Parent–Child Discrepancies in Perceived Parental Coparenting During the COVID-19 Lockdown: Associations With Chinese Adolescents' Emotional Well-Being

IF 2.2 3区 心理学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES
Family Process Pub Date : 2025-08-12 DOI:10.1111/famp.70061
Jiefeng Ying, Sihan Liu, Jialin Shi, Yizhen Ren, Xiaoqing Yu, Xinchun Wu
{"title":"Parent–Child Discrepancies in Perceived Parental Coparenting During the COVID-19 Lockdown: Associations With Chinese Adolescents' Emotional Well-Being","authors":"Jiefeng Ying,&nbsp;Sihan Liu,&nbsp;Jialin Shi,&nbsp;Yizhen Ren,&nbsp;Xiaoqing Yu,&nbsp;Xinchun Wu","doi":"10.1111/famp.70061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Parent–child discrepancies in reports of perceived parenting behaviors are common and have been linked to adolescent mental health. However, little is known about these discrepancies for parenting behaviors involving the father–mother–child triad, such as coparenting, and their impact on adolescents' emotional well-being, especially during extraordinary circumstances such as lockdowns during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study tested a mediating model to examine whether and how discrepancy patterns are associated with depression and anxiety in adolescents through emotion regulation strategies (e.g., expressive suppression, cognitive reappraisal) among Chinese families during the pandemic. The participants included 747 adolescents (48.6% male; <i>M</i><sub><i>age</i></sub> = 13.26 years, <i>SD</i> = 3.39) and both their mothers and fathers. Adolescents completed assessments of perceived parental coparenting behaviors, emotion regulation strategies, depression, and anxiety. Parents completed assessments of their own coparenting behaviors. Latent profile analysis with a person-centered approach was used to identify four profiles of parent–child discrepancies in negative coparenting and three profiles in positive coparenting. Adolescents who reported more negative coparenting (i.e., conflict and disparagement) or less positive coparenting (i.e., integrity and reprimand) than their parents adopted increased expressive suppression and decreased cognitive reappraisal, which were associated with higher levels of depression and anxiety during the pandemic. This study emphasizes the importance of comprehending the patterns of parent–child discrepancies in family dynamics and highlights the practical importance of improving emotion regulation strategies in adolescents from maladaptive family patterns to maintain their emotional well-being.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51396,"journal":{"name":"Family Process","volume":"64 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Process","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/famp.70061","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Parent–child discrepancies in reports of perceived parenting behaviors are common and have been linked to adolescent mental health. However, little is known about these discrepancies for parenting behaviors involving the father–mother–child triad, such as coparenting, and their impact on adolescents' emotional well-being, especially during extraordinary circumstances such as lockdowns during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study tested a mediating model to examine whether and how discrepancy patterns are associated with depression and anxiety in adolescents through emotion regulation strategies (e.g., expressive suppression, cognitive reappraisal) among Chinese families during the pandemic. The participants included 747 adolescents (48.6% male; Mage = 13.26 years, SD = 3.39) and both their mothers and fathers. Adolescents completed assessments of perceived parental coparenting behaviors, emotion regulation strategies, depression, and anxiety. Parents completed assessments of their own coparenting behaviors. Latent profile analysis with a person-centered approach was used to identify four profiles of parent–child discrepancies in negative coparenting and three profiles in positive coparenting. Adolescents who reported more negative coparenting (i.e., conflict and disparagement) or less positive coparenting (i.e., integrity and reprimand) than their parents adopted increased expressive suppression and decreased cognitive reappraisal, which were associated with higher levels of depression and anxiety during the pandemic. This study emphasizes the importance of comprehending the patterns of parent–child discrepancies in family dynamics and highlights the practical importance of improving emotion regulation strategies in adolescents from maladaptive family patterns to maintain their emotional well-being.

COVID-19封锁期间感知父母养育方式的亲子差异:与中国青少年情绪健康的关系
父母与子女在父母行为感知报告中的差异很常见,并且与青少年心理健康有关。然而,人们对涉及父亲-母亲-孩子三位一体的育儿行为的这些差异知之甚少,例如父母共同养育,以及它们对青少年情绪健康的影响,特别是在COVID-19大流行期间的封锁等特殊情况下。本研究检验了一个中介模型,以检验在大流行期间中国家庭中,差异模式是否以及如何通过情绪调节策略(如表达抑制、认知重评价)与青少年抑郁和焦虑相关。参与者包括747名青少年(48.6%男性;(年龄= 13.26岁,SD = 3.39)和父母。青少年完成了感知父母教养行为、情绪调节策略、抑郁和焦虑的评估。父母们完成了对自己养育子女行为的评估。采用以人为本的潜在特征分析方法,确定了消极父母教养中4种亲子差异特征和积极父母教养中3种亲子差异特征。与父母相比,报告消极父母教养(即冲突和贬低)或较少积极父母教养(即正直和谴责)的青少年表现出更多的表达抑制和较少的认知重新评价,这与大流行期间更高程度的抑郁和焦虑有关。本研究强调了理解家庭动态中亲子差异模式的重要性,并强调了改善来自适应不良家庭模式的青少年的情绪调节策略以维持其情绪健康的现实重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Family Process
Family Process Multiple-
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
5.10%
发文量
96
期刊介绍: Family Process is an international, multidisciplinary, peer-reviewed journal committed to publishing original articles, including theory and practice, philosophical underpinnings, qualitative and quantitative clinical research, and training in couple and family therapy, family interaction, and family relationships with networks and larger systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信