{"title":"A Systematic Review of Task Automation in Surgical Robotics","authors":"Thomas E. Shkurti;M. Cenk Çavuşoğlu","doi":"10.1109/TMRB.2025.3583182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The physically challenging and time-consuming nature of robotic minimally invasive surgery (RMIS) presents an incentive for automation of routine surgical tasks. We perform a comprehensive review of the current state of the art in the automation of laparoscopic surgical robots for the tasks of suturing, retraction, incision/dissection/resection, palpation, and debridement. Particular attention is paid to the various performance metrics employed by different studies, and methodological accommodations that differ from operating-room conditions. We conclude that the field remains in an exploratory state and rigorous definitions of success or performance in a given subtask have yet to materialize.","PeriodicalId":73318,"journal":{"name":"IEEE transactions on medical robotics and bionics","volume":"7 3","pages":"863-880"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE transactions on medical robotics and bionics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11051014/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The physically challenging and time-consuming nature of robotic minimally invasive surgery (RMIS) presents an incentive for automation of routine surgical tasks. We perform a comprehensive review of the current state of the art in the automation of laparoscopic surgical robots for the tasks of suturing, retraction, incision/dissection/resection, palpation, and debridement. Particular attention is paid to the various performance metrics employed by different studies, and methodological accommodations that differ from operating-room conditions. We conclude that the field remains in an exploratory state and rigorous definitions of success or performance in a given subtask have yet to materialize.