Efficacy, pharmacokinetics and safety of iscalimab (CFZ533) in patients with proliferative lupus nephritis: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase II study.
Nan Shen, Julia Weinmann-Menke, Ana Malvar, André Serra-Roma, Markus Weiss, Rambabu Danekula, Carole Sips, Jan Rohr, Renaud Felten, Peter Gergely, Tamas Shisha
{"title":"Efficacy, pharmacokinetics and safety of iscalimab (CFZ533) in patients with proliferative lupus nephritis: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase II study.","authors":"Nan Shen, Julia Weinmann-Menke, Ana Malvar, André Serra-Roma, Markus Weiss, Rambabu Danekula, Carole Sips, Jan Rohr, Renaud Felten, Peter Gergely, Tamas Shisha","doi":"10.1136/rmdopen-2025-005557","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Iscalimab (CFZ533) is a novel, anti-CD40 monoclonal antibody. This study evaluated the efficacy, pharmacokinetics and safety of iscalimab versus placebo as add-on to standard-of-care (SoC) therapy in patients with biopsy-proven active proliferative lupus nephritis (LN).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a phase II, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre study including patients with a diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus with active LN. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive either intravenous iscalimab (10 mg/kg) or placebo for 24 weeks on top of SoC for LN. The primary efficacy endpoint was the ratio from baseline in urinary protein-to-creatinine ratio (UPCR) at week 24. Safety assessments included adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs (SAEs) during treatment and follow-up up to 49 weeks.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Of the 57 patients (iscalimab, n=39; placebo, n=18) randomised, 31 (54.4%) completed the study. The primary efficacy endpoint was met: at week 24, the relative improvement from baseline in proteinuria (UPCR) was 63.1% and 36.3% in the iscalimab and placebo arms, respectively. UPCR to baseline at week 24 showed a statistically significant reduction of 42.1% in the iscalimab versus placebo arm. Most AEs were of mild to moderate severity in both treatment arms. Overall, seven SAEs were reported in six patients (15.4%) in the iscalimab arm versus four in three patients (16.7%) in the placebo arm.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Iscalimab showed a significant improvement in proteinuria (UPCR) in patients with active LN. Iscalimab was generally well tolerated with the exception of a few severe infections and one case of macrophage-activation syndrome in immunosuppressed and comorbid patients.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT03610516.</p>","PeriodicalId":21396,"journal":{"name":"RMD Open","volume":"11 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12352177/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RMD Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2025-005557","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Iscalimab (CFZ533) is a novel, anti-CD40 monoclonal antibody. This study evaluated the efficacy, pharmacokinetics and safety of iscalimab versus placebo as add-on to standard-of-care (SoC) therapy in patients with biopsy-proven active proliferative lupus nephritis (LN).
Methods: This was a phase II, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre study including patients with a diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus with active LN. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive either intravenous iscalimab (10 mg/kg) or placebo for 24 weeks on top of SoC for LN. The primary efficacy endpoint was the ratio from baseline in urinary protein-to-creatinine ratio (UPCR) at week 24. Safety assessments included adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs (SAEs) during treatment and follow-up up to 49 weeks.
Findings: Of the 57 patients (iscalimab, n=39; placebo, n=18) randomised, 31 (54.4%) completed the study. The primary efficacy endpoint was met: at week 24, the relative improvement from baseline in proteinuria (UPCR) was 63.1% and 36.3% in the iscalimab and placebo arms, respectively. UPCR to baseline at week 24 showed a statistically significant reduction of 42.1% in the iscalimab versus placebo arm. Most AEs were of mild to moderate severity in both treatment arms. Overall, seven SAEs were reported in six patients (15.4%) in the iscalimab arm versus four in three patients (16.7%) in the placebo arm.
Interpretation: Iscalimab showed a significant improvement in proteinuria (UPCR) in patients with active LN. Iscalimab was generally well tolerated with the exception of a few severe infections and one case of macrophage-activation syndrome in immunosuppressed and comorbid patients.
期刊介绍:
RMD Open publishes high quality peer-reviewed original research covering the full spectrum of musculoskeletal disorders, rheumatism and connective tissue diseases, including osteoporosis, spine and rehabilitation. Clinical and epidemiological research, basic and translational medicine, interesting clinical cases, and smaller studies that add to the literature are all considered.