{"title":"Older adults' care networks and the pathways to unmet needs.","authors":"Jyoti Savla, Zhe Wang","doi":"10.1093/geroni/igaf063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Older adults differ widely both in the care they require and in who provides them care, often reporting significant unmet needs for assistance. Few studies have simultaneously considered the type of disability (self-care, mobility, and household activities) and multisource care networks (kin, extended-kin, non-kin, and paid help) to understand factors influencing unmet care needs among community-living older adults.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Using data from the National Health and Aging Trends Study (2011; <i>N</i> = 3,265; <i>M</i> <sub>Age</sub> [<i>SD</i>] = 77 [7.74] years, 62% women), we conducted a latent class analysis to identify care network types based on older adults' functional limitations and caregiver sources. Multinomial logistic regression models predicted network membership based on personal and structural predictors. Zero-inflated Poisson regression examined the relationship between network type and unmet care needs 1 year later.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven distinct care network types emerged, characterized by combinations of caregiving sources and disability domains. Kin caregivers were involved across all network types. Older adults coresiding with kin typically received minimal paid help, which significantly increased their likelihood of unmet care needs in the subsequent year. Networks predominantly relying on non-kin caregivers tended to not use paid services and exhibited higher unmet care needs. Mismatches between disability type and the assistance received (e.g., requiring self-care assistance but primarily receiving household help) were associated with unmet care needs in the subsequent year.</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>The provision of adequate care was contingent upon the direct alignment of caregiving tasks with the functional limitations of aging adults and the effective coordination of informal and formal care resources. Enhancing care alignment through targeted assessments, supplementing family caregiving with formal services, and promoting coordinated caregiving arrangements could substantially reduce unmet care needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":13596,"journal":{"name":"Innovation in Aging","volume":"9 7","pages":"igaf063"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12342885/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovation in Aging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaf063","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and objectives: Older adults differ widely both in the care they require and in who provides them care, often reporting significant unmet needs for assistance. Few studies have simultaneously considered the type of disability (self-care, mobility, and household activities) and multisource care networks (kin, extended-kin, non-kin, and paid help) to understand factors influencing unmet care needs among community-living older adults.
Research design and methods: Using data from the National Health and Aging Trends Study (2011; N = 3,265; MAge [SD] = 77 [7.74] years, 62% women), we conducted a latent class analysis to identify care network types based on older adults' functional limitations and caregiver sources. Multinomial logistic regression models predicted network membership based on personal and structural predictors. Zero-inflated Poisson regression examined the relationship between network type and unmet care needs 1 year later.
Results: Seven distinct care network types emerged, characterized by combinations of caregiving sources and disability domains. Kin caregivers were involved across all network types. Older adults coresiding with kin typically received minimal paid help, which significantly increased their likelihood of unmet care needs in the subsequent year. Networks predominantly relying on non-kin caregivers tended to not use paid services and exhibited higher unmet care needs. Mismatches between disability type and the assistance received (e.g., requiring self-care assistance but primarily receiving household help) were associated with unmet care needs in the subsequent year.
Discussion and implications: The provision of adequate care was contingent upon the direct alignment of caregiving tasks with the functional limitations of aging adults and the effective coordination of informal and formal care resources. Enhancing care alignment through targeted assessments, supplementing family caregiving with formal services, and promoting coordinated caregiving arrangements could substantially reduce unmet care needs.
期刊介绍:
Innovation in Aging, an interdisciplinary Open Access journal of the Gerontological Society of America (GSA), is dedicated to publishing innovative, conceptually robust, and methodologically rigorous research focused on aging and the life course. The journal aims to present studies with the potential to significantly enhance the health, functionality, and overall well-being of older adults by translating scientific insights into practical applications. Research published in the journal spans a variety of settings, including community, clinical, and laboratory contexts, with a clear emphasis on issues that are directly pertinent to aging and the dynamics of life over time. The content of the journal mirrors the diverse research interests of GSA members and encompasses a range of study types. These include the validation of new conceptual or theoretical models, assessments of factors impacting the health and well-being of older adults, evaluations of interventions and policies, the implementation of groundbreaking research methodologies, interdisciplinary research that adapts concepts and methods from other fields to aging studies, and the use of modeling and simulations to understand factors and processes influencing aging outcomes. The journal welcomes contributions from scholars across various disciplines, such as technology, engineering, architecture, economics, business, law, political science, public policy, education, public health, social and psychological sciences, biomedical and health sciences, and the humanities and arts, reflecting a holistic approach to advancing knowledge in gerontology.