AI-induced Deskilling in Medicine: A Mixed-Method Review and Research Agenda for Healthcare and Beyond

IF 13.9 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Chiara Natali, Luca Marconi, Leslye Denisse Dias Duran, Federico Cabitza
{"title":"AI-induced Deskilling in Medicine: A Mixed-Method Review and Research Agenda for Healthcare and Beyond","authors":"Chiara Natali,&nbsp;Luca Marconi,&nbsp;Leslye Denisse Dias Duran,&nbsp;Federico Cabitza","doi":"10.1007/s10462-025-11352-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in healthcare is reshaping clinical practice, offering both opportunities for enhanced decision-making and risks of skill degradation among medical professionals. This growing impact calls for a comprehensive evaluation of its effects on medical expertise. This study presents a mixed-method literature review, combining systematic analysis with narrative synthesis to examine AI-induced deskilling and upskilling inhibition-the erosion of medical expertise and the reduction of opportunities for skill acquisition due to AI-driven decision support systems. Anchoring the discussion in the core medical competencies outlined by the <i>Federation of Royal Colleges of Physicians of the UK-Practical Assessment of Clinical Examination Skills</i> (PACES-MRCPUK), the systematic review identifies key vulnerabilities in physical examination, differential diagnosis, clinical judgment, and physician-patient communication. The narrative review explores broader themes related to Human–AI Interaction and the Impact of AI on Human Skills in Organizations. In response to concerns about the <i>Second Singularity</i>-a scenario in which decision-making autonomy is increasingly ceded to AI, weakening human oversight-this review advocates for a research agenda that prioritizes longitudinal studies, real-time monitoring of AI’s impact, and the development of frameworks to mitigate skill erosion, ensuring the preservation of professional autonomy and the safeguarding of the irreplaceable elements of human judgment in medicine and beyond.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8449,"journal":{"name":"Artificial Intelligence Review","volume":"58 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":13.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10462-025-11352-1.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Artificial Intelligence Review","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10462-025-11352-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in healthcare is reshaping clinical practice, offering both opportunities for enhanced decision-making and risks of skill degradation among medical professionals. This growing impact calls for a comprehensive evaluation of its effects on medical expertise. This study presents a mixed-method literature review, combining systematic analysis with narrative synthesis to examine AI-induced deskilling and upskilling inhibition-the erosion of medical expertise and the reduction of opportunities for skill acquisition due to AI-driven decision support systems. Anchoring the discussion in the core medical competencies outlined by the Federation of Royal Colleges of Physicians of the UK-Practical Assessment of Clinical Examination Skills (PACES-MRCPUK), the systematic review identifies key vulnerabilities in physical examination, differential diagnosis, clinical judgment, and physician-patient communication. The narrative review explores broader themes related to Human–AI Interaction and the Impact of AI on Human Skills in Organizations. In response to concerns about the Second Singularity-a scenario in which decision-making autonomy is increasingly ceded to AI, weakening human oversight-this review advocates for a research agenda that prioritizes longitudinal studies, real-time monitoring of AI’s impact, and the development of frameworks to mitigate skill erosion, ensuring the preservation of professional autonomy and the safeguarding of the irreplaceable elements of human judgment in medicine and beyond.

人工智能诱导的医学技能:医疗保健及其他领域的混合方法回顾和研究议程
人工智能(AI)在医疗保健领域的整合正在重塑临床实践,为医疗专业人员提供增强决策的机会和技能退化的风险。这种日益增长的影响要求对其对医疗专业知识的影响进行全面评估。本研究提出了一种混合方法的文献综述,结合系统分析和叙事综合来研究人工智能导致的技能下降和技能提升抑制——由于人工智能驱动的决策支持系统,医疗专业知识的侵蚀和技能获取机会的减少。该系统综述以英国皇家医师学院联合会临床检查技能实用评估(pace - mrcpuk)概述的核心医疗能力为基础,确定了体检、鉴别诊断、临床判断和医患沟通方面的关键弱点。叙述性回顾探讨了与人类-人工智能交互以及人工智能对组织中人类技能的影响相关的更广泛主题。为了回应对第二次奇点的担忧——在这种情况下,决策自主权越来越多地交给人工智能,削弱了人类的监督——这篇综述提倡一个研究议程,优先考虑纵向研究,实时监测人工智能的影响,以及开发框架来减轻技能侵蚀,确保保留专业自主权,并保护人类在医学和其他领域的不可替代的判断要素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Artificial Intelligence Review
Artificial Intelligence Review 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
22.00
自引率
3.30%
发文量
194
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: Artificial Intelligence Review, a fully open access journal, publishes cutting-edge research in artificial intelligence and cognitive science. It features critical evaluations of applications, techniques, and algorithms, providing a platform for both researchers and application developers. The journal includes refereed survey and tutorial articles, along with reviews and commentary on significant developments in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信