Contribution of pollinators to delivering fruit quality in commercial sweet cherry orchards

IF 1.1
JSFA reports Pub Date : 2025-05-15 DOI:10.1002/jsf2.70012
Zeus Mateos-Fierro, Michael P. D. Garratt, Michelle T. Fountain, Kate Ashbrook, Duncan B. Westbury
{"title":"Contribution of pollinators to delivering fruit quality in commercial sweet cherry orchards","authors":"Zeus Mateos-Fierro,&nbsp;Michael P. D. Garratt,&nbsp;Michelle T. Fountain,&nbsp;Kate Ashbrook,&nbsp;Duncan B. Westbury","doi":"10.1002/jsf2.70012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Pollinators provide an essential ecosystem service to many crops, including sweet cherry (<i>Prunus avium</i>), which can be quantified in terms of fruit number and/or quality. Most studies in sweet cherry have explored the extent to which fruit set relies on pollinators but have neglected pollinators' contribution to fruit quality. We investigated the impact of pollinators on fruit set (2018–2019) and fruit quality (2017–2019). In 10 commercial sweet cherry orchards under polytunnels, we conducted insect-exclusion experiments comparing insect-excluded blossoms (mesh-bagged blossoms) to blossoms exposed to floral visitors (open blossoms). We then investigated relationships between fruit set and fruit quality.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Pollinators were key to underpinning commercial fruit set (15.4% fruit set from open blossoms compared to 1.1% with bagged blossoms), equivalent to a contribution of 92.8%. Pollinators were also essential to achieving higher cherry fruit quality. With open blossoms, fresh mass, width, dry matter, and flesh/pit ratio of cherries increased by 19.8%, 7.9%, 19.8%, and 10.5%, respectively, compared to cherries from bagged blossoms. In contrast, firmness was similar between both pollination treatments. We did not find a significant relationship between fruit set and quality, suggesting trees did not carry an excessive fruit burden.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Our results highlight the importance of pollinators, not only for underpinning commercial yields in terms of fruit set, but also for higher fruit quality. We recommend growers adopt effective pollinator management practices to help underpin commercially viable yields consisting of fruit with a higher marketable potential.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":93795,"journal":{"name":"JSFA reports","volume":"5 8","pages":"330-336"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://scijournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jsf2.70012","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JSFA reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://scijournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jsf2.70012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Pollinators provide an essential ecosystem service to many crops, including sweet cherry (Prunus avium), which can be quantified in terms of fruit number and/or quality. Most studies in sweet cherry have explored the extent to which fruit set relies on pollinators but have neglected pollinators' contribution to fruit quality. We investigated the impact of pollinators on fruit set (2018–2019) and fruit quality (2017–2019). In 10 commercial sweet cherry orchards under polytunnels, we conducted insect-exclusion experiments comparing insect-excluded blossoms (mesh-bagged blossoms) to blossoms exposed to floral visitors (open blossoms). We then investigated relationships between fruit set and fruit quality.

Results

Pollinators were key to underpinning commercial fruit set (15.4% fruit set from open blossoms compared to 1.1% with bagged blossoms), equivalent to a contribution of 92.8%. Pollinators were also essential to achieving higher cherry fruit quality. With open blossoms, fresh mass, width, dry matter, and flesh/pit ratio of cherries increased by 19.8%, 7.9%, 19.8%, and 10.5%, respectively, compared to cherries from bagged blossoms. In contrast, firmness was similar between both pollination treatments. We did not find a significant relationship between fruit set and quality, suggesting trees did not carry an excessive fruit burden.

Conclusion

Our results highlight the importance of pollinators, not only for underpinning commercial yields in terms of fruit set, but also for higher fruit quality. We recommend growers adopt effective pollinator management practices to help underpin commercially viable yields consisting of fruit with a higher marketable potential.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

传粉媒介对商业甜樱桃果园果实品质的贡献
传粉者为许多作物提供重要的生态系统服务,包括甜樱桃(Prunus avium),这可以通过果实数量和/或质量来量化。大多数关于甜樱桃的研究都探讨了果实对传粉媒介的依赖程度,但忽视了传粉媒介对果实质量的贡献。研究了传粉媒介对坐果(2018-2019)和果实品质(2017-2019)的影响。在10个综合隧道下的商业甜樱桃园进行了昆虫排斥实验,比较了昆虫排斥花(网袋花)和暴露花(开放花)。然后,我们研究了坐果与果实品质之间的关系。结果传粉媒介是支撑商品坐果的关键媒介(开放开花坐果占15.4%,袋装开花坐果占1.1%),贡献率为92.8%。传粉者对提高樱桃果实质量也至关重要。开花期樱桃鲜质量、宽度、干物质和果核比分别比袋装期樱桃高19.8%、7.9%、19.8%和10.5%。相比之下,两种授粉处理之间的硬度相似。我们没有发现果实结实和质量之间的显著关系,这表明树木没有携带过多的果实负担。结论我们的研究结果强调了传粉媒介的重要性,不仅在支撑结实的商业产量方面,而且在提高果实质量方面。我们建议种植者采取有效的传粉媒介管理措施,以帮助巩固商业上可行的产量,包括具有更高市场潜力的水果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信