Roles of Domain-General Auditory Processing in Second Language Speech Learning Revisited: What Degree of Precision Makes a Difference?

IF 4.2 1区 文学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Kazuya Saito, Adam Tierney
{"title":"Roles of Domain-General Auditory Processing in Second Language Speech Learning Revisited: What Degree of Precision Makes a Difference?","authors":"Kazuya Saito,&nbsp;Adam Tierney","doi":"10.1111/lang.12722","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study expands on the practical application of the critical role of auditory processing in the rate of naturalistic L2 speech acquisition. In Study 1, the prosodic production of English by 46 Chinese college students was tracked over a five-month study abroad program in the UK. Learners with extensive L2 input opportunities demonstrated improvements in prosodic accuracy; however, those with pitch acuity below a certain threshold showed regression, potentially reinforcing L1 interference. To determine what percentage of participants fell below the auditory processing threshold determined in Study 1, Study 2 administered pitch processing tests to 400 Chinese college students learning English, all with normal hearing, and developed a provisional corpus to assess pitch acuity variation within this cohort. The comparison of findings from Studies 1 and 2 suggests that insufficient auditory precision hampers naturalistic L2 learning. Approximately the bottom 1.5 quartiles of the population (35%) may fall below this threshold. These learners could benefit from remedial strategies (e.g., explicit phonetic instruction, auditory training) to fully capitalize on their naturalistic L2 learning opportunities.</p>","PeriodicalId":51371,"journal":{"name":"Language Learning","volume":"75 S1","pages":"97-138"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/lang.12722","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language Learning","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/lang.12722","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study expands on the practical application of the critical role of auditory processing in the rate of naturalistic L2 speech acquisition. In Study 1, the prosodic production of English by 46 Chinese college students was tracked over a five-month study abroad program in the UK. Learners with extensive L2 input opportunities demonstrated improvements in prosodic accuracy; however, those with pitch acuity below a certain threshold showed regression, potentially reinforcing L1 interference. To determine what percentage of participants fell below the auditory processing threshold determined in Study 1, Study 2 administered pitch processing tests to 400 Chinese college students learning English, all with normal hearing, and developed a provisional corpus to assess pitch acuity variation within this cohort. The comparison of findings from Studies 1 and 2 suggests that insufficient auditory precision hampers naturalistic L2 learning. Approximately the bottom 1.5 quartiles of the population (35%) may fall below this threshold. These learners could benefit from remedial strategies (e.g., explicit phonetic instruction, auditory training) to fully capitalize on their naturalistic L2 learning opportunities.

Abstract Image

领域-通用听觉加工在第二语言语音学习中的作用:精确度有多大?
本研究扩展了听觉加工在二语自然习得率中的关键作用的实际应用。在研究1中,研究人员对46名中国大学生在英国为期5个月的留学期间的英语韵律产生进行了跟踪。有大量第二语言输入机会的学习者在韵律准确性方面表现出改善;然而,音高敏锐度低于某一阈值的人表现出退化,可能会加强L1干扰。为了确定低于研究1中确定的听觉处理阈值的参与者百分比,研究2对400名听力正常的中国大学生进行了音高处理测试,并开发了一个临时语料库来评估该队列中音高敏锐度的变化。比较研究1和研究2的结果表明,听觉精确度不足阻碍了自然的二语学习。大约底层1.5四分之一的人口(35%)可能低于这个阈值。这些学习者可以从补救策略(例如,明确的语音指导,听觉训练)中受益,以充分利用他们自然的第二语言学习机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Language Learning
Language Learning Multiple-
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
15.90%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: Language Learning is a scientific journal dedicated to the understanding of language learning broadly defined. It publishes research articles that systematically apply methods of inquiry from disciplines including psychology, linguistics, cognitive science, educational inquiry, neuroscience, ethnography, sociolinguistics, sociology, and anthropology. It is concerned with fundamental theoretical issues in language learning such as child, second, and foreign language acquisition, language education, bilingualism, literacy, language representation in mind and brain, culture, cognition, pragmatics, and intergroup relations. A subscription includes one or two annual supplements, alternating among a volume from the Language Learning Cognitive Neuroscience Series, the Currents in Language Learning Series or the Language Learning Special Issue Series.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信