Safety and efficacy of adjuvant fecal microbiota transplantation therapy in patients with diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Yunzhen Lei , Jiaying Diao , Yiyue Tang , Shanshan Yao , Nanqu Huang , Min Xu , Xingli Hu , Qianfeng Jiang
{"title":"Safety and efficacy of adjuvant fecal microbiota transplantation therapy in patients with diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Yunzhen Lei ,&nbsp;Jiaying Diao ,&nbsp;Yiyue Tang ,&nbsp;Shanshan Yao ,&nbsp;Nanqu Huang ,&nbsp;Min Xu ,&nbsp;Xingli Hu ,&nbsp;Qianfeng Jiang","doi":"10.1016/j.prerep.2025.100059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Exploring the Safety and Efficacy of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in Treating Diabetes Mellitus</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A systematic search was conducted across four databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase) for relevant studies published up to March 2025. The primary outcomes of interest included glycemic parameters, such as glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting blood glucose (FBG), Postprandial 2-Hour Blood Glucose (2H-PBG), fasting C-peptide (FCP), and postprandial 2-Hour C-peptide (2H-FCP). Secondary outcomes included lipid profiles, blood pressure, and uric acid levels. Heterogeneity was assessed using Cochran’s <em>Q</em> test and the <em>I²</em> statistic. A fixed-effects model was employed when no significant heterogeneity was observed (<em>I²</em> &lt; 50 % or <em>P</em> ≥ 0.10 for the <em>Q</em> test); otherwise, a random-effects model was applied. For outcomes reported in consistent units, weighted mean difference (WMD) were calculated, while standardized mean difference (SMD) were used for outcomes measured in different units. Subgroup analyses were performed to assess the effects of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) on different types of diabetes mellitus and various intervention protocols. Meta-regression was conducted to explore potential factors influencing the effects of FMT on glucose metabolism. Publication bias was evaluated using Begg’s and Egger’s tests, with <em>P</em> &lt; 0.05 indicating potential bias. The quality of evidence for all outcomes was assessed using the GRADE framework.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>This meta-analysis included 6 studies to investigate the effects of adjunctive FMT on glycemic and metabolic parameters in patients receiving conventional treatment. The results demonstrated that FMT supplementation significantly reduced 2H-PBG [SMD −2.74, 95 % CI: −3.78 to −0.63], TG [WMD −0.32, 95 % CI: −0.57 to −0.08], and ALT [WMD −2.67, 95 % CI: −4.56 to −0.78]. Subgroup analysis by diabetes type revealed that FMT exhibited a favorable trend in lowering 2H-PBG in both type 1 diabetes (T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients. Notably, FMT significantly decreased FCP and 2H-FCP in T1D patients but increased these parameters in T2D patients. Additionally, FMT was found to reduce homeostasis model assessment of β-cell function (HOMA-β) in T2D patients, while showing no significant impact on T1D patients. Subgroup analysis by intervention modality indicated that both oral capsule administration and feeding tube delivery exhibited trends toward reducing 2H-FCP. Meta-regression identified that patients with lower baseline levels of TC and LDL derived greater glycemic benefits from FMT. No significant adverse events were reported across all included studies. Evidence quality assessment classified DBP, TC, TG, LDL, and uric acid as low-quality evidence; weight, BMI, HbA1c, FBG, 2H-PBG, FCP, 2H-FCP, HOMA-β, SBP, HDL, alanine aminotransferase(ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and creatinine as moderate-quality evidence, and Homeostasis Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance(HOMA-IR) as high-quality evidence.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>When combined with conventional treatment regimens, adjunctive FMT may provide additional improvements in postprandial blood glucose and TC in patients. Notably, FMT may offer more pronounced advantages in glycemic parameters for individuals with lower baseline levels of TC and LDL. However, the safety profile of FMT requires further validation through extended follow-up periods to comprehensively assess long-term outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101015,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacological Research - Reports","volume":"4 ","pages":"Article 100059"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacological Research - Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950200425000333","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Exploring the Safety and Efficacy of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in Treating Diabetes Mellitus

Methods

A systematic search was conducted across four databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase) for relevant studies published up to March 2025. The primary outcomes of interest included glycemic parameters, such as glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting blood glucose (FBG), Postprandial 2-Hour Blood Glucose (2H-PBG), fasting C-peptide (FCP), and postprandial 2-Hour C-peptide (2H-FCP). Secondary outcomes included lipid profiles, blood pressure, and uric acid levels. Heterogeneity was assessed using Cochran’s Q test and the statistic. A fixed-effects model was employed when no significant heterogeneity was observed ( < 50 % or P ≥ 0.10 for the Q test); otherwise, a random-effects model was applied. For outcomes reported in consistent units, weighted mean difference (WMD) were calculated, while standardized mean difference (SMD) were used for outcomes measured in different units. Subgroup analyses were performed to assess the effects of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) on different types of diabetes mellitus and various intervention protocols. Meta-regression was conducted to explore potential factors influencing the effects of FMT on glucose metabolism. Publication bias was evaluated using Begg’s and Egger’s tests, with P < 0.05 indicating potential bias. The quality of evidence for all outcomes was assessed using the GRADE framework.

Results

This meta-analysis included 6 studies to investigate the effects of adjunctive FMT on glycemic and metabolic parameters in patients receiving conventional treatment. The results demonstrated that FMT supplementation significantly reduced 2H-PBG [SMD −2.74, 95 % CI: −3.78 to −0.63], TG [WMD −0.32, 95 % CI: −0.57 to −0.08], and ALT [WMD −2.67, 95 % CI: −4.56 to −0.78]. Subgroup analysis by diabetes type revealed that FMT exhibited a favorable trend in lowering 2H-PBG in both type 1 diabetes (T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients. Notably, FMT significantly decreased FCP and 2H-FCP in T1D patients but increased these parameters in T2D patients. Additionally, FMT was found to reduce homeostasis model assessment of β-cell function (HOMA-β) in T2D patients, while showing no significant impact on T1D patients. Subgroup analysis by intervention modality indicated that both oral capsule administration and feeding tube delivery exhibited trends toward reducing 2H-FCP. Meta-regression identified that patients with lower baseline levels of TC and LDL derived greater glycemic benefits from FMT. No significant adverse events were reported across all included studies. Evidence quality assessment classified DBP, TC, TG, LDL, and uric acid as low-quality evidence; weight, BMI, HbA1c, FBG, 2H-PBG, FCP, 2H-FCP, HOMA-β, SBP, HDL, alanine aminotransferase(ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and creatinine as moderate-quality evidence, and Homeostasis Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance(HOMA-IR) as high-quality evidence.

Conclusion

When combined with conventional treatment regimens, adjunctive FMT may provide additional improvements in postprandial blood glucose and TC in patients. Notably, FMT may offer more pronounced advantages in glycemic parameters for individuals with lower baseline levels of TC and LDL. However, the safety profile of FMT requires further validation through extended follow-up periods to comprehensively assess long-term outcomes.
辅助粪便菌群移植治疗糖尿病患者的安全性和有效性:一项系统综述和荟萃分析
目的探讨粪便微生物群移植治疗糖尿病的安全性和有效性方法系统检索PubMed、Cochrane Library、Web of Science和Embase四个数据库,检索截至2025年3月发表的相关研究。主要结局包括血糖参数,如糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)、空腹血糖(FBG)、餐后2小时血糖(2H-PBG)、空腹c肽(FCP)和餐后2小时c肽(2H-FCP)。次要结局包括血脂、血压和尿酸水平。采用Cochran’s Q检验和I²统计量评估异质性。当未观察到显著异质性时采用固定效应模型(Q检验为I²<; 50 %或P ≥ 0.10);否则,采用随机效应模型。对于一致单位报告的结果,计算加权平均差(WMD),而对不同单位测量的结果使用标准化平均差(SMD)。通过亚组分析评估粪便微生物群移植(FMT)对不同类型糖尿病和不同干预方案的影响。meta回归探讨FMT对糖代谢影响的潜在因素。采用Begg’s和Egger’s检验评价发表偏倚,P <; 0.05表示潜在偏倚。使用GRADE框架评估所有结果的证据质量。结果本荟萃分析纳入6项研究,探讨辅助FMT对接受常规治疗患者血糖和代谢参数的影响。结果表明,FMT补充显著降低2H-PBG [SMD - 2.74, 95 % CI:−3.78至−0.63],TG [WMD - 0.32, 95 % CI:−0.57至−0.08]和ALT [WMD - 2.67, 95 % CI:−4.56至−0.78]。糖尿病类型亚组分析显示,FMT在降低1型糖尿病(T1D)和2型糖尿病(T2D)患者的2H-PBG方面均有良好的趋势。值得注意的是,FMT显著降低了T1D患者的FCP和2H-FCP,但增加了T2D患者的这些参数。此外,FMT还降低了T2D患者体内稳态模型中β细胞功能(HOMA-β)的评估,而对T1D患者没有显著影响。干预方式亚组分析显示,口服胶囊和饲管给药均有降低2H-FCP的趋势。荟萃回归发现,基线TC和LDL水平较低的患者从FMT中获得了更大的血糖益处。所有纳入的研究均未报告明显的不良事件。证据质量评价将舒张压、TC、TG、LDL和尿酸归为低质量证据;体重、BMI、HbA1c、FBG、2H-PBG、FCP、2H-FCP、HOMA-β、SBP、HDL、丙氨酸转氨酶(ALT)、天冬氨酸转氨酶(AST)和肌酐为中等质量证据,胰岛素抵抗稳态模型评估(HOMA- ir)为高质量证据。结论与常规治疗方案联合,辅助FMT可进一步改善患者餐后血糖和TC。值得注意的是,对于TC和LDL基线水平较低的个体,FMT可能在血糖参数方面提供更明显的优势。然而,FMT的安全性需要通过延长随访期来进一步验证,以全面评估长期结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信