Relational Leadership in the Age of AI: Rethinking Pedagogy for Medical Affairs

IF 0.6 Q4 MANAGEMENT
Iain A. Kaan, Marie Daniels, Jodi Tainton
{"title":"Relational Leadership in the Age of AI: Rethinking Pedagogy for Medical Affairs","authors":"Iain A. Kaan,&nbsp;Marie Daniels,&nbsp;Jodi Tainton","doi":"10.1002/jls.70018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In healthcare settings where structural change is slow and leadership is distributed across roles, the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into leadership education introduces both promise and complexity. The current paper distinguishes between generative AI, systems that create new content and insights, and algorithmic AI, which automates predefined tasks within leadership training contexts. Yet, these tools risk embedding algorithmic bias and reinforcing Western-centric leadership ideals, raising ethical, cultural, and pedagogical concerns. The current paper examines the implications of AI-enabled leadership education through theoretical lenses, including complexity leadership, cultural dimensions theory, and relational pedagogy. It explores how AI systems reshape power within learning environments, shifting emphasis from relational mentorship to behavioral optimization. Drawing on Foucauldian concepts of discipline and visibility, the analysis shows how data-driven models may prioritize conformity over ethical discernment and reduce leadership to a technical artifact. To address these risks, the paper proposes a Relational-AI Pedagogy Model that positions AI as a supportive tool within a relational and culturally adaptive leadership education framework. This approach balances the efficiencies of AI with human judgment, mentorship, and cultural responsiveness. By integrating technological and relational strengths, the model offers a path for pharmaceutical organizations to develop KOLs who are not only scientifically credible but also ethically grounded and culturally responsive within diverse leadership contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":45503,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Leadership Studies","volume":"19 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Leadership Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jls.70018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In healthcare settings where structural change is slow and leadership is distributed across roles, the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into leadership education introduces both promise and complexity. The current paper distinguishes between generative AI, systems that create new content and insights, and algorithmic AI, which automates predefined tasks within leadership training contexts. Yet, these tools risk embedding algorithmic bias and reinforcing Western-centric leadership ideals, raising ethical, cultural, and pedagogical concerns. The current paper examines the implications of AI-enabled leadership education through theoretical lenses, including complexity leadership, cultural dimensions theory, and relational pedagogy. It explores how AI systems reshape power within learning environments, shifting emphasis from relational mentorship to behavioral optimization. Drawing on Foucauldian concepts of discipline and visibility, the analysis shows how data-driven models may prioritize conformity over ethical discernment and reduce leadership to a technical artifact. To address these risks, the paper proposes a Relational-AI Pedagogy Model that positions AI as a supportive tool within a relational and culturally adaptive leadership education framework. This approach balances the efficiencies of AI with human judgment, mentorship, and cultural responsiveness. By integrating technological and relational strengths, the model offers a path for pharmaceutical organizations to develop KOLs who are not only scientifically credible but also ethically grounded and culturally responsive within diverse leadership contexts.

人工智能时代的关系领导:对医学事务教学法的反思
在结构变化缓慢且领导力分散的医疗保健环境中,将人工智能(AI)集成到领导力教育中既带来了希望,也带来了复杂性。当前的论文区分了生成式人工智能和算法人工智能,前者是创造新内容和见解的系统,后者是在领导力培训背景下自动化预定义任务的系统。然而,这些工具可能会嵌入算法偏见,强化以西方为中心的领导理想,引发道德、文化和教学方面的担忧。本文通过理论视角,包括复杂性领导力、文化维度理论和关系教育学,考察了人工智能领导力教育的含义。它探讨了人工智能系统如何在学习环境中重塑权力,将重点从关系指导转向行为优化。利用福柯的纪律和可见性概念,分析显示了数据驱动的模型如何优先考虑一致性而不是道德洞察力,并将领导力降低为技术工件。为了解决这些风险,本文提出了一个关系-人工智能教学法模型,该模型将人工智能定位为关系和文化适应性领导力教育框架中的支持性工具。这种方法平衡了人工智能的效率与人类的判断、指导和文化响应。通过整合技术和关系优势,该模型为制药组织发展kol提供了一条道路,这些kol不仅在科学上可信,而且在不同的领导背景下具有道德基础和文化响应性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
33
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信