Humanoid robotics and agentic AI: reframing management theories and future research directions

IF 7.3 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Pawel Korzynski , Autumn Edwards , Mahesh C. Gupta , Grzegorz Mazurek , Jochen Wirtz
{"title":"Humanoid robotics and agentic AI: reframing management theories and future research directions","authors":"Pawel Korzynski ,&nbsp;Autumn Edwards ,&nbsp;Mahesh C. Gupta ,&nbsp;Grzegorz Mazurek ,&nbsp;Jochen Wirtz","doi":"10.1016/j.emj.2025.06.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div><span><span>The development of humanoid robots<span> and artificial intelligence (AI) agents represents two distinct but complementary advancements in replicating human capabilities in physical and digital environments. This duality reflects a broader shift toward physical AI a term used to describe embodied AI systems capable of interacting with the physical world through movement and perception - of which humanoid robots are a prominent example. Our paper explores how these technologies reshape and extend established management theories across three disciplines—human resource management (HRM), marketing and consumer behavior (CB), and </span></span>operations management (OM). Specifically, we propose that in HRM, humanoid robots challenge team role theory by introducing machine-oriented roles, such as trainers and testers, while AI agents prompt a rethinking of </span>social learning theory<span><span> through their capacity to enable behavior simulation and dynamic feedback loops. In marketing and CB, AI agents reconfigure value co-creation within service-dominant logic by acting as autonomous co-creators of value, while humanoid robots influence social agency theory by altering perceptions of trust and power dynamics. In OM, these technologies drive new opportunities for throughput, agility, and process optimization by integrating real-time predictive analytics and adaptive </span>workflow automation. These insights emphasize that while many traditional theories remain relevant, they require adaptation to account for human–machine collaboration, machine agency, and the hybrid roles emerging in organizational contexts.</span></div></div>","PeriodicalId":48290,"journal":{"name":"European Management Journal","volume":"43 4","pages":"Pages 548-560"},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Management Journal","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263237325000908","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The development of humanoid robots and artificial intelligence (AI) agents represents two distinct but complementary advancements in replicating human capabilities in physical and digital environments. This duality reflects a broader shift toward physical AI a term used to describe embodied AI systems capable of interacting with the physical world through movement and perception - of which humanoid robots are a prominent example. Our paper explores how these technologies reshape and extend established management theories across three disciplines—human resource management (HRM), marketing and consumer behavior (CB), and operations management (OM). Specifically, we propose that in HRM, humanoid robots challenge team role theory by introducing machine-oriented roles, such as trainers and testers, while AI agents prompt a rethinking of social learning theory through their capacity to enable behavior simulation and dynamic feedback loops. In marketing and CB, AI agents reconfigure value co-creation within service-dominant logic by acting as autonomous co-creators of value, while humanoid robots influence social agency theory by altering perceptions of trust and power dynamics. In OM, these technologies drive new opportunities for throughput, agility, and process optimization by integrating real-time predictive analytics and adaptive workflow automation. These insights emphasize that while many traditional theories remain relevant, they require adaptation to account for human–machine collaboration, machine agency, and the hybrid roles emerging in organizational contexts.
人形机器人与人工智能:重构管理理论与未来研究方向
人形机器人和人工智能(AI)代理的发展代表了在物理和数字环境中复制人类能力的两种不同但互补的进步。这种二元性反映了向物理人工智能的更广泛转变,物理人工智能是一个术语,用于描述能够通过运动和感知与物理世界互动的嵌入式人工智能系统,人形机器人就是一个突出的例子。我们的论文探讨了这些技术如何在人力资源管理(HRM)、营销和消费者行为(CB)以及运营管理(OM)这三个学科中重塑和扩展现有的管理理论。具体而言,我们提出,在人力资源管理中,人形机器人通过引入面向机器的角色(如培训师和测试员)来挑战团队角色理论,而人工智能代理通过其实现行为模拟和动态反馈循环的能力,促使人们重新思考社会学习理论。在市场营销和CB中,人工智能代理通过充当价值的自主共同创造者,在服务主导的逻辑中重新配置价值共同创造,而人形机器人通过改变对信任和权力动态的看法来影响社会代理理论。在OM中,这些技术通过集成实时预测分析和自适应工作流自动化,为吞吐量、敏捷性和流程优化带来了新的机会。这些见解强调,虽然许多传统理论仍然相关,但它们需要适应人机协作、机器代理和组织环境中出现的混合角色。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.90
自引率
5.30%
发文量
113
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: The European Management Journal (EMJ) stands as a premier scholarly publication, disseminating cutting-edge research spanning all realms of management. EMJ articles challenge conventional wisdom through rigorously informed empirical and theoretical inquiries, offering fresh insights and innovative perspectives on key management themes while remaining accessible and engaging for a wide readership. EMJ articles embody intellectual curiosity and embrace diverse methodological approaches, yielding contributions that significantly influence both management theory and practice. We actively seek interdisciplinary research that integrates distinct research traditions to illuminate contemporary challenges within the expansive domain of European business and management. We strongly encourage cross-cultural investigations addressing the unique challenges faced by European management scholarship and practice in navigating global issues and contexts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信