Jinyue Yu, Craig Paterson, Phillippa Davies, Jennifer C Palmer, Julian P T Higgins, Kathreena M Kurian
{"title":"Evaluating liquid biopsy biomarkers for early detection of brain metastasis: A systematic review.","authors":"Jinyue Yu, Craig Paterson, Phillippa Davies, Jennifer C Palmer, Julian P T Higgins, Kathreena M Kurian","doi":"10.1093/nop/npaf032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Brain metastases (BMs) are the most common intracranial malignancy in adults, contributing significantly to cancer-related morbidity and mortality. Early detection is critical for optimizing treatment and improving survival. This systematic review evaluates the diagnostic potential of liquid biopsy biomarkers for detecting BM from lung, breast, and other cancers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, and BIOSIS databases using keywords related to liquid biopsy, biomarkers, and BMs. Data on participant characteristics, diagnostic reference standards, types of biomarkers, primary cancer origins, and diagnostic outcomes were independently extracted. Diagnostic performance was evaluated using sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC). Risk of bias was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-one studies involving 5676 participants were included, assessing biomarkers such as cfDNA, miRNAs, proteins (eg, neurofilament light [NfL], glial fibrillary acidic protein [GFAP], S100B), metabolomic profiles, and multi-marker models. NfL and GFAP emerged as the most promising biomarkers, demonstrating moderate to strong diagnostic performance across multiple cancer types. Multi-marker models combining NfL and GFAP achieved sensitivity and specificity exceeding 90%. S100B showed variable performance due to differences in study designs and thresholds. Emerging biomarkers like cfDNA and metabolomic profiles showed potential but require further validation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Liquid biopsy biomarkers, particularly NfL and GFAP, hold promise for non-invasive BM detection. Clinical utility may be in the initial cancer workup for localized tumor to prompt brain imaging. Future research is required to validate biomarkers in larger, diverse populations across different cancer types.</p>","PeriodicalId":19234,"journal":{"name":"Neuro-oncology practice","volume":"12 4","pages":"600-617"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12349767/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuro-oncology practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/nop/npaf032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Brain metastases (BMs) are the most common intracranial malignancy in adults, contributing significantly to cancer-related morbidity and mortality. Early detection is critical for optimizing treatment and improving survival. This systematic review evaluates the diagnostic potential of liquid biopsy biomarkers for detecting BM from lung, breast, and other cancers.
Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, and BIOSIS databases using keywords related to liquid biopsy, biomarkers, and BMs. Data on participant characteristics, diagnostic reference standards, types of biomarkers, primary cancer origins, and diagnostic outcomes were independently extracted. Diagnostic performance was evaluated using sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC). Risk of bias was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool.
Results: Thirty-one studies involving 5676 participants were included, assessing biomarkers such as cfDNA, miRNAs, proteins (eg, neurofilament light [NfL], glial fibrillary acidic protein [GFAP], S100B), metabolomic profiles, and multi-marker models. NfL and GFAP emerged as the most promising biomarkers, demonstrating moderate to strong diagnostic performance across multiple cancer types. Multi-marker models combining NfL and GFAP achieved sensitivity and specificity exceeding 90%. S100B showed variable performance due to differences in study designs and thresholds. Emerging biomarkers like cfDNA and metabolomic profiles showed potential but require further validation.
Conclusions: Liquid biopsy biomarkers, particularly NfL and GFAP, hold promise for non-invasive BM detection. Clinical utility may be in the initial cancer workup for localized tumor to prompt brain imaging. Future research is required to validate biomarkers in larger, diverse populations across different cancer types.
期刊介绍:
Neuro-Oncology Practice focuses on the clinical aspects of the subspecialty for practicing clinicians and healthcare specialists from a variety of disciplines including physicians, nurses, physical/occupational therapists, neuropsychologists, and palliative care specialists, who have focused their careers on clinical patient care and who want to apply the latest treatment advances to their practice. These include: Applying new trial results to improve standards of patient care Translating scientific advances such as tumor molecular profiling and advanced imaging into clinical treatment decision making and personalized brain tumor therapies Raising awareness of basic, translational and clinical research in areas of symptom management, survivorship, neurocognitive function, end of life issues and caregiving