Evaluation of evapotranspiration models integrating convolutional neural network-predicted leaf area for Pak Choi (Brassica campestris ssp. chinensis) in greenhouse environments

IF 4.2 2区 农林科学 Q1 HORTICULTURE
Young-Bae Choi , In-bok Lee
{"title":"Evaluation of evapotranspiration models integrating convolutional neural network-predicted leaf area for Pak Choi (Brassica campestris ssp. chinensis) in greenhouse environments","authors":"Young-Bae Choi ,&nbsp;In-bok Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.scienta.2025.114339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study evaluates how predicted leaf area index (LAI) affects evapotranspiration (ET) model performance and uncertainty in greenhouse Pak Choi cultivation. Five ET models (Penman-Monteith, Stanghellini, Fynn, Shin, and Baille) were compared using both measured and Convolutional Neural Network-Predicted LAI data. Greenhouse environment experiments from June to August 2021 provided validation data under controlled conditions. LAI was estimated using image analysis with high accuracy (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.9986, RMSE = 0.0547 m<sup>2</sup>·m<sup>−2</sup>). Sensitivity analysis revealed that ET models were most responsive to radiation and LAI variations, with lower sensitivity to air temperature and relative humidity. Among physical models, the Fynn model demonstrated superior performance based on ET prediction accuracy (R<sup>2</sup> &gt; 0.87), while the Shin model excelled among simplified approaches (R<sup>2</sup> &gt; 0.92). Uncertainty propagation analysis revealed that the Stanghellini model exhibited the highest sensitivity to LAI estimation errors (12.55 W·m<sup>−2</sup> error when LAI error = 1.0 m<sup>2</sup>·m<sup>−2</sup>), whereas the Penman–Monteith model showed minimal sensitivity. Model performance remained consistent when using predicted versus measured LAI (R<sup>2</sup> &gt; 0.99 for all models), indicating the robustness of image-based LAI estimation for ET modelling. This research provides quantitative insights into model selection and uncertainty assessment for precision irrigation management in protected cultivation systems, with particular applicability to leafy vegetable crops under controlled greenhouse conditions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21679,"journal":{"name":"Scientia Horticulturae","volume":"350 ","pages":"Article 114339"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientia Horticulturae","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304423825003887","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HORTICULTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study evaluates how predicted leaf area index (LAI) affects evapotranspiration (ET) model performance and uncertainty in greenhouse Pak Choi cultivation. Five ET models (Penman-Monteith, Stanghellini, Fynn, Shin, and Baille) were compared using both measured and Convolutional Neural Network-Predicted LAI data. Greenhouse environment experiments from June to August 2021 provided validation data under controlled conditions. LAI was estimated using image analysis with high accuracy (R2 = 0.9986, RMSE = 0.0547 m2·m−2). Sensitivity analysis revealed that ET models were most responsive to radiation and LAI variations, with lower sensitivity to air temperature and relative humidity. Among physical models, the Fynn model demonstrated superior performance based on ET prediction accuracy (R2 > 0.87), while the Shin model excelled among simplified approaches (R2 > 0.92). Uncertainty propagation analysis revealed that the Stanghellini model exhibited the highest sensitivity to LAI estimation errors (12.55 W·m−2 error when LAI error = 1.0 m2·m−2), whereas the Penman–Monteith model showed minimal sensitivity. Model performance remained consistent when using predicted versus measured LAI (R2 > 0.99 for all models), indicating the robustness of image-based LAI estimation for ET modelling. This research provides quantitative insights into model selection and uncertainty assessment for precision irrigation management in protected cultivation systems, with particular applicability to leafy vegetable crops under controlled greenhouse conditions.
利用卷积神经网络预测白菜叶面积的蒸散模型评价。在温室环境中
本研究评估了预测叶面积指数(LAI)对温室白菜栽培蒸散发(ET)模型性能和不确定性的影响。使用测量和卷积神经网络预测的LAI数据比较了五种ET模型(Penman-Monteith, Stanghellini, Fynn, Shin和Baille)。2021年6月至8月的温室环境试验提供了受控条件下的验证数据。利用图像分析估算LAI,准确度较高(R2 = 0.9986, RMSE = 0.0547 m2·m−2)。敏感性分析表明,ET模式对辐射和LAI变化的响应最大,对气温和相对湿度的敏感性较低。在物理模型中,基于ET预测精度(R2 >;0.87),而Shin模型在简化方法中表现优异(R2 >;0.92)。不确定性传播分析表明,当LAI误差为1.0 m2·m−2时,Stanghellini模型对LAI估计误差的敏感性最高(误差为12.55 W·m−2),而Penman-Monteith模型对LAI估计误差的敏感性最低。当使用预测LAI和测量LAI时,模型性能保持一致(R2 >;所有模型均为0.99),表明基于图像的LAI估计对ET建模具有鲁棒性。本研究为保护栽培系统精准灌溉管理的模型选择和不确定性评估提供了定量见解,特别适用于受控温室条件下的叶菜作物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Scientia Horticulturae
Scientia Horticulturae 农林科学-园艺
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
4.70%
发文量
796
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Scientia Horticulturae is an international journal publishing research related to horticultural crops. Articles in the journal deal with open or protected production of vegetables, fruits, edible fungi and ornamentals under temperate, subtropical and tropical conditions. Papers in related areas (biochemistry, micropropagation, soil science, plant breeding, plant physiology, phytopathology, etc.) are considered, if they contain information of direct significance to horticulture. Papers on the technical aspects of horticulture (engineering, crop processing, storage, transport etc.) are accepted for publication only if they relate directly to the living product. In the case of plantation crops, those yielding a product that may be used fresh (e.g. tropical vegetables, citrus, bananas, and other fruits) will be considered, while those papers describing the processing of the product (e.g. rubber, tobacco, and quinine) will not. The scope of the journal includes all horticultural crops but does not include speciality crops such as, medicinal crops or forestry crops, such as bamboo. Basic molecular studies without any direct application in horticulture will not be considered for this journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信