Commentary on: The Prevalence of Eating Disorders and Disordered Eating in Adults Seeking Obesity Treatment: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analyses by Melville et al.
{"title":"Commentary on: The Prevalence of Eating Disorders and Disordered Eating in Adults Seeking Obesity Treatment: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analyses by Melville et al.","authors":"Natasha A Schvey, Marian Tanofsky-Kraff","doi":"10.1002/eat.24522","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Melville et al.'s 2025 systematic review and meta-analysis highlight the prevalence of eating disorders and disordered eating among adults seeking obesity treatment. Findings showed that the prevalence of binge-eating disorder in obesity treatment-seeking samples exceeds community norms. Results corroborate prior research suggesting that high body weight and eating pathology frequently co-occur and that individuals seeking weight management may be a high-risk population for both sub- and full-threshold eating disorders. Although concerns persist that weight loss efforts may promote or worsen eating disorder symptoms, research indicates that structured, evidence-based interventions typically have neutral or positive effects on disordered eating outcomes. However, rigorous and consistent screening for eating disorders among individuals with high weight is lacking. Importantly, obesity and eating disorders share many common etiological factors, suggesting that integrated intervention is both feasible and highly beneficial. Despite this, the fields of obesity and eating disorders remain siloed. This bifurcation disproportionately impacts youth and adolescents who are at high risk for the onset of both conditions. Currently, standards of care fail to include screening for eating disorders, particularly in youth with high weight, who may be overlooked or misdiagnosed due, in part, to weight-based stigma. Universal, developmentally sensitive screening tools and comprehensive assessment of eating disorder risk factors are urgently needed in pediatric primary care settings. As evidence mounts for concurrent treatment models of high weight and eating disorders, integration across science and clinical care is vital to improve outcomes for youth affected by both conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":51067,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Eating Disorders","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Eating Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.24522","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Melville et al.'s 2025 systematic review and meta-analysis highlight the prevalence of eating disorders and disordered eating among adults seeking obesity treatment. Findings showed that the prevalence of binge-eating disorder in obesity treatment-seeking samples exceeds community norms. Results corroborate prior research suggesting that high body weight and eating pathology frequently co-occur and that individuals seeking weight management may be a high-risk population for both sub- and full-threshold eating disorders. Although concerns persist that weight loss efforts may promote or worsen eating disorder symptoms, research indicates that structured, evidence-based interventions typically have neutral or positive effects on disordered eating outcomes. However, rigorous and consistent screening for eating disorders among individuals with high weight is lacking. Importantly, obesity and eating disorders share many common etiological factors, suggesting that integrated intervention is both feasible and highly beneficial. Despite this, the fields of obesity and eating disorders remain siloed. This bifurcation disproportionately impacts youth and adolescents who are at high risk for the onset of both conditions. Currently, standards of care fail to include screening for eating disorders, particularly in youth with high weight, who may be overlooked or misdiagnosed due, in part, to weight-based stigma. Universal, developmentally sensitive screening tools and comprehensive assessment of eating disorder risk factors are urgently needed in pediatric primary care settings. As evidence mounts for concurrent treatment models of high weight and eating disorders, integration across science and clinical care is vital to improve outcomes for youth affected by both conditions.
期刊介绍:
Articles featured in the journal describe state-of-the-art scientific research on theory, methodology, etiology, clinical practice, and policy related to eating disorders, as well as contributions that facilitate scholarly critique and discussion of science and practice in the field. Theoretical and empirical work on obesity or healthy eating falls within the journal’s scope inasmuch as it facilitates the advancement of efforts to describe and understand, prevent, or treat eating disorders. IJED welcomes submissions from all regions of the world and representing all levels of inquiry (including basic science, clinical trials, implementation research, and dissemination studies), and across a full range of scientific methods, disciplines, and approaches.