Efficacy, pharmacokinetics and safety of iscalimab (CFZ533) in patients with proliferative lupus nephritis: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase II study.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY
Nan Shen, Julia Weinmann-Menke, Ana Malvar, André Serra-Roma, Markus Weiss, Rambabu Danekula, Carole Sips, Jan Rohr, Renaud Felten, Peter Gergely, Tamas Shisha
{"title":"Efficacy, pharmacokinetics and safety of iscalimab (CFZ533) in patients with proliferative lupus nephritis: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase II study.","authors":"Nan Shen, Julia Weinmann-Menke, Ana Malvar, André Serra-Roma, Markus Weiss, Rambabu Danekula, Carole Sips, Jan Rohr, Renaud Felten, Peter Gergely, Tamas Shisha","doi":"10.1136/rmdopen-2025-005557","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Iscalimab (CFZ533) is a novel, anti-CD40 monoclonal antibody. This study evaluated the efficacy, pharmacokinetics and safety of iscalimab versus placebo as add-on to standard-of-care (SoC) therapy in patients with biopsy-proven active proliferative lupus nephritis (LN).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a phase II, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre study including patients with a diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus with active LN. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive either intravenous iscalimab (10 mg/kg) or placebo for 24 weeks on top of SoC for LN. The primary efficacy endpoint was the ratio from baseline in urinary protein-to-creatinine ratio (UPCR) at week 24. Safety assessments included adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs (SAEs) during treatment and follow-up up to 49 weeks.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Of the 57 patients (iscalimab, n=39; placebo, n=18) randomised, 31 (54.4%) completed the study. The primary efficacy endpoint was met: at week 24, the relative improvement from baseline in proteinuria (UPCR) was 63.1% and 36.3% in the iscalimab and placebo arms, respectively. UPCR to baseline at week 24 showed a statistically significant reduction of 42.1% in the iscalimab versus placebo arm. Most AEs were of mild to moderate severity in both treatment arms. Overall, seven SAEs were reported in six patients (15.4%) in the iscalimab arm versus four in three patients (16.7%) in the placebo arm.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Iscalimab showed a significant improvement in proteinuria (UPCR) in patients with active LN. Iscalimab was generally well tolerated with the exception of a few severe infections and one case of macrophage-activation syndrome in immunosuppressed and comorbid patients.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT03610516.</p>","PeriodicalId":21396,"journal":{"name":"RMD Open","volume":"11 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12352177/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RMD Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2025-005557","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Iscalimab (CFZ533) is a novel, anti-CD40 monoclonal antibody. This study evaluated the efficacy, pharmacokinetics and safety of iscalimab versus placebo as add-on to standard-of-care (SoC) therapy in patients with biopsy-proven active proliferative lupus nephritis (LN).

Methods: This was a phase II, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre study including patients with a diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus with active LN. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive either intravenous iscalimab (10 mg/kg) or placebo for 24 weeks on top of SoC for LN. The primary efficacy endpoint was the ratio from baseline in urinary protein-to-creatinine ratio (UPCR) at week 24. Safety assessments included adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs (SAEs) during treatment and follow-up up to 49 weeks.

Findings: Of the 57 patients (iscalimab, n=39; placebo, n=18) randomised, 31 (54.4%) completed the study. The primary efficacy endpoint was met: at week 24, the relative improvement from baseline in proteinuria (UPCR) was 63.1% and 36.3% in the iscalimab and placebo arms, respectively. UPCR to baseline at week 24 showed a statistically significant reduction of 42.1% in the iscalimab versus placebo arm. Most AEs were of mild to moderate severity in both treatment arms. Overall, seven SAEs were reported in six patients (15.4%) in the iscalimab arm versus four in three patients (16.7%) in the placebo arm.

Interpretation: Iscalimab showed a significant improvement in proteinuria (UPCR) in patients with active LN. Iscalimab was generally well tolerated with the exception of a few severe infections and one case of macrophage-activation syndrome in immunosuppressed and comorbid patients.

Trial registration number: NCT03610516.

iscalimab (CFZ533)在增殖性狼疮性肾炎患者中的疗效、药代动力学和安全性:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的II期研究
背景:Iscalimab (CFZ533)是一种新型抗cd40单克隆抗体。本研究评估了iscalimab与安慰剂作为标准治疗(SoC)的辅助治疗在活检证实的活动性增生性狼疮性肾炎(LN)患者中的疗效、药代动力学和安全性。方法:这是一项II期、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、多中心研究,包括诊断为系统性红斑狼疮合并活动性LN的患者。患者被随机分配(2:1)接受静脉注射iscalimab (10mg /kg)或安慰剂,在SoC治疗LN的基础上持续24周。主要疗效终点是第24周时尿蛋白与肌酐比值(UPCR)与基线的比值。安全性评估包括治疗期间的不良事件(ae)和严重ae (sae),随访时间长达49周。结果:57例患者(iscalimab, n=39;安慰剂组(n=18)随机分组,31例(54.4%)完成研究。主要疗效终点达到了:在第24周,iscalimab组和安慰剂组的蛋白尿(UPCR)相对于基线的相对改善分别为63.1%和36.3%。第24周时,与安慰剂组相比,iscalimab组的UPCR达到基线水平,统计学上显著降低42.1%。在两个治疗组中,大多数ae的严重程度均为轻度至中度。总体而言,iscalimab组中6例患者(15.4%)报告了7例sae,而安慰剂组中3例患者(16.7%)报告了4例sae。解释:依斯卡利单抗对活动性LN患者的蛋白尿(UPCR)有显著改善。除了少数严重感染和一例免疫抑制和合并症患者的巨噬细胞激活综合征外,伊斯卡利单抗总体耐受良好。试验注册号:NCT03610516。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
RMD Open
RMD Open RHEUMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
6.50%
发文量
205
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: RMD Open publishes high quality peer-reviewed original research covering the full spectrum of musculoskeletal disorders, rheumatism and connective tissue diseases, including osteoporosis, spine and rehabilitation. Clinical and epidemiological research, basic and translational medicine, interesting clinical cases, and smaller studies that add to the literature are all considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信