Past to Present: The Role of ACEs in Emotion Regulation and Emotion Regulation's Subsequent Association With Relationship Satisfaction in Couple Therapy

IF 2.2 3区 心理学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES
Family Process Pub Date : 2025-08-26 DOI:10.1111/famp.70064
Angela B. Bradford, Min Xu, Lee N. Johnson, Shayne R. Anderson, Richard B Miller, Alyssa Banford Witting, Roy A. Bean, Quintin A. Hunt
{"title":"Past to Present: The Role of ACEs in Emotion Regulation and Emotion Regulation's Subsequent Association With Relationship Satisfaction in Couple Therapy","authors":"Angela B. Bradford,&nbsp;Min Xu,&nbsp;Lee N. Johnson,&nbsp;Shayne R. Anderson,&nbsp;Richard B Miller,&nbsp;Alyssa Banford Witting,&nbsp;Roy A. Bean,&nbsp;Quintin A. Hunt","doi":"10.1111/famp.70064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This study examines the longitudinal associations between relationship satisfaction and emotion regulation (ER) difficulties across 8 sessions of couple therapy. It further tests adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) as a predictor of these constructs and therapeutic alliance as a moderator of the effects of ACEs. A cross-lagged panel model was used to test actor and partner effects in a sample of 972 different-sex couples at intake, session four, and session eight of relationship therapy. Results suggest there is neither a long-term bidirectional relationship between relationship satisfaction and ER difficulties nor that ACEs are directly related to relationship satisfaction for actors. Instead, ACEs predict ER difficulties at session four, through which there is also an indirect effect on ER difficulties at session eight. Additionally, men's ER difficulties at intake predict women's relationship satisfaction at session four. The therapeutic alliance did neither predict nor moderate the effect of ACEs. Clinical implications include assessing for and intervening on the effects of ACEs, attending to men's early ER and its impact on their partners, and treating ER difficulties and relationship satisfaction concurrently in couple therapy.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51396,"journal":{"name":"Family Process","volume":"64 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Process","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/famp.70064","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines the longitudinal associations between relationship satisfaction and emotion regulation (ER) difficulties across 8 sessions of couple therapy. It further tests adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) as a predictor of these constructs and therapeutic alliance as a moderator of the effects of ACEs. A cross-lagged panel model was used to test actor and partner effects in a sample of 972 different-sex couples at intake, session four, and session eight of relationship therapy. Results suggest there is neither a long-term bidirectional relationship between relationship satisfaction and ER difficulties nor that ACEs are directly related to relationship satisfaction for actors. Instead, ACEs predict ER difficulties at session four, through which there is also an indirect effect on ER difficulties at session eight. Additionally, men's ER difficulties at intake predict women's relationship satisfaction at session four. The therapeutic alliance did neither predict nor moderate the effect of ACEs. Clinical implications include assessing for and intervening on the effects of ACEs, attending to men's early ER and its impact on their partners, and treating ER difficulties and relationship satisfaction concurrently in couple therapy.

从过去到现在:ace在情绪调节中的作用以及情绪调节与夫妻治疗中关系满意度的后续关联
本研究考察了8期夫妻治疗中关系满意度与情绪调节困难之间的纵向关系。它进一步测试了不良童年经历(ace)作为这些结构的预测因子和治疗联盟作为ace效应的调节因子。一个交叉滞后的面板模型被用来测试972对不同性别的夫妇在关系治疗的摄入,第四阶段和第八阶段的参与者和伴侣的影响。结果表明,关系满意度与ER困难之间不存在长期的双向关系,ace与行为者的关系满意度之间也不存在直接关系。相反,ace预测第四阶段的急症处理困难,通过它也间接影响第八阶段的急症处理困难。此外,男性在急诊室就诊时遇到的困难预测了女性在第四阶段的关系满意度。治疗联盟既不能预测也不能调节ace的效果。临床意义包括评估和干预ace的影响,关注男性早期ER及其对伴侣的影响,以及在夫妻治疗中同时治疗ER困难和关系满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Family Process
Family Process Multiple-
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
5.10%
发文量
96
期刊介绍: Family Process is an international, multidisciplinary, peer-reviewed journal committed to publishing original articles, including theory and practice, philosophical underpinnings, qualitative and quantitative clinical research, and training in couple and family therapy, family interaction, and family relationships with networks and larger systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信