Assessment of a Smartphone-Based Neural Network Application for the Risk Assessment of Skin Lesions under Real-World Conditions.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 DERMATOLOGY
Teresa Kränke, Philipp Efferl, Katharina Tripolt-Droschl, Rainer Hofmann-Wellenhof
{"title":"Assessment of a Smartphone-Based Neural Network Application for the Risk Assessment of Skin Lesions under Real-World Conditions.","authors":"Teresa Kränke, Philipp Efferl, Katharina Tripolt-Droschl, Rainer Hofmann-Wellenhof","doi":"10.5826/dpc.1503a5110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The diagnostic performance of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) in diagnosing different types of skin cancer has been quite promising. Mobile phone applications with integrated artificial intelligence (AI) are an understudied area.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We evaluated the risk assessment of the SkinScreener (Medaia GmbH, Graz, Austria) AI-based algorithm in comparison with an expert panel of three dermatologists.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective single-center study at the Department of Dermatology and Venereology in Graz, Austria. Photographs of lesions were taken by the users' mobile phone cameras. The algorithm allocated them to three risk classes. Blinded to AI's results, the images were evaluated by three dermatologists-our reference standard. A consensus was defined as at least a two-thirds majority.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,428 skin lesions were included. In 902 lesions (63.16%), there was full agreement, and in 441 lesions (30.88%) a two-thirds majority was reached. Eighty-five lesions (5.69%) had to be discussed in a joint review process. The tested algorithm reached a sensitivity of 76.9% (95% CI: 71.7%-81.5%) and a specificity of 80.9% (95% CI: 78.5%-83.2%). Overall accuracy results were 77.2%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results indicate that the tested mobile phone algorithm is a valuable tool for the correct risk classification of various skin lesions. As expected, its performance is worse than in a professional setting. Nonetheless, the use of these applications on mobile phones should raise awareness of skin cancer and encourage users to deal more intensively with preventive measures. In light of our results, these applications are also reliable for use by non-professionals.</p>","PeriodicalId":11168,"journal":{"name":"Dermatology practical & conceptual","volume":"15 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12339068/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dermatology practical & conceptual","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5826/dpc.1503a5110","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The diagnostic performance of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) in diagnosing different types of skin cancer has been quite promising. Mobile phone applications with integrated artificial intelligence (AI) are an understudied area.

Objective: We evaluated the risk assessment of the SkinScreener (Medaia GmbH, Graz, Austria) AI-based algorithm in comparison with an expert panel of three dermatologists.

Methods: In this retrospective single-center study at the Department of Dermatology and Venereology in Graz, Austria. Photographs of lesions were taken by the users' mobile phone cameras. The algorithm allocated them to three risk classes. Blinded to AI's results, the images were evaluated by three dermatologists-our reference standard. A consensus was defined as at least a two-thirds majority.

Results: A total of 1,428 skin lesions were included. In 902 lesions (63.16%), there was full agreement, and in 441 lesions (30.88%) a two-thirds majority was reached. Eighty-five lesions (5.69%) had to be discussed in a joint review process. The tested algorithm reached a sensitivity of 76.9% (95% CI: 71.7%-81.5%) and a specificity of 80.9% (95% CI: 78.5%-83.2%). Overall accuracy results were 77.2%.

Conclusions: Our results indicate that the tested mobile phone algorithm is a valuable tool for the correct risk classification of various skin lesions. As expected, its performance is worse than in a professional setting. Nonetheless, the use of these applications on mobile phones should raise awareness of skin cancer and encourage users to deal more intensively with preventive measures. In light of our results, these applications are also reliable for use by non-professionals.

基于智能手机的神经网络在皮肤病变风险评估中的应用
导论:卷积神经网络(cnn)在诊断不同类型皮肤癌方面的诊断表现非常有前景。集成人工智能(AI)的手机应用是一个研究不足的领域。目的:我们评估了SkinScreener (Medaia GmbH, Graz, Austria)基于人工智能的算法的风险评估,并与三位皮肤科医生组成的专家组进行了比较。方法:在奥地利格拉茨皮肤病和性病科进行的回顾性单中心研究。病变的照片由使用者的手机相机拍摄。该算法将它们划分为三个风险等级。对人工智能的结果不知情,图像由三名皮肤科医生评估,这是我们的参考标准。共识被定义为至少三分之二的多数。结果:共纳入1428例皮肤病变。902例(63.16%)完全符合,441例(30.88%)达到三分之二多数。85个病变(5.69%)必须在联合复查过程中进行讨论。经检验的算法灵敏度为76.9% (95% CI: 71.7%-81.5%),特异性为80.9% (95% CI: 78.5%-83.2%)。总体准确率为77.2%。结论:我们的研究结果表明,测试的手机算法是对各种皮肤病变进行正确风险分类的有价值的工具。正如预期的那样,它的表现比专业环境更差。尽管如此,在移动电话上使用这些应用程序应该提高人们对皮肤癌的认识,并鼓励用户更深入地采取预防措施。根据我们的结果,这些应用程序对于非专业人员来说也是可靠的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
217
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信