Customer awareness and perceptions of the high in fat, sugar, and salt (HFSS) placement legislation and impacts on self-reported food purchasing

IF 6 1区 经济学 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY
Alice R. Kininmonth , Victoria L. Jenneson , Francesca Pontin , Jason C.G. Halford , Alexandra M. Johnstone , Michelle A. Morris , Alison Fildes , the DIO Food Team
{"title":"Customer awareness and perceptions of the high in fat, sugar, and salt (HFSS) placement legislation and impacts on self-reported food purchasing","authors":"Alice R. Kininmonth ,&nbsp;Victoria L. Jenneson ,&nbsp;Francesca Pontin ,&nbsp;Jason C.G. Halford ,&nbsp;Alexandra M. Johnstone ,&nbsp;Michelle A. Morris ,&nbsp;Alison Fildes ,&nbsp;the DIO Food Team","doi":"10.1016/j.foodpol.2025.102941","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Legislation in England restricts the placement of high in fat, sugar or salt (HFSS) products in stores and online. This is the first study to investigate shoppers’ perceptions, and self-reported purchasing behaviours following its implementation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A sample of 1968 adults, living in England, who were the primary shopper for the household completed online surveys, with oversampling of lower incomes (households earning less than £39,999 annually).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Most purchased products from HFSS-dominated categories at least once/week (92.5 %). Shoppers with children or those living with food insecurity reported purchasing HFSS-dominated products more frequently and reported greater susceptibility to product placement and price-promotion strategies targeted by the current and planned HFSS legislation. The majority of shoppers surveyed were not aware of the HFSS legislation (58.7%), and most did not notice any changes to the shopping environment, either online (79.8%) or in-store (56.1%). Most felt the legislation was a good first step (71.4). However, 90% felt affordability of healthier food was as or more important than legislation of less healthy foods.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>While shoppers supported the legislation’s potential to encourage healthier food choices, they emphasised the importance of affordability. Households with children or those living with food insecurity are particularly susceptible to retail promotional strategies. To support these shoppers, future legislation should also consider promoting healthier foods to reduce dietary inequalities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":321,"journal":{"name":"Food Policy","volume":"135 ","pages":"Article 102941"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Policy","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306919225001460","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Legislation in England restricts the placement of high in fat, sugar or salt (HFSS) products in stores and online. This is the first study to investigate shoppers’ perceptions, and self-reported purchasing behaviours following its implementation.

Methods

A sample of 1968 adults, living in England, who were the primary shopper for the household completed online surveys, with oversampling of lower incomes (households earning less than £39,999 annually).

Results

Most purchased products from HFSS-dominated categories at least once/week (92.5 %). Shoppers with children or those living with food insecurity reported purchasing HFSS-dominated products more frequently and reported greater susceptibility to product placement and price-promotion strategies targeted by the current and planned HFSS legislation. The majority of shoppers surveyed were not aware of the HFSS legislation (58.7%), and most did not notice any changes to the shopping environment, either online (79.8%) or in-store (56.1%). Most felt the legislation was a good first step (71.4). However, 90% felt affordability of healthier food was as or more important than legislation of less healthy foods.

Conclusion

While shoppers supported the legislation’s potential to encourage healthier food choices, they emphasised the importance of affordability. Households with children or those living with food insecurity are particularly susceptible to retail promotional strategies. To support these shoppers, future legislation should also consider promoting healthier foods to reduce dietary inequalities.
消费者对高脂、高糖、高盐食品(HFSS)法规的认识和认知及其对自我报告食品购买的影响
英国立法限制高脂肪、高糖或高盐(HFSS)产品在商店和网上的销售。这是第一个调查消费者认知的研究,以及在实施后自我报告的购买行为。方法对1968名生活在英格兰的成年人进行抽样调查,这些成年人是家庭的主要购物者,他们完成了在线调查,并对收入较低的家庭(年收入低于39,999英镑的家庭)进行了抽样调查。结果每周至少有1次(92.5%)购买hfss主导品类产品。有孩子的购物者或生活在食品不安全状况下的购物者报告说,他们更频繁地购买HFSS主导的产品,并且更容易受到当前和计划中的HFSS立法针对的产品植入和价格促销策略的影响。接受调查的大多数购物者(58.7%)不知道HFSS立法,大多数人没有注意到购物环境的任何变化,无论是在线(79.8%)还是实体店(56.1%)。大多数人认为立法是良好的第一步(71.4)。然而,90%的人认为健康食品的可负担性与不健康食品的立法同等重要,甚至更重要。尽管购物者支持该立法鼓励选择更健康的食品的潜力,但他们强调了可负担性的重要性。有孩子的家庭或粮食不安全的家庭特别容易受到零售促销策略的影响。为了支持这些消费者,未来的立法还应考虑推广更健康的食品,以减少饮食不平等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Food Policy
Food Policy 管理科学-农业经济与政策
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.60%
发文量
128
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: Food Policy is a multidisciplinary journal publishing original research and novel evidence on issues in the formulation, implementation, and evaluation of policies for the food sector in developing, transition, and advanced economies. Our main focus is on the economic and social aspect of food policy, and we prioritize empirical studies informing international food policy debates. Provided that articles make a clear and explicit contribution to food policy debates of international interest, we consider papers from any of the social sciences. Papers from other disciplines (e.g., law) will be considered only if they provide a key policy contribution, and are written in a style which is accessible to a social science readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信