A Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis Of Randomized Trials Of Therapeutic Intraarticular Facet Joint Injections In Chronic Axial Spinal Pain.

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Pain physician Pub Date : 2025-07-01
Laxmaiah Manchikanti, Emilija Knezevic, Aleksandar Sic, Nebojsa Nick Knezevic, Alan D Kaye, Mahendra Sanapati, Joshua A Hirsch
{"title":"A Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis Of Randomized Trials Of Therapeutic Intraarticular Facet Joint Injections In Chronic Axial Spinal Pain.","authors":"Laxmaiah Manchikanti, Emilija Knezevic, Aleksandar Sic, Nebojsa Nick Knezevic, Alan D Kaye, Mahendra Sanapati, Joshua A Hirsch","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic axial spinal pain remains a leading cause of disability. Therapeutic interventional modalities for managing axial spinal pain of facet joint origin include intraarticular injections, facet joint nerve blocks, and radiofrequency neurotomy.Based on multiple randomized controlled trials (RCTs), systematic reviews, and clinical guidelines, the evidence supporting intraarticular facet joint injections is rated as Level III, with a weak to moderate recommendation for managing spinal facet joint pain.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate intraarticular facet joint injections as a therapeutic option for managing chronic axial spinal pain of facet joint origin.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs involving intraarticular facet joint injections, conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases from 1966 through February 2025, including manual searches of bibliographies from known review articles. The methodological quality and risk of bias for the included studies were assessed.Evidence was graded using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria. The level of evidence was classified using a modified best evidence synthesis, ranging from Level I to Level V.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>The primary outcome measure was the proportion of patients achieving significant pain relief and functional improvement of more than 50% for a minimum of 3 months. Duration of relief was categorized as short-term (< 6 months) and long-term (> 6 months).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This analysis identified 12 high-quality and 2 moderate-quality RCTs based on Cochrane review criteria, and 11 high-quality and 3 moderate-quality RCTs based on Interventional Pain Management Techniques - Quality Appraisal of Reliability and Risk of Bias Assessment (IPM-QRB) criteria. Based on grade assessment, there were no high quality trials.Evidence synthesis using both qualitative and quantitative analyses, along with GRADE assessment, indicated Level IV (limited evidence), with low certainty and a low level of recommendation.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>The primary limitation is the continued paucity of high-quality literature.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on qualitative analysis and GRADE assessment, intraarticular facet joint injections are supported by Level IV evidence, with limited quality, low certainty, and a low strength of recommendation.</p>","PeriodicalId":19841,"journal":{"name":"Pain physician","volume":"28 4","pages":"261-286"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain physician","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Chronic axial spinal pain remains a leading cause of disability. Therapeutic interventional modalities for managing axial spinal pain of facet joint origin include intraarticular injections, facet joint nerve blocks, and radiofrequency neurotomy.Based on multiple randomized controlled trials (RCTs), systematic reviews, and clinical guidelines, the evidence supporting intraarticular facet joint injections is rated as Level III, with a weak to moderate recommendation for managing spinal facet joint pain.

Objective: To evaluate intraarticular facet joint injections as a therapeutic option for managing chronic axial spinal pain of facet joint origin.

Study design: A systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs involving intraarticular facet joint injections, conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist.

Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases from 1966 through February 2025, including manual searches of bibliographies from known review articles. The methodological quality and risk of bias for the included studies were assessed.Evidence was graded using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria. The level of evidence was classified using a modified best evidence synthesis, ranging from Level I to Level V.

Outcome measures: The primary outcome measure was the proportion of patients achieving significant pain relief and functional improvement of more than 50% for a minimum of 3 months. Duration of relief was categorized as short-term (< 6 months) and long-term (> 6 months).

Results: This analysis identified 12 high-quality and 2 moderate-quality RCTs based on Cochrane review criteria, and 11 high-quality and 3 moderate-quality RCTs based on Interventional Pain Management Techniques - Quality Appraisal of Reliability and Risk of Bias Assessment (IPM-QRB) criteria. Based on grade assessment, there were no high quality trials.Evidence synthesis using both qualitative and quantitative analyses, along with GRADE assessment, indicated Level IV (limited evidence), with low certainty and a low level of recommendation.

Limitations: The primary limitation is the continued paucity of high-quality literature.

Conclusion: Based on qualitative analysis and GRADE assessment, intraarticular facet joint injections are supported by Level IV evidence, with limited quality, low certainty, and a low strength of recommendation.

慢性脊柱轴性疼痛的关节突关节内注射治疗性随机试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
背景:慢性轴性脊柱疼痛仍然是致残的主要原因。介入治疗方式包括关节内注射、小关节神经阻滞和射频神经切开术。基于多个随机对照试验(rct)、系统评价和临床指南,支持关节内关节突关节注射的证据被评为III级,对治疗脊柱小关节疼痛的建议为弱至中度。目的:评价关节内小关节注射作为治疗小关节源性慢性脊柱轴性疼痛的治疗选择。研究设计:对涉及关节突关节内注射的随机对照试验进行系统回顾和荟萃分析,按照系统回顾和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)清单进行。方法:从1966年到2025年2月,对多个数据库进行了全面的文献检索,包括对已知综述文章的书目进行人工检索。对纳入研究的方法学质量和偏倚风险进行了评估。采用推荐、评估、发展和评价分级(GRADE)标准对证据进行分级。使用改良的最佳证据综合法对证据水平进行分类,从I级到v级。结局指标:主要结局指标是至少3个月获得显著疼痛缓解和功能改善超过50%的患者比例。缓解持续时间分为短期(< 6个月)和长期(< 6个月)。结果:本分析确定了12个基于Cochrane评价标准的高质量rct和2个中等质量rct,以及11个基于介入性疼痛管理技术-可靠性质量评价和偏倚风险评估(IPM-QRB)标准的高质量rct和3个中等质量rct。基于分级评估,没有高质量的试验。采用定性和定量分析的证据综合,以及GRADE评估,显示为IV级(有限证据),确定性低,推荐水平低。限制:主要的限制是高质量文献的持续缺乏。结论:基于定性分析和GRADE评估,关节面关节内注射为IV级证据支持,质量有限,确定性低,推荐强度低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pain physician
Pain physician CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
21.60%
发文量
234
期刊介绍: Pain Physician Journal is the official publication of the American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians (ASIPP). The open access journal is published 6 times a year. Pain Physician Journal is a peer-reviewed, multi-disciplinary, open access journal written by and directed to an audience of interventional pain physicians, clinicians and basic scientists with an interest in interventional pain management and pain medicine. Pain Physician Journal presents the latest studies, research, and information vital to those in the emerging specialty of interventional pain management – and critical to the people they serve.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信