Ameliorated elk herd optimizer for global optimization and engineering problems

IF 13.9 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Mohammed Azmi Al-Betar, Malik Sh. Braik, Qusai Yousef Shambour, Ghazi Al-Naymat, Thantrira Porntaveetus
{"title":"Ameliorated elk herd optimizer for global optimization and engineering problems","authors":"Mohammed Azmi Al-Betar,&nbsp;Malik Sh. Braik,&nbsp;Qusai Yousef Shambour,&nbsp;Ghazi Al-Naymat,&nbsp;Thantrira Porntaveetus","doi":"10.1007/s10462-025-11360-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Optimization techniques have received significant attention for reliably addressing practical problems. A potential meta-heuristic called elk herd optimizer (EHO) was created, inspired by the social behavior and reproduction of elks. EHO has drawbacks, including poor convergence competency and a tendency to fall into local extrema in various optimization problems. Furthermore, this algorithm does not account for the memory of its search agents and has difficulty effectively balancing exploration and exploitation, which can lead to early convergence toward a local optimum. This study addresses the above issues by proposing an ameliorated EHO (AEHO) by incorporating several modifications into the basic EHO algorithm, which can be described as follows: A new hybrid memory-based EHO is developed that uses the particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm to guide EHO to search for reasonable candidate solutions. This hybrid approach was proposed to enhance EHO’s diversity and balance search capabilities to achieve strong search performance. Initially, a memory component was added to EHO using the idea of <i>pbest</i> from PSO to tap into promising search regions, which focuses on improving the best solutions and preventing the algorithm from getting stuck in a local optimum. In addition, the PSO concepts of (<i>gbest</i>) and (<i>pbest</i>) are used to enhance the best placements of the search agents in EHO. Finally, a greedy selection method was used to improve the efficiency of exhaustive exploration in AEHO, using the fitness values before and after updates as an indicator for efficacy of the best solutions. To evaluate the performance of the AEHO algorithm against a group of well-known competitors, we use ten complex test functions from the global CEC2022 test suite and thirty complex test functions from the global CEC2014 test suite. Based on the analysis of the experimental findings, AEHO performed optimally on 84% of the CEC2014 functions and 74% of the CEC2022 functions, ranking first in both suites with an average ranking of 3.11 and 1.62, respectively. The mean computation time of AEHO is about one-third of the average computation time for the first-ranked method, indicating that AEHO not only performs very well in global searches but also exhibits greater search efficiency when compared to newer optimization algorithms. The applicability and reliability of AEHO were thoroughly studied on four constrained engineering design problems and a real-world industrial process. The results demonstrate the superiority and promising potential of AEHO in addressing a wide range of challenging real-world problems.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8449,"journal":{"name":"Artificial Intelligence Review","volume":"58 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":13.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10462-025-11360-1.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Artificial Intelligence Review","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10462-025-11360-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Optimization techniques have received significant attention for reliably addressing practical problems. A potential meta-heuristic called elk herd optimizer (EHO) was created, inspired by the social behavior and reproduction of elks. EHO has drawbacks, including poor convergence competency and a tendency to fall into local extrema in various optimization problems. Furthermore, this algorithm does not account for the memory of its search agents and has difficulty effectively balancing exploration and exploitation, which can lead to early convergence toward a local optimum. This study addresses the above issues by proposing an ameliorated EHO (AEHO) by incorporating several modifications into the basic EHO algorithm, which can be described as follows: A new hybrid memory-based EHO is developed that uses the particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm to guide EHO to search for reasonable candidate solutions. This hybrid approach was proposed to enhance EHO’s diversity and balance search capabilities to achieve strong search performance. Initially, a memory component was added to EHO using the idea of pbest from PSO to tap into promising search regions, which focuses on improving the best solutions and preventing the algorithm from getting stuck in a local optimum. In addition, the PSO concepts of (gbest) and (pbest) are used to enhance the best placements of the search agents in EHO. Finally, a greedy selection method was used to improve the efficiency of exhaustive exploration in AEHO, using the fitness values before and after updates as an indicator for efficacy of the best solutions. To evaluate the performance of the AEHO algorithm against a group of well-known competitors, we use ten complex test functions from the global CEC2022 test suite and thirty complex test functions from the global CEC2014 test suite. Based on the analysis of the experimental findings, AEHO performed optimally on 84% of the CEC2014 functions and 74% of the CEC2022 functions, ranking first in both suites with an average ranking of 3.11 and 1.62, respectively. The mean computation time of AEHO is about one-third of the average computation time for the first-ranked method, indicating that AEHO not only performs very well in global searches but also exhibits greater search efficiency when compared to newer optimization algorithms. The applicability and reliability of AEHO were thoroughly studied on four constrained engineering design problems and a real-world industrial process. The results demonstrate the superiority and promising potential of AEHO in addressing a wide range of challenging real-world problems.

面向全局优化和工程问题的改进麋鹿群优化器
优化技术因其可靠地解决实际问题而受到广泛关注。受麋鹿的社会行为和繁殖的启发,建立了一个潜在的元启发式算法,称为麋鹿群优化器(EHO)。EHO算法的缺点是收敛能力差,在各种优化问题中容易陷入局部极值。此外,该算法不考虑其搜索代理的内存,难以有效地平衡探索和利用,这可能导致早期收敛到局部最优。针对上述问题,本文提出了一种改进的EHO算法(AEHO),该算法在基本EHO算法的基础上进行了一些改进,具体如下:提出了一种新的基于混合记忆的EHO算法,该算法使用粒子群优化(PSO)算法指导EHO寻找合理的候选解。提出这种混合方法是为了增强EHO的多样性和平衡搜索能力,以获得较强的搜索性能。最初,在EHO中加入了一个内存组件,使用PSO中的pbest来挖掘有前途的搜索区域,其重点是改进最佳解决方案,防止算法陷入局部最优。此外,利用(gbest)和(pbest)的粒子群概念来增强EHO中搜索代理的最佳位置。最后,采用贪心选择方法,以更新前后的适应度值作为最优解有效性的指标,提高了AEHO穷举探索的效率。为了评估AEHO算法与一组知名竞争对手的性能,我们使用了来自全球CEC2022测试套件的10个复杂测试函数和来自全球CEC2014测试套件的30个复杂测试函数。通过对实验结果的分析,AEHO在84%的CEC2014功能和74%的CEC2022功能上表现最佳,在两个套件中排名第一,平均排名分别为3.11和1.62。AEHO的平均计算时间约为排名第一的方法的平均计算时间的三分之一,这表明与较新的优化算法相比,AEHO不仅在全局搜索中表现出色,而且具有更高的搜索效率。通过四个约束工程设计问题和一个实际工业过程,深入研究了AEHO的适用性和可靠性。结果表明,AEHO在解决一系列具有挑战性的现实问题方面具有优势和广阔的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Artificial Intelligence Review
Artificial Intelligence Review 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
22.00
自引率
3.30%
发文量
194
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: Artificial Intelligence Review, a fully open access journal, publishes cutting-edge research in artificial intelligence and cognitive science. It features critical evaluations of applications, techniques, and algorithms, providing a platform for both researchers and application developers. The journal includes refereed survey and tutorial articles, along with reviews and commentary on significant developments in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信