Opportunities to Fill Gaps in Reference Methods for Vitamins in Foods and Dietary Supplements.

IF 1.7
Erik J M Konings, Philippe J Eugster, Jinchuan Yang, Shulin Feng, Kai Liu, Elaine Jobgen, Eystein Oveland
{"title":"Opportunities to Fill Gaps in Reference Methods for Vitamins in Foods and Dietary Supplements.","authors":"Erik J M Konings, Philippe J Eugster, Jinchuan Yang, Shulin Feng, Kai Liu, Elaine Jobgen, Eystein Oveland","doi":"10.1093/jaoacint/qsaf074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A recent review concluded that most current international reference methods to accurately determine vitamin content in foods and food supplements are no longer fit-for-purpose. Most reference methods originate from the 1990's and science, technology, and statutory regulations have changed considerably since.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>AOAC INTERNATIONAL hosted a symposium during its annual meeting in Baltimore in August 2024 to highlight and discuss method gaps and share cutting-edge technology/methods for future consideration as reference methods for vitamins in foods and dietary supplements.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Five invited speakers discussed gaps, opportunities and priorities when it comes to future reference method needs in the area of vitamins in foods and dietary supplements.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Speakers successively advocated for: 1. Harmonization of analytical methods which is closely related to the harmonization of definitions on what compounds to include and the expression of results with a focus on retinol and retinyl esters as an example. 2. At present there is no way to verify or validate the type of vitamin E on nutrition labels. Chiral analysis is needed to differentiate the type of vitamin E between natural and synthetic, which is needed to express the amount of bioactive vitamin E. 3. With the objective to develop a cost- and time-efficient method that is accurate and able to quantify all B-vitamins, a LC-ECI-MS/MS method for the simultaneous determination of six B-vitamins: B1, B2, B3, B5, B6 and B7 in foods was presented as potential new reference method. 4. Attention was requested for the different types of ingredient manufacturing processes, which can cause significant challenges for accurate and precise testing of vitamins.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Opportunities discussed gave a good perspective of future priorities to be considered when establishing new reference methods for the determination of vitamins in foods and dietary supplements.</p>","PeriodicalId":94064,"journal":{"name":"Journal of AOAC International","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of AOAC International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jaoacint/qsaf074","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A recent review concluded that most current international reference methods to accurately determine vitamin content in foods and food supplements are no longer fit-for-purpose. Most reference methods originate from the 1990's and science, technology, and statutory regulations have changed considerably since.

Objective: AOAC INTERNATIONAL hosted a symposium during its annual meeting in Baltimore in August 2024 to highlight and discuss method gaps and share cutting-edge technology/methods for future consideration as reference methods for vitamins in foods and dietary supplements.

Methods: Five invited speakers discussed gaps, opportunities and priorities when it comes to future reference method needs in the area of vitamins in foods and dietary supplements.

Results: Speakers successively advocated for: 1. Harmonization of analytical methods which is closely related to the harmonization of definitions on what compounds to include and the expression of results with a focus on retinol and retinyl esters as an example. 2. At present there is no way to verify or validate the type of vitamin E on nutrition labels. Chiral analysis is needed to differentiate the type of vitamin E between natural and synthetic, which is needed to express the amount of bioactive vitamin E. 3. With the objective to develop a cost- and time-efficient method that is accurate and able to quantify all B-vitamins, a LC-ECI-MS/MS method for the simultaneous determination of six B-vitamins: B1, B2, B3, B5, B6 and B7 in foods was presented as potential new reference method. 4. Attention was requested for the different types of ingredient manufacturing processes, which can cause significant challenges for accurate and precise testing of vitamins.

Conclusion: Opportunities discussed gave a good perspective of future priorities to be considered when establishing new reference methods for the determination of vitamins in foods and dietary supplements.

填补食品和膳食补充剂中维生素参考方法空白的机会。
背景:最近的一项综述得出结论,目前大多数用于准确测定食品和食品补充剂中维生素含量的国际参考方法已不再适用。大多数参考方法起源于20世纪90年代,此后科学、技术和法律法规发生了很大变化。目的:AOAC INTERNATIONAL于2024年8月在巴尔的摩举行的年度会议期间举办了一次研讨会,以突出和讨论方法差距,并分享尖端技术/方法,以供将来考虑作为食品和膳食补充剂中维生素的参考方法。方法:五位特邀演讲者讨论了食品和膳食补充剂中维生素的未来参考方法需求的差距,机会和优先事项。结果:演讲者先后主张:1;分析方法的统一,这与包括哪些化合物的定义的统一和结果的表达密切相关,以视黄醇和视黄醇酯为例。2. 目前还没有办法核实或确认营养标签上维生素E的种类。为了区分天然维生素E和合成维生素E的类型,需要进行手性分析,以表达生物活性维生素E的含量。为了建立一种成本高、时间短、能准确定量所有b族维生素的方法,建立了同时测定食品中B1、B2、B3、B5、B6和B7 6种b族维生素的LC-ECI-MS/MS方法,作为一种有潜力的新参考方法。4. 需要注意的是不同类型的成分制造过程,这可能对维生素的准确和精确测试造成重大挑战。结论:讨论的机会为建立食品和膳食补充剂中维生素测定的新参考方法提供了良好的前景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信