Evaluating Measurement Invariance Over Time for a Personal Opportunities Scale for People With IDD: Implications for Policy and Practice.

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q2 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Sarah Lineberry, Michael D Broda, Parthenia Dinora, Matthew Bogenschutz, Seb Prohn, Angela West
{"title":"Evaluating Measurement Invariance Over Time for a Personal Opportunities Scale for People With IDD: Implications for Policy and Practice.","authors":"Sarah Lineberry, Michael D Broda, Parthenia Dinora, Matthew Bogenschutz, Seb Prohn, Angela West","doi":"10.1352/1934-9556-63.4.315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Personal opportunities refer to chances for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) to take self-directed action based on their interests, strengths, and preferences. This study tested for measurement invariance across five years of cross-sectional data, including data collected during the COVID-19 pandemic, to determine whether the scale performed consistently over time. Analysis revealed significant differences in both the National Core Indicators In-Person Survey (NCI-IPS) outcomes and in the Personal Opportunities scale. Measurement invariance testing indicated partial threshold and loading invariance, but not intercept invariance, suggesting that the ways in which participants perceived or responded to scale items changed over time. We recommend that researchers utilizing scaled measures with longitudinal outcomes employ statistical checks, including measurement invariance, to ensure the scale performs consistently over time.</p>","PeriodicalId":47489,"journal":{"name":"Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities","volume":"63 4","pages":"315-328"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1352/1934-9556-63.4.315","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Personal opportunities refer to chances for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) to take self-directed action based on their interests, strengths, and preferences. This study tested for measurement invariance across five years of cross-sectional data, including data collected during the COVID-19 pandemic, to determine whether the scale performed consistently over time. Analysis revealed significant differences in both the National Core Indicators In-Person Survey (NCI-IPS) outcomes and in the Personal Opportunities scale. Measurement invariance testing indicated partial threshold and loading invariance, but not intercept invariance, suggesting that the ways in which participants perceived or responded to scale items changed over time. We recommend that researchers utilizing scaled measures with longitudinal outcomes employ statistical checks, including measurement invariance, to ensure the scale performs consistently over time.

评估IDD患者个人机会量表随时间的测量不变性:对政策和实践的影响。
个人机会是指有智力和发育障碍(IDD)的人根据自己的兴趣、优势和偏好采取自主行动的机会。本研究测试了5年横截面数据(包括在COVID-19大流行期间收集的数据)的测量不变性,以确定该量表是否随时间保持一致。分析显示,在国家核心指标亲自调查(NCI-IPS)结果和个人机会量表上都存在显著差异。测量不变性测试显示了部分阈值不变性和负荷不变性,但没有显示截距不变性,这表明参与者对量表项目的感知或反应方式随着时间的推移而改变。我们建议研究人员使用纵向结果的尺度测量采用统计检查,包括测量不变性,以确保量表在一段时间内表现一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
11.10%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities is dedicated to meeting the information needs of those who seek effective ways to help people with mental retardation. The journal reports new teaching approaches, program developments, administrative tools, program evaluation, service utilization studies, community surveys, public policy issues, training and case studies, and current research in mental retardation. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities is a peer-reviewed journal whose consulting editors represent a broad spectrum of settings: universities, research centers, public and private residential care facilities, and specialized community service agencies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信