPACK components differed significantly between male and female teachers, whereas the effects on AI-TCK and AI-TPK components were significant only among female teachers. It was found that PK significantly predicted teacher enthusiasm only among female teachers, while AI-TK significantly predicted teacher enthusiasm only among male teachers.

检视教师特质、协作、ai整合TPACK与教师热情的关系:基于性别的多群体分析
本研究旨在探讨教师特质、协作、人工智能集成技术教学内容知识水平(AI-TPACK)和教师积极性之间的关系,并通过基于性别的多群体分析(MGA)对这些关系进行比较评价。采用偏最小二乘-结构方程模型(PLS-SEM)对研究模型进行检验,分析各变量之间的结构关系。数据收集自在 rkiye七个地理区域的各级学校工作的323名教师,这些教师在教育背景、专业经验和学科领域方面具有多样性。在数据收集过程中,除了人口统计信息表外,还使用了AI-TPACK量表、教师热情量表和教师协作量表。研究结果表明,教师合作对TPACK和AI-TPACK组件都有显著的正向影响。然而,年龄、教育程度、专业经验和学校类型对教师合作没有显著的预测作用。教学知识(PK)、教学内容知识(PCK)和基于人工智能的技术知识(AI-TK)对教师积极性有显著影响,而内容知识(CK)、基于人工智能的技术内容知识(AI-TCK)、基于人工智能的技术教学知识(AI-TPK)和AI-TPACK对教师积极性没有显著影响。信息通信技术使用能力、人工智能使用经验和人工智能使用强度等语境变量对教师积极性没有显著影响。基于性别的分析结果显示,教师协作对PK、CK、PCK和AI-TPACK成分的影响在男女教师之间存在显著差异,而对AI-TCK和AI-TPK成分的影响仅在女教师之间显著。结果发现,PK仅在女性教师中显著预测教师热情,而AI-TK仅在男性教师中显著预测教师热情。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Education
European Journal of Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: The prime aims of the European Journal of Education are: - To examine, compare and assess education policies, trends, reforms and programmes of European countries in an international perspective - To disseminate policy debates and research results to a wide audience of academics, researchers, practitioners and students of education sciences - To contribute to the policy debate at the national and European level by providing European administrators and policy-makers in international organisations, national and local governments with comparative and up-to-date material centred on specific themes of common interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信